OAKLAND (KRON) -- Some teachers in Oakland are rallying behind two students who were interrogated by the Secret Service. That followed remarks the teenagers made about the President during a class discussion. The incident has many people angry.
For years the classroom has been the setting for the free expression of ideas, but two weeks ago certain ideas led to two students being taken out of class and grilled by the United States Secret Service.
It happened at Oakland High. The discussion was about the war in Iraq. That's when two students made comments about the President of the United States. While the exact wording is up for debate, the teacher didn't consider it mere criticism, but a direct threat and she called the Secret Service.
Teacher Cassie Lopez says, "They were so shaken up and afraid."
Now, other teachers are coming to the aid of the two students and crying foul.
"I would start with the teacher, she made a poor judgement," Lopez says.
Teacher Larry Felson says, "What we're concerned about is academic freedom and that students have the right to free expression in the classroom."
Even worse, they say, is the fact that the students were grilled by federal agents without legal counsel or their parents present, just the principal.
"When one of the students asked, 'do we have to talk now? Can we be silent? Can we get legal council?' they were told, 'we own you, you don't have any legal rights,'" Felson says.
"We don't want federal agents or police coming in our schools and interrogating our children at the whim of someone who has a hunch something might be wrong," Lopez says.
The union representing Oakland teachers requires that students be afforded legal counsel and parental guidance before they're interrogated by authorities. It's too late for the two involved in this incident, and teachers say it's something they'll carry with them for years.
"I tell you the looks on those childrens faces. I don't know if they'll say anything about anything ever again. Is that what we want? I don't think we want that," says Lopez.
New World disORDER - (Articles and Links) ---> http://pnews.org/)
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
Poisoned Gift that Keeps on Giving
(Date: 2003-04-27 15:36:32)
Topic: war
URL: http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=34
You can read interesting articles at http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnukehttp://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
--- allan ginsberg <negrodawn2003@...> wrote:
HEY GUYS DO I GOT A GREAT STORY FOR YOU ABOUT FBI
COINTELPRO TACTICS USED IN AUSTIN, TEXAS. My story of
FBI--APD harassment included the usual stuff by our
heros including: Illegal wiretapping for ten years;
Illegal bugging of my house and apartments for ten
years; Illegal bugging of my vehicle for ten years;
Illegal GPS tracking system in car for ten years (go
to the TSCM Yahoo group to find out how to find the
GPS); numerous thugs and goons making terroristic
threats, assault and battery, criminal stalking;
Illegal Opening of my mail for ten years; six friends
investigated and fired from their jobs; lease
terminated without cause; they put a violent exconvict
next door to me and they didn't pull him out until I
threatened to kill the fucker; followed into the
bathroom five times at bars by thugs; they hired a guy
to spit in my face; harassment from a snitch who used
private conversations from my phone to use intimate
conversations as material for harassment; sliceing my
tires 3 times in nine days while I was under
surveillance 24 hours a day. I GUARANTEE YOU THAT
THIS IS NOT A FREE SOCIETY AND YOU ARE GUILTY BY
SUSPICION UNCORROBORATED BY ANY PROBABLE CAUSE. FUCK
THE FEDS. FUCK THE COP SCUM. THE CRIMINALS ARE THE
FUCKING COPS?!
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
>
>
> Key FBI witness retracted criticisms in McVeigh case
> By John Solomon
> The Associated Press
>
REPLY: THIS IS NOTHING NEW FOR THE BIGGEST CON ARTIST
AGENCY OF BULLSH_ITERS...THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INCOMPETENCE AND DELIBERATE INCOMPETENCE IS NOTHING
BUT PROFESSIONAL LIARS...THE FBI IS MORE INTERESTED IN
PROPAGANDA THAN THE TRUTH...WHITEHURST BLEW THE
WHISTLE ON THOUSANDS OF CASES OF FBI INCOMETENCE AND
PERJURY AND FALSIFIED FORENSIC REPORTS...THE FBI IS
NOTHING BUT A ROGUE CRIMINAL AGENCY OF WACKOS, LIARS,
THUGS, IDIOTS AND GOONS....CHECK OUT EX FBI AGENT
GERAL SOSBEE'S WEBSITE BY SEARCHING GOOGLE FOR "GERAL
SOSBEE"...ALSO OTHER EX FBI PERSONNEL HAVE BLOWN THE
WHISTLE LIKE SPECIAL AGENT SWEARINGEN AND JOHN
RYAN....GO TO "THE JUDI BARI WEBSITE" AND SEARCH FOR
THE AFFADAVIT OF SPECIAL AGENT JONH RYAN WHO TALKS
ABOUT ALL THE ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING AND BUGGING
ATTRIBUTED TO INFORMANTS WHO DO NOT EXIST?!!!!!...YOU
CANNOT AND SHOULD NOT TRUST THE FBI OR ANYTHING THEY
DO OR DO NOT DO....
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
Key FBI witness retracted criticisms in McVeigh case
By John Solomon The Associated Press
May 5, 2003
WASHINGTON -- A prominent FBI science witness told federal investigators that his lab colleagues had performed shoddy work in the Timothy McVeigh case and then abruptly retracted several statements before appearing as a prosecution witness at trial, a transcript shows.
FBI explosives expert Steven Burmeister, who since has risen to the FBI lab's chief of scientific analysis, initiated a meeting Dec. 19, 1996, with the Justice Department inspector general to whom he made the original allegations 18 months earlier.
"There are several statements in the interview I would like to clarify or correct," Burmeister told the investigators in a taped interview. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the transcript.
After receiving a Miranda warning about his constitutional rights, Burmeister proceeded for 68 pages of the transcript to correct or retract earlier statements he made that colleagues who worked on the bombing evidence did not use proper techniques or were unqualified to do some of the tests they performed.
"I'm not sure why I would have said that," Burmeister said at one point when retracting an earlier statement that a knife with possible explosive residue should not have been swabbed at the lab.
FBI officials defended Burmeister, saying the lab witness asked to make the changes after seeing a summary of his first interview and that he was under no pressure to change any testimony to help the McVeigh prosecution.
"I can state categorically that Steve Burmeister has never felt pressure to change any testimony, any report from lab officials, the FBI, prosecutors or anyone else," FBI lab director Dwight Adams said.
"He made the effort because he is such a meticulous, honest person that he wanted the IG report to be correct," Adams said. "He truly is one of our best."
Legal experts, however, said the transcript might pose a longer-term problem for the FBI. Since the McVeigh trial in 1997, Burmeister has appeared as a witness in several other prominent cases.
The experts said the transcript could be considered exculpatory evidence that prosecutors were legally obligated to turn over to defense lawyers in any cases in which Burmeister is testifying about the lab techniques involved in his interviews because it speaks to the core issues of his credibility and expertise.
FBI officials said they did not know whether Burmeister's interviews have ever been turned over in any case, including cases of McVeigh and Oklahoma City bombing conspirator Terry Nichols.
"Contradictory sworn statements are the kind of information a jury could take into consideration in evaluating his credibility, especially when those statement come to bear on the very expertise he is supposed to have," said Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor who specializes in legal ethics.
The inspector general also received information from FBI whistle-blower Frederic Whitehurst, who was Burmeister's mentor, that Burmeister had complained in the months before he retracted his testimony that he was being pressured by prosecutors and lab employees to change his testimony or scientific conclusions.
New World disORDER - (Articles and Links) ---> http://pnews.org/)
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
YOU GOTTA HAVE NUKES
You have to have Nukes to get into that very exclusive club of countries
which have nuclear weapons but it is so monopolistic that those who do
don't want those who don't to have them. Those with nuclear weapons
threaten the world and each other with annihilation. BUT, they are not
about to give them up. Only South Africa did that and I think it was
because they didn't trust themselves and each other to have them - but
they also claimed to give up bioweapons and recently a scientist there
admitted that they have biological weapons of mass destruction.
North Korea says their options if threatened by the U.S. would be to use
them or they could sell them. The U.S. was more concerned with Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction than it was North Korea, but all that may be
changing. North Korea has oil too (recently discovered) and it is a lot
more technologically advanced (though still basic by U.S. and British
standards) than Iraq ever was.
Washington however still declares it's right to conduct "pre-emptive"
strikes against ANYONE at ANYTIME. This attitude and statements coming
from the imperialist Bush administration puts the North Koreans on notice
that possession of nuclear weapons is their defense against an
out-of-control unelected-president who considers them "evil" and is
divinely inspired to eliminate all evil (and hasten Armageddon).
YOU GOTTA HAVE GERMS
The U.S. armed Iraq with chemicals during the Iran-Iraq war.
"A U.S. Senate inquiry in 1995 accidentally revealed that during the
Iran-Iraq war the United States had sent Iraq samples of all the strains
of germs used by the latter to make biological weapons. The strains were
sent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [sic] and the
Americna Type Culture Collection to the same sites in Iraq that UN weapons
inspectors later determined were part of Iraq's biological weapons
program." [Times of India, October 2002 as quoted in (RUPE) Research Unit
for Political Economy, "Behind the Invasion of Iraq"]
YOU GOTTA HAVE CHEMICALS
The Research Unit for Political Economy (based in India) writes that "It
is ironic to hear the United States today talk of Saddam Hussein's attacks
on the Kurds in 1988. These attacks had their full support:" [ibid]
"As part of the Anfal campaign against the Kurds (February to September
1988), the Iraqi regime used chemical weapons extensively against its own
civilian population. Between 50,0000 and 186,000 Kurds were killed in
these attacks, over 1,200 Kurdish villages were destroyed, and 300,000
Kurds were displaced...The Anfal campaign was carried out with the
acquiescence of the West. Rather than condemn the massacres of Jurds, the
United States escalated its supprot for Iraq. It joined in Iraq's attacks
on Iranian facilites, blowing up two Iranian oil rigs and destroying an
Iranian frigate a month after the Halabja attack *. Within two months,
senior U.S. officials were encouraging corporate coordination through an
Iraqi state-sponsored forum. The United States administraiton opposed, and
eventually blocked, a U.S. Senate bill that cut off loans to Iraq. The
United States approved exports to Iraq of items with dual civilian and
military use at double the rate in the aftermath of Halabja as it did
before 1988. Iraqi written guarantees about civilian use were accepted by
the United States commerce department, which did not request licenses and
reviews (as it did for many other countries). The Bush (Senior)
administration approved $695,000 worth of advanced data transmission
devices the day before Iraq invaded Kuwait." [RUPE]
* (A recent CIA report indicated that the gas used at Halabja most likely
was used by the Iranians and not the Iraqis as is often claimed by the
Bush administration. See http://pnews.org/ for links to articles about
this revelation which has been covered up until recently.)
It was all about the MONEY and those commercial contracts with Iraq. It
was about stopping the Iranian Revolution from spreading. It was about
oil. And a lot of it has been covered up while the U.S. puts a
"humanitarian" spin on their behavior and what has always been the
American agenda. The full extent of U.S. involvement with Iraq seeps out
over time and revelations like the one from the CIA reveals just how far
the administration (all of them) will go to make their case and convince
Americans to fight unjust and aggressive wars for the ruling elites.
"The full extend of U.S. complicity in Iraq's `weapons of mass
destruction' program became clear in December 2002, when Iraq submitted an
11,800-page reprot on these programs to the UN Security Council. The
United States insisted on examining the report before anyone else, even
before the weapons inspectors, and promptly insisted on removed 8,000
pages from it before allowing the non permanent members of the Security
Council to look at it. Iraq apparently leaked the list of American
companies whose names appear in the report to a German daily, DIE
TAGEZEITUNG. Apart from American companies, German firms were heavily
implicated."[RUPE]
"(Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons, like his suppression of
internal opposition, has been continuously useful to U.S. interests:
condoned and abetted during periods of alliance between the two countries,
it is routinely exploited for propaganda purposes during periods of
tension and war.)" [RUPE]
Hank Roth
http://pnews.org/
PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New World disORDER - (Articles and Links) ---> http://pnews.org/)
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
Psychiatric Problems and Humanitarian Concerns
The more people feel wars are "just" the less of a psychiatric problem
society will have with conducting it so the U.S. administration does the
best job it can to sell their wars as necessary. It requires very
sophisticated public relations and this administration is very good at it.
But no matter how well they sell the Iraq war the facts are it was
necessary to invade Iraq for economic reasons. It really had NOTHING to do
with "humanitarian concerns" and very little to do with those illicit and
insidious weapons of mass destruction. Everyone in this administration
knows there really was "no imminent threat" but the U.S. national interest
is at the heart of this unprovoked war of aggression against the Iraqi
people.
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=53
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
Every burglar would now learn from US military excuses
(Date: 2003-04-27 12:46:50)
Topic: rhetoric
URL: http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=110
You can read interesting articles at http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnukehttp://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exclusive interview: Turner blew whistle on Ground Zero theft
Watch Lisa Myers' report.
By Lisa Myers NBC NEWS
WASHINGTON, April 29 — For a quarter-century, Jane Turner has been a special agent for the FBI. But now the agency is trying to fire her, and Turner says it’s because she blew the whistle on FBI wrongdoing. Agent Turner tells her story in an exclusive interview with NBC’s senior investigative correspondent, Lisa Myers.
VETERAN FBI agent Jane Turner was given an unpleasant assignment last year: investigate theft from Ground Zero — a fire engine door, artifacts, goods donated to victims — all allegedly stolen during the cleanup at New York’s World Trade Center. But just as the case was heating up, Turner made a stunning discovery. Inside her own FBI office in Minneapolis, on a secretary’s desk, was a severely damaged Tiffany crystal globe. “She told me that it came from Ground Zero,” Turner said. “I was absolutely shocked. And I asked the individual where she had gotten that. She responded it was an evidence-response team member from the FBI.” In her first interview, Turner tells NBC News she was amazed to learn her own colleagues — members of the FBI’s elite Evidence Response Team — may have committed the very crime she was investigating. She says she immediately reported the problem to a federal prosecutor, then to her supervisor, and waited for him to act. Two weeks later, after nothing apparently had been done, Turner seized the globe, bagged it as evidence and took it to Justice Department officials in Washington. What did they do? “So far as I know, nothing,” Turner said. The Justice Department is investigating the allegations. So far, there has been no action against whoever took the globe.
UNFAVORABLE EVALUATION
‘The only thing they allowed me to keep was my 20-year ring.’ — JANE TURNER FBI agent under fire
But, for Turner, the consequences were immediate. Three weeks after blowing the whistle, she received a scathing evaluation, charging “she has tarnished the FBI’s reputation” by telling prosecutors and another federal agency about the globe incident. The FBI took the position that by reporting that an FBI agent may have committed a crime, Turner was the person who actually tarnished the agency — not the person who may have stolen from Ground Zero. Last fall, after 24 years on the job, Turner was put on leave and stripped of her badge and revolver. “The only thing they allowed me to keep was my 20-year ring,” she said. Privately, some FBI agents are furious that Turner made a big deal about a $275 globe and say she’s locked horns with management for years. Turner said she’s not insensitive to her colleagues’ thinking that she’s being needlessly destructive. “I could understand why they may feel that way,” Turner said. “I believe … that no man is above the law, including FBI agents.” But to families who lost loved ones at Ground Zero, the alleged theft occurred on sacred ground. “It’s despicable,” said Monica Gabrielle, who lost her husband, Richard, on Sept. 11, 2001. “It’s just unconscionable that someone picked it up and that they didn’t have some sort of guilt about it afterwards.” Turner recently received a notice that she’s being fired. An FBI spokesman strongly denies Turner is being dismissed because of her whistleblower allegations. The FBI claims there have been problems with her for years. Among the charges: that she doesn’t work well with co-workers and makes disparaging comments about bosses.
‘BREAKS A LITTLE CHINA’
Advertisement
But Turner points out she had only very positive reviews until four years ago, when she first blew the whistle on FBI misconduct, including a botched investigation into sexual abuse of a child. NBC News spoke with other law-enforcement officials who’ve worked with Turner. They described her as a skilled, hard-working, effective investigator — a person who, one said, “breaks a little china,” one whose independence and by-the-book manner sometimes rankle colleagues. Some of her colleagues say, “Look, Jane can be unreasonable. She’s a real stickler.” Is that fair? “When it comes to violations of federal law, I would agree with that.” But Turner said the real reason she’s being fired is she blew the whistle on wrongdoing inside the FBI. “The bottom line for the FBI — which we’re all taught — is, you do not embarrass the bureau. And I had embarrassed the FBI.” Turner said she still loves the FBI, is fighting to keep her job — and would do it all again.
Lisa Myers is NBC’s senior investigative correspondent.
April 24, 2003
F.B.I. Opens Inquiry Into Seizure of Documents From Associated Press
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
WASHINGTON, April 23 - The F.B.I. has opened an internal ethics
investigation to determine whether its agents abused their authority by
secretly seizing from a news organization documents on international
terrorism, officials said today.
An Associated Press reporter in the Philippines sent an unclassified
F.B.I. document to another A.P. reporter in Washington last September as
part of research for an article, but the package never arrived.
FedEx originally said the parcel might have fallen off its delivery van.
But the F.B.I., in an April 3 letter released today, acknowledged that
its agents had confiscated the package.
F.B.I. officials offered no explanation for the seizure. But the
bureau's Office of Professional Responsibility has opened a review "to
ascertain the details relating to this incident and to take appropriate
personnel action, as warranted," according to the letter, from Eleni P.
Kalisch, acting assistant director for Congressional affairs, to Senator
Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa, who had expressed concern about
the case.
Ms. Kalisch told Mr. Grassley that she shared his concerns about the
case and that the F.B.I. took "very seriously" possible violations of
the First Amendment protecting freedom of the press and the Fourth
Amendment ensuring the right to due process.
At a time when the F.B.I. has assumed broader investigative powers to
fight terrorism, the episode has provoked outrage from some members of
Congress and from news media advocates, who say the federal agents
appear to have crossed the line.
"The F.B.I. does not have the right to seize material without a warrant,
without even notifying anyone, and just making it vanish," Lucy
Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of
the Press, said in an interview. "That, in our minds, is completely
illegal."
Ms. Dalglish said her group was looking into another unconfirmed report
suggesting that federal agents had recently intercepted a package that
another major news organization sent from a Middle East bureau to the
United States.
In the Associated Press incident, a customs inspector in Indianapolis
appears to have opened the Washington-bound package in a periodic,
routine inspection, officials said. Upon seeing that the package
contained an F.B.I. report related to terrorism in the Philippines, the
inspector notified the F.B.I., which seized the document without
notifying FedEx or The Associated Press, officials said.
F.B.I. agents in Indianapolis appear to have determined that the
document, an eight-year-old laboratory report detailing materials seized
from the apartment of a man convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center
bombing, was too sensitive for public consumption, officials said.
But The Associated Press said last month after discovering that the
package had been intercepted that the laboratory report was
unclassified, did not contain information that it believed would
compromise public safety or national security, and had twice been
introduced in open court in New York.
Louis D. Boccardi, president of The Associated Press, said he looked
forward to learning the results of the F.B.I.'s investigation. "That the
package belonged to the press was apparent on its face," Mr. Boccardi
said. "The interception was improper and clandestine."
Mr. Grassley said he was glad the F.B.I. appeared to be taking the case
seriously enough to open the internal investigation, which could lead to
disciplinary action against any agents found to have violated internal
policies.
"It's highly unusual for the government to intercept communications of
the media, and I want to make sure we don't have any attempts to censor
or stymie the news," Mr. Grassley said in a statement.
If agents were in fact trying to censor the press, Mr. Grassley said,
"the F.B.I. should own up, take responsibility, apologize and ensure it
does not happen again."
While the Customs Service said its inspection of the package was random,
press advocates said they were suspicious of that claim, in part because
it was the second time federal agents had focused on John Solomon, the
A.P. reporter in Washington to whom the package was addressed.
In 2001, the Justice Department subpoenaed Mr. Solomon's home phone
records to try to determine the source of leaks in articles he had
written about an investigation into Senator Robert G. Torricelli of New
Jersey.
Mr. Grassley said the Customs Service had not responded to his requests
for an explanation in the case. "I don't know what the Customs Service
has to hide," he said. "Maybe this is just the tip of the iceberg."
Customs officials said today that they were still finalizing a response
to the senator and could not comment on the the inquiry.
But one customs official said the agency believed its employees had
handled the episode properly by turning the package over to the F.B.I.
"If I was an inspector and I opened something suspicious related to the
F.B.I., I sure as heck would call somebody else in to look at it,
especially in these times," the official said. "A.P. was not singled out
here."
An F.B.I. official also defended the bureau's handling of the episode.
"This was an internal F.B.I. document," the official said. "It was not
something that was supposed to be released publicly. It's like taking
something from an F.B.I. file and handing it to someone."
The official added that investigators might want to determine how the
document, which the F.B.I. originally sent to Philippine authorities as
part of an investigation, wound up in the hands of The Associated Press.
"This document was not the property of The Associated Press," the
official said. "That's the rub."
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/24/national/24FBI.html?tntemail1=&pagewanted=prin\
t&position=
>
New World disORDER - (Articles and Links) ---> http://pnews.org/)
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
Has anyone apologized to the families
of those 200,000 to 300,000 victims
of George Bush's War
"The front page of Wednesday's Jordan Times shows a photograph of Razek
al-Kazem al-Khafaj, an Iraqi man in Hillah, south of Baghdad, throwing up
his arms to the sky in a gesture of grief. At his feet are the coffins of
his three children, one an infant less than a year old." .....The man says
he lost 15 members of his family when the pickup truck they were in was
blown up by a rocket fired from an American Apache helicopter. [CBC]
Obviously the truth has lost a great battle here. Journalists have been
targeted and tyrants in Washington have prevailed. Now more than ever it
is important for good people to stand up against injustice and the
immorality of this unprovoked war of aggression. The highest form of
patriotism and ethics require that we speak the truth. I refuse to believe
all those who supported the war are so desensitized that they can not feel
a sense of loss and compassion and agony for the families who lost loved
ones in this immoral war; not just Americans and British, but all the
Iraqis who were the victims of George Bush's psychopathic mentality and
behavior. People have the "real" power to effect change and bring war
criminals to justice. Demand a government anti-war policy and demand that
this unelected president is tried for war crimes.
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=39
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SYRIOUSLY COOPERATIVE
Read this very interesting article and ask yourself what is the
cooperation that has shielded Syria who would be (should have
been) convicted of far worse than anything the U.S., true or not, has
accused Saddam Hussein?
http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/modules.php?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=38
_____
/ o o \
===OO=====OO==================================================
TheGolemsPlace (Where everything REALLY begins)
West Server -: http://pnews.org/ East Server -: http://g0lem.net/
Vortals: http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (New World disOrder)
http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Middle-East)
http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Progressive News and Views)
http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Class Struggle)
==================================================================
\_/ \_/
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NO BLOOD FOR OIL - DROP BUSH, NOT BOMBS! - PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS!
END CAPITALISM AND GIVE PEACE A CHANCE.......
SUPPORT THE TROOPS BY BRINGING THEM HOME!
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New World disORDER - (Articles and Links) ---> http://pnews.org/)
=========================================================================
Subscribe or Unsubscribe to PNEWS ("progressive" news and views) forums
(on internet since 1982): --- http://pnews.org/signup.shtml
Oldest "progressive" mailing list on the interNUT....
=========================================================================
THIS IS AN EMERGENCY
DONT LET THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT PASS LEGISLATION MAKING AMERICA A
SPY STATE AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO SEARCH YOUR HOME WHILE YOUR AT
WORK WITHOUT A WARRANT AND WITHOUT EVEN LETTING YOU KNOW AND TAKING
ANYTHING THEY WANT!!!!!
SIGN IT HERE
http://www.petitiononline.com/civlib03/petition.html
PASS THIS TO EVERYONE AND EVERY GROUP YOU KNOW!!!
Children held at Guantanamo BayOliver Burkeman in Washington Thursday April 24, 2003 The Guardian
Children younger than 16 are being held as "enemy combatants" in the American detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, the US military admitted yesterday, a practice human rights groups condemned as repugnant and illegal.
Three boys aged between 13 and 15 are among about 660 inmates at the controversial camp, a US military official told the Guardian, on condition of anonymity. The official would not disclose their nationalities but said they had been brought from Afghanistan this year on suspicion of terrorism.
As soon as their ages were confirmed in medical tests, the children were moved to a "dedicated juvenile facility" at the camp, where they could socialise with each other, according to Lieutenant Colonel Barry Johnson, a spokesman at the base.
"They are in a secure environment free from the influences of older detainees," Lt Col Johnson said. "They are receiving specialist mental health care, in recognition of the difficult circumstances that child combatants go through, and some basic education in terms of reading and writing." Efforts were under way to contact their home nations, he added.
But the children would still be held indefinitely and would not be granted access to lawyers, he said, because the US continues to view them as "enemy combatants" - a term it has used to argue that the Geneva Conventions do not apply to the inmates, who have not been charged with any crimes.
That would be the case "until we ensure that they're no longer a threat to the United States, that there's no pending law enforcement against them, that they're no longer of intelligence value," Lt Col Johnson said.
Holding the children was "wholly repugnant and contrary to basic principles of human rights," said Angela Wright of Amnesty International, and contravened UN rules with "near-universal acceptance" regarding the treatment of juveniles.
The United States and Somalia are the only member states of the United Nations no to have ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child, but the US is a signatory, and thus has "an obligation not to defeat the object and purpose of the treaty," Ms Wright said. "This is clearly totally at odds with the purpose of the treaty."
The precise legal ramifications are unclear, since many experts argue that the US is already in breach of international law by holding any of the detainees indefinitely without trial or charge, regardless of their ages.
Guantanamo Bay has attracted the condemnation of human rights campaigners since the first detainees arrived at what was Camp X-Ray, in January 2002. Soon after, they were pictured cowed, blindfolded and bound in the intense Cuban heat.
Since then, the US has built Camp Delta, a permanent and better-equipped facility, and has been at pains to describe how the inmates' religious and cultural preferences are being catered for. Representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross are in regular contact with the inmates.
But reports of hunger strikes and attempted suicides have continued to emerge from the base. Military officials have confirmed 25 suicide attempts by 17 people since the inception of the camp, with 15 this year, often by inmates attempting to strangle themselves.
One detainee who reportedly fell into a coma after trying to hang himself was back off life support this week, Lt Col Johnson said, but there was no word on what the authorities would do with him next. The Pentagon has published regulations for how the inmates, who come from 42 countries, might be tried by military tribunals, but has not yet nominated any of them for trial.
The US court of appeals ruled last month that the government was entitled to deny due legal process to the detainees because they are not Americans and are not being held on US territory.
The three boys are not the only inmates under 16 to have been brought to Guantanamo Bay. Canadian officials have been seeking for months to gain access to Omar al-Khadr, a Canadian national who they say is being held at Camp Delta after being captured on July 27 during fighting in eastern Afghanistan. He was 15 at the time, they said.
ASHINGTON, April 22 — Civil rights advocates demanded today that the federal government explain how hundreds of people — some of them vocal critics of the Bush administration — have ended up on a list used to stop people suspected of having terrorist links from boarding commercial air flights.
In a lawsuit filed in San Francisco, the American Civil Liberties Union said government officials had improperly withheld information about how people wind up on the "no fly" list, what steps are taken to ensure its accuracy and how people who are erroneously detained at airports can get their names off the list.
"Without even basic information about the no-fly list or other watch lists," the lawsuit said, "the public cannot evaluate the government's decision to use such lists."
Since the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the F.B.I. and federal transportation officials have generated secret lists of people suspected of having terrorist ties who should be stopped and questioned if they try to board an airplane.
Law enforcement officials say the policy is a necessary safeguard to prevent the type of security lapses that allowed two of the Sept. 11 hijackers to board a plane even though intelligence officials had reason to suspect they were terrorists.
But the so-called no-fly lists have generated criticism. Many people have been mistakenly stopped, while others assert they were on the list in part because of their strong liberal politics.
In a well-publicized incident last year, some two dozen members of a group called Peace Action of Wisconsin, including a priest, a nun and high school and college students, were detained in Milwaukee en route to a "teach-in" and missed their flight.
In San Francisco, meanwhile, Rebecca Gordon and Janet Adams, two self-described peace activists who help run a publication called War Times that has been critical of the administration's terrorism policies, were detained on their way to Boston. An American Trans Air employee told them their names appeared on a no-fly list, according to the A.C.L.U. lawsuit, which includes both women as plaintiffs.
Officials insisted they were not seeking to single out legitimate political critics. Ms. Adams's name may have been similar to that of another person on the no-fly list, they said.
Ms. Adams said in an interview that "it strains my credulity" to think that her longtime role as a political advocate did not play a part in the incident. "It's bad enough that the government is stopping people in these vast quantities," she said. "But then to learn that you can't even find out why they did it is just an additional injury."
In its lawsuit, the civil liberties union said it had documented 339 cases since the Sept. 11 attacks in which people at San Francisco International Airport were stopped and questioned because they were thought to be on the no-fly list. While the group's investigation has focused on San Francisco because of complaints there, it said the situation there offers a window into what is happening at airports around the country, based on anecdotal evidence the group has collected.
"There's every reason to believe this is happening at airports around the country," said Jayashri Srikantiah, staff lawyer for the A.C.L.U. of Northern California.
The civil liberties union brought the lawsuit under the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act after federal officials turned down several months of requests for information on the passenger lists.
The F.B.I. told the group in a letter last December that it found "no records pertinent" to the no-fly issue. But A.C.L.U. officials said records from the San Francisco airport showed that the F.B.I. was contacted about many of the airport detentions.
Officials at the Transportation Security Administration, named as a defendant in the suit, did not return calls seeking comment. Officials at the F.B.I., also named as a defendant, said they could not comment because the lawsuit was pending.
But a law enforcement official, who would speak only if not named, acknowledged that there was confusion in the public about how the no-fly lists were created and executed. The official said the F.B.I. provided intelligence on people suspected of links to terrorism, which was relayed to the transportation security agency. Transportation officials then provide airlines and airports with lists of people to look for at airports.
The security agency "needs to do a better job of explaining what this list is," the official said.
The official insisted that politics had nothing to do with who makes the list, saying that "people that are expressing their constitutional rights of free expression would not come to the attention of the F.B.I."
The following is from a correspondent who wishes to remain anonymous: I sent James Traficant a Christmas card a few months ago. I received this reply today.
***************
[click below for this exclusive, scorching letter from the prison cell of former Congressman Jim Traficant...]
Dear (anonymous),
Thank you! Thank you for thinking of me and my family. Life is hectic and fast-paced-- and for you to have thought of me, and then to stop and take time from your precious life to write me-- is an honor. And once again, I thank you! Most of the people who write me say they cannot understand why the government targeted me with such a passion. Every rumor and innuendo that any political opponent would plant and foster became public and, before long, developed into an indictment without any physical evidence-- only the testimony of subjects who were able to avoid jail by fabricating falsehoods about me. Lies and half-truths became 'facts'; and ultimately became a 10 count indictment. My evidence, that would have proved they were lying, was not allowed to be presented -- either before the Congress or the Federal Court! However, I know why I was targeted: I was not afraid of the government, and I had learned too much! The beginning of all of this was my first trial, in 1983, when I became the only American in history to defeat the U.S. Department of Justice in a RICO case-- pro se (representing myself), and me not being an attorney. They were embarrassed!
The straw that broke the camel's back was when I proved that John Demanjuk was not the infamous Ivan the Terrible of the Treblinka death camp in Poland. The government was stunned and in shock. The real Ivan was nine years older, taller, and had black hair and a scar on his neck; his name was Ivan Marchenko. My investigation, in conjunction with John Demanjuk's beautiful family, proved not only that John was innocent, but also that the Justice Department knew he was not guilty-- even before they took him to court!
Shame, shame!! They lied to the court-- gave false testimony and presented false witnesses-- knowing that he would be put to death! Shame!! The Justice Department then came after me with revenge, and a passion! I lost my respect and my faith in our government. Because this case was 'too sensitive,' Congress would not even hold a hearing on my evidence... Congress, all of them, at the time-- turned their back, worried about reelection!! The Democrats were in charge then, and they knew of my investigation in Congress... hoping I would abandon it! I did not! I sent my findings to the Israeli Supreme Court-- and they had no choice: They released John Demanjuk! In fact, they delivered him to me at the airport in Tel Aviv, Israel, and I personally brought him home, along with his son, his son-in-law, and Israeli bodyguards!
I am proud of what I did. No one else, in the House or the Senate, would even talk to the family-- afraid of media power and the vindictiveness of the Justice Department. But even today, John Demanjuk is still being persecuted.
Shame!
The government agents that destroyed Demanjuk's life should be in jail! That was just the tip of the iceberg. When people saw what I had done for the Demanjuk family they came to me with unbelievable information.
The information is so powerful that it is hard to believe, and the government knew I was getting sensitive information that could damage the American people's confidence in the government. People came to me with facts about Waco, Ruby Ridge, Pan Am Flight 103, Jimmy Hoffa, and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. It may all sound far-fetched, but I do know what happened to Hoffa and J.F.K. The government knows that I know-- and so they had to ruin my voice by destroying my credibility. I may yet divulge this information if I can get the proper forum.
As you know, I was the dreaded enemy of the I.R.S. My legislation in the last I.R.S. Reform Bill changed the Burden of Proof law. Before that, you had to prove you were innocent in a tax court. The burden of proof was on the taxpayer. The I.R.S. said you owed... but the I.R.S. did not have to prove it. Unbelievable! Now that the I.R.S. has to prove their charges, the following statistics tell the true story. Comparing One Year Before the changes to One Year After: 1. Wage Garnishments dropped from 3.1 million to 560,000; 2. Taxpayer Property Liens dropped from 680,000 to 161,000; 3. Foreclosures on individual family-owned homes dropped from 10,063 to 57! That's right: only 57 homes in all 50 states! Fact is, the I.R.S. was seizing our homes-- over 10,000 every year-- when they had neither proof nor the right to do so! Congress allowed the I.R.S. to intimidate us and frighten us. Think about it! And then maybe you can begin to understand why I love America but hate the Government -- and why the Government hates me. The Justice Department had to get rid of me, but I'll be damned if I would back down!
America is in trouble... not from without, but from within! The Central Government has become too powerful. Citizens fear the Government. This is wrong. This is dangerous! I know the Government covered-up and promulgated LIES about Waco, Ruby Ridge, Pan Am Flight 103, Hoffa, and J.F.K. The Government knew I was right when I called Janet Reno a traitor. Janet Reno sold us out when she refused to investigate a $10-million payoff to the Democratic Party from a general in the Red Chinese Army (no less!). Think about it! And the Government knew that I had known why Reno was forced to betray America! I'm proud that I tried to do something about it! Someday the truth will come out. (I hope China never attacks us!) Many of you have asked what you can do for me. I appreciate this. You can help my family:
Mrs. Tish Traficant 429 N. Main Street Poland, OH 44514
Thank you for remembering me... for thinking of me... for caring!
Prosecutors Detail Lavish Way of Life of Double Agent Suspect
By CALVIN SIMS
OS ANGELES, April 16 — It was no secret in political and social circles here that Katrina Leung, a long-time F.B.I. informer who is accused of being a Chinese double agent, liked the good life.
Ms. Leung, a 49-year-old businesswoman who was arrested last week, dressed impeccably, gave lavish parties at her home in San Marino, owned various businesses and property, and frequently flew overseas.
But the extent of Ms. Leung's assets, which the authorities have described as "enormous and complex," has begun to emerge in recent days, although a full accounting may never be known.
At a bail hearing for Ms. Leung on Tuesday, federal prosecutors said that she and her husband, Kam Leung, had access to at least $872,000 in bank and retirement accounts in the United States and that the couple might have had millions of dollars in foreign accounts under different names.
United States Assistant Attorney Rebecca Lonergan said Ms. Leung could use these assets if she chose to flee the United States. The prosecutor said Ms. Leung, a naturalized American citizen, had not reported hundreds of thousands of dollars in overseas earnings on her United States tax returns.
In addition, Ms. Leung claimed mortgage interest deductions on a California residence that was not in truth mortgaged, Ms. Lonergan said.
Citing her "significant foreign assets" as a flight risk, Federal Magistrate Victor B. Kenton on Tuesday ordered Ms. Leung held without bail until trial on charges of illegally obtaining secret documents from her Federal Bureau of Investigation handler, with whom she had a sexual affair.
The magistrate said that despite the best efforts of the authorities, "there is much about the defendant's financial wherewithal that has not been revealed in the court."
In a statement released today, Ms. Leung's lawyer, John Vandevelde, asked that the public "not jump to any conclusions" regarding the government's portrayal of his client's assets.
"Information is being withheld from us, and the government has only shown the tip of the iceberg," Mr. Vandevelde said. "When all the information is out it will show that for 20 years the F.B.I. controlled everything and knew everything that Ms. Leung did. Her overseas activities furthered her role for the F.B.I."
Ms. Leung, who is said to have extensive contacts in the Chinese government, was recruited by James J. Smith, an F.B.I. agent who was her main handler and lover for 20 years until his retirement in 2000.
Mr. Smith has been charged with gross negligence in his handling of national security documents that officials say Ms. Leung copied and passed on to the Chinese government. Mr. Smith was released last week on $250,000 bond. At the bail hearing for Ms. Leung, her lawyers argued that the F.B.I. was fully aware of their client's every action and approved them.
They said Ms. Leung's home in San Marino, a rich suburb just east of Los Angeles, was equipped with built-in microphones and video cameras that allowed American agents to spy on her Chinese house guests. "The F.B.I. fed information to her and encouraged her to give it to the People's Republic of China in order to obtain the trust of the P.R.C. and obtain information in return," according to the documents filed by Ms. Leung's lawyers. Underscoring what prosecutors said was Ms. Leung's vast wealth, she and her family had offered to post bail for as much as $2 million in property to secure her release. Her husband, brother and sister, all attended the hearing but declined to be interviewed.
Ms. Leung, who wore a green windbreaker jacket and navy blue sweat pants, was escorted into the courtroom in shackles. Her hair pulled back in a long ponytail, Ms. Leung appeared relaxed and confident. She often smiled when looking back at her relatives. Prosecutors provided some details of the sources of Ms. Leung's assets and the complex financial schemes they said she used to hide them.
For starters, they said Ms. Leung had received $1.7 million for work and expenses as an informer for the F.B.I. in which she provided the agency with secret material on the Chinese government over 20 years. Ms. Leung, who is fluent in Cantonese, Mandarin and English, also was paid $1.2 million in 1995 and 1996 for negotiating a deal that allowed Nortel Telecommunications to do business in China, prosecutors said.
As Nortel's representative, Ms. Leung, who used the business name "Merry Glory" for the deal, received 3 percent of any contract that she obtained for Nortel, they said. Prosecutors said a review of Ms. Leung's personal tax returns showed that she reported neither the F.B.I. payments nor the Nortel payments as income on her on federal income tax filing, as required by the Internal Revenue Service. According to an affidavit filed by federal prosecutors in connection with the bail hearing, Ms. Leung admitted to the authorities that she had two bank accounts in Hong Kong under the name Merry Glory and Right Fortune.
The accounts were used "to create the appearance of a separate creditor to which she made mortgage payments when in fact she was paying herself," the document stated. Ms. Leung bought her home in San Marino about 12 years ago for $1.4 million, prosecutors said. She made a down payment of half that amount and financed the balance.
She deposited payments from Nortel in her Right Fortune account and used the money to pay off the balance of her mortgage. "This created the appearance she had refinanced with another company and enabled her to falsely claim mortgage interest deductions for her residence after she had in fact paid her mortgage in full," the affidavit said. Nancy Mathis, a spokeswoman for the Internal Revenue Service in Washington, said that because of privacy laws that protect all taxpayers the agency could not comment on whether it would investigate Ms. Leung in connection with tax fraud.
Spy Suspect May Have Told Chinese of Bugs, U.S. Says
By JAMES RISEN and ERIC LICHTBLAU
ASHINGTON, April 14 — Counterintelligence officials fear that an F.B.I. informer in Los Angeles tipped off the Chinese government to a covert United States effort to plant listening devices aboard China's version of Air Force One, several government officials said today.
The National Security Agency, the supersecret eavesdropping agency, working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other intelligence organizations, led an operation to plant bugs in a Boeing 767 used by the president of China while it was in the United States for refitting, officials said. The listening devices were quickly discovered, and the Chinese government disclosed the incident early last year.
United States officials have never previously acknowledged the bugging operation, and the Bush administration still publicly declines to comment.
Intelligence officials say they are trying to determine whether the Chinese found out about the operation as a result of an F.B.I. security breach that was disclosed last week with the arrest of Katrina Leung, who officials described as a Chinese double agent, and James J. Smith, a former F.B.I. agent in Los Angeles who was her contact at the bureau. The two had a long-term sexual relationship, court documents said.
Officials familiar with the investigation said that if the bugging operation was compromised as a result of the F.B.I. case, it would be one of the most damaging losses associated with it.
National Security Agency officials are said to be furious that F.B.I. officials involved in planning the bugging operation did not tell them of their suspicions that the bureau had been penetrated by China.
Mr. Smith, who was the top expert on Chinese counterintelligence in the F.B.I.'s Los Angeles field office from 1996 until his retirement in November 2000, has been questioned about the bugging operation by the F.B.I., people close to the case said today. When the agents first interrogated Mr. Smith several months ago about his relationship with Ms. Leung, the Chinese plane was one of several issues they were keenly interested in pursuing.
"That was obviously a hot button issue," said an official who demanded anonymity.
The F.B.I. theorized that Mr. Smith's "pillow talk" with Ms. Leung might have included rumors about the intelligence community's efforts to bug the plane. Mr. Smith adamantly denied having discussed the case with Ms. Leung, and his lawyer, Brian Sun, said today that there was "absolutely not" a connection. "My client flat-out did not talk about the plane with her," he said.
The case widened late last week when another former F.B.I. agent, who has not been charged in the case, resigned his post as chief of security at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory after it was revealed that he had an extended sexual relationship with Ms. Leung. Although he was not named in court documents, several officials identified William Cleveland as the former San Francisco agent. In addition, the F.B.I. has opened an investigation involving an active F.B.I. agent in Los Angeles in connection with Chinese intelligence operations, officials said.
In January 2002, Chinese officials said that they had discovered that China's presidential aircraft had been bugged after it was refurbished in the United States. The Chinese said that they had found 27 listening devices on board, including some in the bathroom and in the headboard of the Chinese president's bed. China bought the airplane in June 2000 for $120 million, and it was sent to San Antonio International Airport for refitting by several contractors. It was delivered to the Chinese government in August 2001.
The Chinese said that they had discovered the listening devices in October 2001, soon after accepting delivery on the plane.
Law enforcement officials today played down the possibility of a connection between the F.B.I. case and the airplane operation, and said that senior F.B.I. officials were not certain that a link would be found.
Yet officials said they were still in the beginning phases of their investigation of the F.B.I. case, and so it will take more time to determine the full extent of any damage to national security. The F.B.I. and the Justice Department are conducting separate investigations into the case, as investigators examine what secrets Ms. Leung may have given up and what management problems at the F.B.I. may have allowed the problem to go undetected .
"We have to look at everything," a senior law enforcement official said today. "No conclusions have been reached. We'll have to go through a whole assessment of what she knew."
Still, F.B.I. officials are skeptical of what Mr. Smith has told them. Prosecutors noted in court filings last week that Mr. Smith denied having an affair with Ms. Leung, only to be contradicted by tapes that recorded the pair in a hotel.
Mr. Smith was Ms. Leung's F.B.I. handler for nearly 20 years, and the two had an affair for almost as long, court documents said. Ms. Leung was a highly paid F.B.I. informer, but prosecutors now say that she took classified documents from Mr. Smith, photocopied them, and passed them to handlers in Beijing.
Mr. Smith was also active in investigating accusations that the Chinese tried to buy influence in the 1996 Clinton-Gore campaign. Law enforcement officials said Ms. Leung was a key informer in the campaign finance investigations, and they are concerned that she could have compromised the politically charged case by telling the Chinese where the investigation was heading.
Lawyers for Ms. Leung said in a court filing late today in Los Angeles that the government's case was "skimpy." While the lawyers acknowledged that Ms. Leung, a prominent political fund-raiser, did give information to the People's Republic of China, they said it always was at the behest of the F.B.I.
"The F.B.I. controlled everything she did," Janet Levine, a lawyer for Ms. Leung, said in the filing. "The F.B.I. fed information to her and encouraged her to give it to the P.R.C. in order to obtain the trust of the P.R.C. and obtain information in return. For over 20 years, she was used and controlled by the F.B.I."
Defense lawyers argued that Ms. Leung, now being held without bail, should be freed on a bond of $250,000. They argued further that it was unfair for the courts to have granted Mr. Smith bail last week while declaring Ms. Leung a flight risk and ordering her held pending trial. A bail hearing is set for Tuesday in Los Angeles.
F.B.I. Was Told Years Ago of Possible Double Agent
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
ASHINGTON, April 11 — Senior F.B.I. officials were told in the early 1990's that a Los Angeles woman accused this week of being a double-agent appeared to be spying for the Chinese, but they continued using her as an informer nonetheless, current and former officials said today.
Around 1991, senior Federal Bureau of Investigation counterintelligence officials met in Washington to discuss evidence that the woman, Katrina Leung, was spying for the Chinese, an official said today on condition of anonymity.
One F.B.I. supervisor in Los Angeles attending the meeting was James J. Smith, who was having an long-term affair with Ms. Leung after recruiting her to the bureau as an informer in the early 1980's. They were arrested this week on espionage-related charges.
An administration official who demanded anonymity said it was also "common knowledge" for years among senior people in the bureau's Los Angeles office that Mr. Smith and Ms. Leung were having an affair and that F.B.I. officials at headquarters suspected that there might be a Chinese intelligence "penetration" of the bureau on the West Coast.
Indeed, officials said today that they were investigating the possibility of a separate security breach involving China and another agent in the bureau's Los Angeles office.
The F.B.I.'s handling of the long-held suspicions surrounding Mr. Smith and Ms. Leung and whether it moved aggressively enough to head off the problem will be a major focus of inquiries by the bureau and the Justice Department, officials said.
Investigators are also trying to determine what information on nuclear, military and political issues she gave to China and what damage it may have caused to national security.
The bureau declined to comment today on questions about when senior officials at headquarters first became aware of suspicions in the case. "That's one of the things we're looking into as part of our oversight review: how the whole Smith and Leung matter was handled," an F.B.I. official, who spoke only on the condition of anonymity, said.
But other current and former officials say that if it is demonstrated that senior bureau officials had evidence for years pointing to Ms. Leung's activities, the bureau is sure to face difficult questions about why it did not take aggressive steps until recently.
One theory, officials said, is that officials were trying to use Ms. Leung to pass disinformation back to her native China without realizing that she had access through her affair with Mr. Smith to very sensitive material.
"There are really two possibilities," said William Baker, who was a high-ranking F.B.I. official until 1991 but said that as chief of the criminal division he had no knowledge of the case. "You're either talking about gross dereliction of duty at F.B.I. headquarters and the L.A. field office, or the F.B.I. wanted to play her back on China, and it just backfired on them, because they were played themselves. Either way, it didn't work, and the outcome was horrible."
Mr. Baker said bureau officials in Los Angeles should have been particularly sensitive to the dangers of an agent becoming too close to an informer because in 1990 a former agent, Richard W. Miller, was convicted on charges of passing information to Moscow through his Russian lover. "The red flag should have been the Miller case," Mr. Baker said.
Mr. Smith was allowed to be Ms. Leung's so-called handler from the early 1980's until his retirement in late 2000, and officials said the two had an affair for about 18 years. The bureau paid her $1.7 million as an informer to provide information on China.
The Justice Department acknowledged in court documents unsealed on Wednesday that a second F.B.I. agent in San Francisco who was also having an affair with the woman became aware in 1991 about an audiotape indicating that Ms. Leung had unauthorized contacts with officials in the Chinese intelligence agency and was passing information to them.
The San Francisco agent alerted Mr. Smith in Los Angeles; an alarmed Mr. Smith assured him that he would take care of the problem, prosecutors said. The second former agent, who is unidentified in court papers but whom law enforcement officials identified as William Cleveland, resigned on Thursday as head of security at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory after the lab began investigating the case.
Prosecutors suggested that only the two agents knew about the suspicions surrounding Ms. Leung, but officials said in interviews today that knowledge of the case extended to senior officials at the bureau.
"The F.B.I. chain of command was fully aware of the '91 report indicating that she was talking about things with China that she should not have been talking about," an official who spoke on condition of anonymity said. "Headquarters knew she had unauthorized contacts and communications with people in China. There were memos generated."
Officials said Robert S. Mueller III, director of the F.B.I. became aware of the case through back channels in late 2001 and dispatched senior counterintelligence people to do a full investigation. Last year, he demoted Sheila Horan, who was leading the national security division, because he was upset about how the case was handled, officials said.
Lawyers for Ms. Leung and Mr. Smith have defended their clients' character and pledged vindication. Brian Sun, a lawyer for Mr. Smith, said it was irresponsible for the Justice Department to try to pin full responsibility on the former agent.
"The bureau was fully aware from at least 1991 of the potential risks of using Ms. Leung as an asset," or informer, Mr. Sun said in an interview. "It's unfair to try to portray Mr. Smith as the only person responsible for the F.B.I.'s failure to follow up on this matter. If J. J. Smith committed acts of gross negligence, then the entire counterintelligence office of the F.B.I. was equally culpable."
After Espionage Arrests, F.B.I. Looks Back and Wonders, 'How?'
By DEAN E. MURPHY and CALVIN SIMS
OS ANGELES, April 10 — With expensive jade jewelry, a big smile and an unshakable air of confidence, Katrina Leung always made an impression when she entered a room.
Now, as Ms. Leung faces accusations of passing secrets to the Chinese government, many associates say they are wondering how much of her public persona was genuine.
She would never forget a name or a face, associates said, even remembering to ask one business acquaintance about his elderly mother whenever they met. Fluent in English, Mandarin and Cantonese, she made herself indispensable at Chinese-American events, said people who attended, breaking the ice and acting as a translator for people who could otherwise not communicate, while placing herself at the center of any group photograph.
And though a businesswoman, with her own consulting company, she appeared to well understand the power of politics and of playing both sides. She gave money to many prominent Republicans, including a former mayor of Los Angeles and two of California's United States Senate candidates, but also reached out to influential Democrats in a city dominated by the Democratic Party.
"She's a real spitfire," said Dorothy Perez, who worked for John Ferraro, a Democrat who was president of the Los Angeles City Council until his death two years ago. "She has the personality of a cheerleader, always going on about something. She was always trying to get people to visit China."
Ms. Leung, 49, who lives in a wealthy suburb, San Marino, was arrested Wednesday on charges of obtaining a classified national security document for the Chinese government. The Federal Bureau of Investigation said that Ms. Leung had had a 20-year affair with James J. Smith, a former F.B.I. agent who had recruited her as an informer, and that she had passed on information culled from Mr. Smith. Officials said she sometimes surreptitiously photocopied classified documents he had left unattended at her house.
Mr. Smith, 59, who worked for the F.B.I. for 30 years before retiring in 2000, was also arrested and charged with negligence. He was released on bail Wednesday night.
Ms. Leung's lawyers, Janet I. Levine and John D. Vandeveld, said in a statement that she would be found not guilty and called her "a loyal American citizen."
"For 20 years she has worked at the direction and behest of the Federal Bureau of Investigation," they said.
"She repeatedly endangered herself in order to make significant contributions to the security and well-being of the United States and her fellow citizens."
That Ms. Leung was friendly with the F.B.I. was no secret in the Asian-American community here. She would often introduce F.B.I. agents at dinners and receptions she held for Chinese dignitaries, including those associated with the Los Angeles Guangzhou Sister City Association, which she promoted.
In the cold war era, some participants at the events saw the agents as protection, but later the continued F.B.I. presence struck some as odd. Among the agents who attended some of the events was Mr. Smith. Both Mr. Smith and Ms. Leung are married to others.
"Especially at the beginning, it was good to have someone to protect us in case anything went wrong," said one board member of the sister city association. Of Mr. Smith, the board member said: "I didn't know who invited him. You don't usually see F.B.I. agents. He seemed very nice. He was at most of the dinners. I never questioned it."
In 1997, when a big celebration was held in a college stadium marking the handover of Hong Kong to the Chinese, Ms. Leung was joined in a V.I.P. section by a host of prominent Asian-Americans, Mayor Richard J. Riordan of Los Angeles and a dozen or so F.B.I. agents.
"She seemed to have a working relationship with F.B.I. agents in the same way she had a working relationship with elected officials, community leaders and Chinese-American leaders," said Ben Wong, a city councilman in West Covina, Calif., who attended the Hong Kong event. "She was someone who always seemed to know a lot of people."
Ms. Leung also had a knack for finding the most important, and often most affluent, person in a crowd, several business and political associates said. One prominent Los Angeles Republican fund-raiser said he spotted her at a ball in Washington during President Bush's inauguration. A White House official could not say today whether she had been invited to the inauguration. Ms. Leung also courted Democrats, inviting them to her home for a fund-raiser for Mr. Ferraro of the city council.
Though she was not necessarily seen as someone with her own political ambition, or someone who had particularly deep roots in the local Asian-American community, she developed a reputation as the conduit for business and trade with China.
It was in that capacity that she made her deepest inroads into Los Angeles political and social life, said Michael Woo, a former Los Angeles city councilman who ran unsuccessfully for mayor against Mr. Riordan in 1993. Mr. Woo, who is Chinese-American, said Ms. Leung sensed an opportunity when Mr. Riordan won the election, but had no strong ties or support in the Asian community.
"All of a sudden there was a sense in the Asian-American community of no connection at all to Mayor Riordan, and if anything there was some hostility toward him," Mr. Woo said. "It was a vacuum waiting for somebody to fill. She was one of the people to do that."
Mr. Woo said Ms. Leung was natural for that role in that she brought with her trade opportunities with China and the Pacific Rim, which in Los Angeles's fragmented ethnic politics served as an important entree at City Hall. Eventually, Ms. Leung traveled to China with Mr. Riordan to promote trade and later met in China with Mr. Riordan's successor, Mayor James K. Hahn.
"She always seemed very shrewd," Mr. Woo said. "In a political setting, frequently you have a candidate trying to size people up, and then you can see people at a dinner or other event trying to size people up. She was one of those people always trying to size people up."
Ada Chan Wong, president of the Los Angeles Chinese Chamber of Commerce, said that Ms. Leung was gracious in opening up her home for meetings and that she volunteered her time, once serving as a judge for the Miss Chinatown pageant.
"When there was anything political with China, she was the emcee," Ms. Wong said. "When the Chinese premier visited in 1999, she emceed the event."
Ms. Wong and others said Ms. Leung was always a bit mysterious about her business. She described herself as a venture capitalist, listing herself as self-employed on campaign finance documents. Officials said the F.B.I. paid her about $1.7 million over 20 years in expenses and fees as an informer.
"I never really did understand what she did for a living, just that she was rather flamboyant about her connections to the P.R.C.," Mr. Woo said.
According to an F.B.I. affidavit, Mr. Smith recruited Ms. Leung in the early 1980's and became her handler, seeking information about China. An F.B.I. agent who worked with Mr. Smith in Los Angeles said the agency's Los Angeles bureau was "in a state of shock" over the charges against him.
"We all knew him as a decent, upstanding agent with a distinguished record," Mr. Smith's colleague said. "We are stunned and still trying to figure out how he avoided detection for so long."
Mr. Smith, 59, joined the F.B.I. in 1970 after serving in the army in Vietnam. He began his career in the bureau's Salt Lake City office and transferred in 1971 to Los Angeles, where he initially handled national security matters. From 1978 until his retirement in 2000, Mr. Smith worked in the foreign counterintelligence squad, focusing on China. He became the supervisor of that squad in 1996.
Mr. Smith, who is married and has an adult son, lives in Westlake Village, Calif., just west of Los Angeles. Although voices could be heard inside the house today, no one answered the door.
Matt McLaughlin, a spokesman for the F.B.I.'s Los Angeles office, said the investigation would emphasize supervising agents who were responsible for monitoring Mr. Smith, adding, "We need to determine if there were systemic problems in the Los Angeles office or if certain personnel failed to follow established procedures."
Saddam's secret archives could be in Moscow: Report PTI[ WEDNESDAY, APRIL 09, 2003 07:07:34 PM ]
MOSCOW: Saddam Hussein's secret archives could already be in Moscow despite American Central Intelligence Agency's bid to block their evacuation by firing at the Russian diplomatic convoy near Baghdad on Sunday, media reported on Wednesday.
Quoting intelligence sources Nezavisimaya Gazeta on Wednesday reported that Sunday's attack by the US rangers on the Russian ambassador's convoy near Baghdad was a 'direct clash between Russian's Foreign Intelligence Service SVR and CIA.
Moscow had asked the US for safe passage from Baghdad to Syria for its ambassador's convoy and a "Predator" drone was hovering over it all along the way from the embassy in Baghdad transmitting live video pictures, the daily said ruling out any case of mistaken identity by the US troops which fired at it.
"CIA was under the impression that SVR was evacuating Saddam's secret archives under the diplomatic cover of ambassador's convoy... this also explains why at several occasions after the firing the American troops had tried to search Russian vehicles," Nezavisimaya Gazeta wrote.
It also noted that though the Iraqi escort vans were totally destroyed by the Americans along with their occupants, in case of the Russians they tried to put their vehicles out of order to prevent further movement.
"All the details we could learn only after fifty years in 2053, when SVR is expected to declassify its secret documents relating to the operation," Nezavisimaya Gazeta said.
April 4, 2003
Terrorism Task Force Detains an American Without Charges
By TIMOTHY EGAN
PORTLAND, Ore., April 3 - For the last two weeks, Maher Hawash, a
38-year-old software engineer and American citizen who was from the West
Bank and grew up in Kuwait, has been held in a federal prison here,
though he has not been charged with a crime or brought before a judge.
Relatives and friends of Mr. Hawash, who works for the Intel Corporation
and is married to a native Oregonian, say he has no idea why he was
arrested by a federal terrorism task force when he arrived for work at
the Intel parking lot in Hillsboro, a Portland suburb. The family home
was raided at dawn on the same day by nearly a dozen armed police
officers, who woke Mrs. Hawash and the family's three children, friends
said.
Mr. Hawash, who is known as Mike, has yet to be interrogated and is
being kept in solitary confinement, his supporters say.
Federal officials will not comment on Mr. Hawash, though they have been
pressed by Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, and by a group of
supporters led by a former Intel vice president, for basic information
about why he is being detained.
In a statement after his arrest, the F.B.I. said he was being held as a
material witness in an "ongoing investigation" by the Joint Terrorism
Task Force. Federal search warrants in the case are sealed.
The case has drawn the attention of civil liberties groups nationwide,
who say Mr. Hawash's case is an example of how the Bush administration
is holding a handful of American citizens without offering them normal
legal protection.
Although at least two American citizens are being held without normal
legal rights as "enemy combatants," Mr. Hawash has not been categorized
as such. As a material witness, he is being held to compel testimony.
But supporters say he has not been told anything about what the
government may want from him.
"Our friend has fallen into some kind of `Alice in Wonderland´ meets
Franz Kafka," said Steven McGeady, the former Intel executive, who
started a legal defense fund and a Web site for Mr. Hawash.
"You hear about this happening in other countries and to immigrants and
then to American citizens," Mr. McGeady went on. "And finally you hear
about it happening to someone you know. It's scary."
Mr. Hawash's family thought at first that his arrest was connected to
two donations he made three years ago to an Islamic charity, Global
Relief Foundation, whose assets were frozen last year when federal
authorities said it was linked to terrorism. But now relatives say the
contributions may not be related to his arrest, and he may be asked to
testify about six people charged here last year with aiding terrorism.
Asked about the charitable donations - which totaled a little more
than $10,000 - Mr. Hawash told the local newspaper, The Oregonian, in
November: "We believed that they are doing good work. It's a well-known
organization."
Civil liberties groups say material witness statutes are being abused by
the Bush administration to hold people like Mr. Hawash indefinitely.
"The government doesn't have and should not have the power to arrest and
detain someone without charging them," said Lucas Guttentag, director of
the American Civil Liberties Union's Immigrants Rights Project. "If this
kind of thing is permitted, then any United States citizen can be swept
off the street and locked up without being charged."
Since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the courts have made conflicting
rulings on the legality of holding material witnesses without charging
them. A federal judge in Manhattan, Shira A. Scheindlin, said such
detentions were "an illegitimate use of the statute," but another ruling
in the same court, by Chief Judge Michael B. Mukasey, said detaining
witnesses to compel testimony was a legitimate investigative tool.
Attorney General John Ashcroft has defended the tactic, saying it is
"vital to preventing, disrupting or delaying new attacks."
The Justice Department has not said how many Americans have been held
without charges in terrorism investigations since Sept. 11. Civil
liberties groups say they believe the number is about 20, though most
are not American citizens.
Mr. Hawash, who was born in Nablus in the West Bank, first came to the
United States in 1984, his family said, and graduated from the
University of Texas. He became an American citizen in 1988. He is
married to Lisa Hawash, a native of Roseburg, Ore. The Web site set up
by supporters, freemikehawash.org, founded by two former Intel
executives, shows a picture of Mr. Hawash's wife and three children.
Mr. Hawash has worked at Intel since 1992, though he was laid off in
2001 and rehired as a contract employee. Mr. McGeady, his boss there,
said Mr. Hawash went back to Nablus to visit his family several years
ago and had trouble returning to the United States until Intel officials
intervened.
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/04/international/worldspecial/04DETA.html?pag
ewanted=print&position=top
>
t's hard to believe that everything related to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks will not get the most thorough public scrutiny possible. But the federal investigative committee so reluctantly supported by the White House now seems in danger of being undermined. As the first hearings open in Manhattan today, committee members are chagrined to be going hat in hand to Congress for adequate financing. White House assurances led them to believe needed funds would be included in the supplemental war budget sent to the Capitol last week. But the commission's $11 million request was not there.
Reasonable people might wonder if the White House, having failed in its initial attempt to have Henry Kissinger steer the investigation, may be resorting to budgetary starvation as a tactic to hobble any politically fearless inquiry. The committee's mandate includes scrutiny of intelligence failures and eight other government areas.
The White House vows that in coming budget initiatives there will be no shortchanging of the nation's duty to face the facts of the tragedy. As things now stand, $3 million budgeted as start-up funding could run out this summer. An estimated $14 million is needed for the task of finding out precisely how the attackers were able to pull off their plot in which nearly 3,000 people died. This seems a bargain given the importance of the mission. By comparison, the inquiry into the shuttle disaster's loss of seven lives may cost an estimated $40 million, and the inquiry into the Whitewater controversy ate up more than $30 million.
The nation demands an unflinching 9/11 search. A forthright Congress could easily shake the money loose from the Capitol leadership. Everyone claims to have homeland security as a top priority, but anything less than a robust inquiry will amount to a fresh assault on domestic safety. Tim Roemer, a former congressman and a commission member now buttonholing old colleagues for the missing money, makes the case best: "Facing the facts won't kill us. Not getting them might."
Justice Dept.: FBI database info no longer has to be accurate
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department lifted a requirement Monday that the FBI ensure the accuracy and timeliness of information about criminals and crime victims before adding it to the country's most comprehensive law enforcement database.
The system, run by the FBI's National Crime Information Center, includes data about terrorists, fugitives, warrants, people missing, gang members and stolen vehicles, guns or boats.
Records are queried increasingly by the nation's law enforcement agencies to help decide whether to monitor, detain or arrest someone. The records are inaccessible to the public, and police have been prosecuted in U.S. courts for misusing the system to find, for example, personal information about girlfriends or former spouses.
Officials said the change, which immediately drew criticism from civil-liberties advocates, is necessary to ensure investigators have access to information that can't be confirmed but could take on new significance later, FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said.
The change to the 1974 U.S. Privacy Act was disclosed with an announcement published in the Federal Register.
The Privacy Act previously required the FBI to ensure information was "accurate, relevant, timely and complete" before it could be added to the system.
"It's a pretty big job to be accurate and complete," said Stewart Baker, a Washington lawyer who specializes in technology and surveillance issues. "On the other hand, these are potentially very significant records for people, and if it's not accurate and complete, it can mean trouble."
Critics urged Congress to review the change, arguing that information in the computer files was especially important because it can affect many aspects of a person's life.
"This is information that has always been stigmatizing, the type of data that can prevent someone from getting a job," said Marc Rotenberg of the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center. "When you remove the accuracy obligations, you open the door to the use of unreliable information."
Critics have noted complaints for years about wrong information in the computer files that disrupted the lives of innocent citizens, and the FBI has acknowledged problems. In one case, a Phoenix resident was arrested for minor traffic violations that had been quashed weeks earlier; in another, a civilian was misidentified as a Navy deserter.
The system "is replete with inaccurate, untimely information, but everybody does their best to keep it up to date," said Beryl Howell, former general counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee. "That's a goal we shouldn't just throw out."
In the change, the Justice Department said earlier restrictions on information "would limit the ability of trained investigators and intelligence analysts to exercise their judgment in reporting on investigations and impede the development of criminal intelligence necessary for effective law enforcement."
It added that, because the system collects its data from so many other organizations, "it is administratively impossible to ensure compliance."
By TED BRIDIS The Associated Press Tuesday, March 25, 2003; 5:14 AM
The Justice Department lifted a requirement Monday that the FBI ensure the accuracy and timeliness of information about criminals and crime victims before adding it to the country's most comprehensive law enforcement database.
The system, run by the FBI's National Crime Information Center, includes data about terrorists, fugitives, warrants, people missing, gang members and stolen vehicles, guns or boats.
Records are queried increasingly by the nation's law enforcement agencies to help decide whether to monitor, detain or arrest someone. The records are inaccessible to the public, and police have been prosecuted in U.S. courts for misusing the system to find, for example, personal information about girlfriends or former spouses.
Officials said the change, which immediately drew criticism from civil-liberties advocates, is necessary to ensure investigators have access to information that can't be confirmed but could take on new significance later, FBI spokesman Paul Bresson said.
The change to the 1974 U.S. Privacy Act was disclosed with an announcement published in the Federal Register.
The Privacy Act previously required the FBI to ensure information was "accurate, relevant, timely and complete" before it could be added to the system.
"It's a pretty big job to be accurate and complete," said Stewart Baker, a Washington lawyer who specializes in technology and surveillance issues. "On the other hand, these are potentially very significant records for people, and if it's not accurate and complete, it can mean trouble."
Critics urged Congress to review the change, arguing that information in the computer files was especially important because it can affect many aspects of a person's life.
"This is information that has always been stigmatizing, the type of data that can prevent someone from getting a job," said Marc Rotenberg of the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center. "When you remove the accuracy obligations, you open the door to the use of unreliable information."
Critics have noted complaints for years about wrong information in the computer files that disrupted the lives of innocent citizens, and the FBI has acknowledged problems. In one case, a Phoenix resident was arrested for minor traffic violations that had been quashed weeks earlier; in another, a civilian was misidentified as a Navy deserter.
The system "is replete with inaccurate, untimely information, but everybody does their best to keep it up to date," said Beryl Howell, former general counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee. "That's a goal we shouldn't just throw out."
In the change, the Justice Department said earlier restrictions on information "would limit the ability of trained investigators and intelligence analysts to exercise their judgment in reporting on investigations and impede the development of criminal intelligence necessary for effective law enforcement."
It added that, because the system collects its data from so many other organizations, "it is administratively impossible to ensure compliance."
---
On the Net: National Crime Information Center: http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cjisd/ncic.htm
Electronic Privacy Information Center: http://www.epic.org/
Will American Administration Declare War on Russia?
US officials think that Russia is guilty of their unsuccessful war
It is obvious today that the war in Iraq is not the kind of war that the American administration was intended to have. The strong resistance that Iraqi troops showed, Iraqi ABM systems and anti-tank facilities turned out to be an unexpected surprise for Americans.
As the American administration believed, the war turned out to be difficult on account of the fact that the Russian defense industry delivered anti-tank missiles to Iraq via third countries. As it was said, the Russian defense industry also supplied Iraq with night vision devices, and unique Kolchuga anti-missile systems. The US administration determined that Russia delivered those weapons to Iraq several days before the war was launched. The official note of protest on the part of the US Department of State was based on those illegal deliveries. The note of protest was handed over to the Russian ambassador to the USA, Yury Ushakov.
The Russian government did not ignore USA’s threats (in the form of certain statements) to punish Russia for arms deliveries. The Russian leadership realizes that the war menace is approaching the country. According to the information from competent military sources, the navy command finished checking the alertness of anti-submarine facilities of naval troops in Kamchatka. Military exercises were conducted in admirals’ presence. Diesel submarines of the Russian navy performed basic military exercises at sea. The order for battleships to travel to the Indian Ocean and to the Persian Gulf was called off.
Military units of the Russian Far East get ready for possible border conflicts. It seems that the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of Russia, President Vladimir Putin, realizes the anti-Russian essence of America’s aggressive aspiration. Putin takes measures to strengthen the alertness of Russian troops at the border territory. The Russian army and navy command held a secret session in Moscow yesterday, at which military high-ranking officials considered possible variants for the Mideast situation to develop. American spy planes have been conducting aerial reconnaissance at Russia’s borders for several days already.
Colonel-General Valery Manilov, a member of the Federation Council from the Primorye region, said in his interview to Echo of Moscow radio station: “The decision to start the war on Iraq is a big mistake that the United States made. America gave an incentive for the rest of the world to unite in the anti-American coalition. It is obvious from the diplomatic point of view that no country in the whole world will wish to live and watch Americans using the military force whenever they want and like it to use. The world community will have to consolidate its military, political, economic, technical resources in order not to allow that to happen. The process is under way already. This is a unique moment, for it never happened before, not even during the USA’s bombing of Yugoslavia. The world will have to unite and find a format to restrain America, the country, which opposed itself to the whole world.”
On the other hand, the beginning of the war is a drama for the USA itself. This is likely to provoke the collapse of the antiterrorist coalition, terrorist activities in the USA and in Great Britain might increase, arms race is likely to speed up, including the weapons of mass destruction race. Ecological catastrophes are likely to happen in the world as well. Before opposing the whole world, the United States and Great Britain made desperate steps to strengthen their activities for winning UN Security Council members and the world community over to their side. This means that George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice did their best not to let the USA have an aggressive image for the world community. The American administration suffered a diplomatic failure. Cheap and high-quality Iraqi oil is the prime goal of the game. Americans hope that the oil will allow them to settle their economic and financial issues. However, the price of that oil will be unacceptable for the USA. America’s image as a safe, stable and powerful country has been ruined. At present moment, the world perceives the USA as a country that is ready to disregard the opinion of the world for the sake of its own interests only. A large number of victims is not an issue at all.
Thousands of lives will have to be wasted for such hypothetical takeover of the Iraqi oil. Those lives will be the lives of American people too. As they say, if you sow wind you will rip a storm. The inferiority complex might also be a reason why the war began. This complex has been tormenting President Bush and his team – the people, who did not get to overthrow Saddam in 1991. Those people try to get rid of their complexes, including the September 11th complex, with the help of the military force. The inevitable failure of the incumbent American administration will be the result of that. You can conquer with bayonets, but you can’t sit on them.
Amid general stock market jitters, one British company linked to the American hawk Richard Perle and dealing with secret intelligence is among the few UK commercial organisations that stand to profit from the Iraq war and its accompanying worldwide terrorist alert.
The Cambridge-based Autonomy Corporation, with Mr Perle's help, is secretively selling advanced computer eavesdropping systems to intelligence agencies around the world.
Its software simultaneously monitors hundreds of thousands of intercepted emails and phone conversations while they are taking place.
It claims to turn patterns of conversation into "beams of light" of varying thickness on a screen, revealing anomalies that might be code phrases.
Clients to date are believed to include MI6 and GCHQ, the newly launched US department of homeland security in Washington, and intelligence agencies in Italy.
Mr Perle, long one of the most high-profile proponents of war with Iraq, is a director of Autonomy with an option on 75,000 of the company's shares - currently trading in the doldrums, far below the option price.
He advises the company on market opportunities, he told the Guardian from Washington. But he said he had no input into specific procurement decisions by US agencies.
Mr Perle, a former Pentagon appointee, was recruited by Autonomy shortly before the Bush administration came to power in 2000. His present position as chairman of the Pentagon's defence advisory board is not formally part of the US administration, and so he is not required to divest himself of commercial interests. But he has close contact with policymakers in the intelligence community.
Mr Perle has roamed the world promoting war against Saddam Hussein and linking him to the al-Qaida terrorist network. Such fears have caused an unprecedented surge in international intelligence activity.
Last September, for example, despite rebuttals by the FBI, Mr Perle insisted at a gathering of European and Israeli politicians in Italy that an Iraqi agent had met Mohammed Atta, one of the World Trade Centre hijackers, in Prague, with the inference that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11 attacks.
This month, Italian intelligence became the latest clients of Autonomy Corporation, spending an undisclosed sum to install the company's Idol (intelligent data operating layer). This followed further $1m (£640,000) contracts last December with US intelligence agencies, including the defence intelligence agency (military intelligence), the secret service (which protects the president) and reportedly also the NSA (satellite intelligence) and FBI.
The previous October, the US department of homeland security gave Autonomy a big contract. Autonomy says that almost a third of its £60m annual turnover comes from sales to intelligence agencies, but it is forbidden by many customers on security grounds from disclosing details.
At the beginning of the year, boasting of his company's profitability record, the chief executive, Mike Lynch, said in London that the threat of war in Iraq had helped sales to intelligence agencies, as "defence issues come more to mind, which frees up the mind to spend".
Autonomy's "beams of light" are based on mathematical algorithms that it claims can identify unusual patterns of conversation in any language, such as Arabic, in "real time". Conventional keyword recognition used by telephone-tap processing systems are easily defeated if a terrorist target avoids using words such as "bomb" or "Saddam".
Autonomy says its system can not only handle intercepted voice, text and video in any language, but can sort virtually any quantity of intercepts as they happen.
Mr Perle is engaged in a ferocious battle of words with the veteran US journalist Seymour Hersh, whom he has called a journalistic "terrorist". Mr Perle is threatening to sue Hersh in London for a recent New Yorker article in which he questioned Mr Perle's role in relation to Saudi Arabia in another venture capital company, Trireme, and quoted Saudis alleging he was misusing his business connections.
Mr Perle said Hersh's allegations about Trireme were "outrageous slander". He had lunched with the arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and another Saudi as the article reported, he said, purely to discuss information they had offered about the possibility of President Saddam agreeing to surrender. He added: "I did not say anything of a business nature."
Mr Perle would find it much more difficult to sue for libel in the US, where comment in good faith about public figures is virtually unrestricted.
The United States it seems the condemned to today wage the war to his circustanciales allies of yesterday. Noriega and Cedras, for example, were their creation, and to both it had to remove them with individual invasions. Osama bin Ladem, is another example. It was trained by the company to fight to the Russians in Afghanistan. And now he is its staunch enemy.
HISTORY
Now the turn is of Sadam Husseim, sátrapa Iraqian to that EU armed and used to attack and to neutralize the threat of the Iran of ayatolah in 1980 country that, with the same North American arsenal that did of the army of Shah Reza Palevi the fourth most powerful one of the world, represented a threat for the equilibrium of forces in the region.
PANAMA
Petroleum initiates its scaling, with injurious effects for the economy. Now it is that they lack the hydroelectric ones, whose construction as much we expanded! The MEF calculates in more of B/. 300 million the losses if the war is extended. And while it is declared alerts orange, we it has left more than to envy to Switzerland, done invisible in this crisis, without saying nothing, neither to favor nor against nobody, reiterating its policy of absolute neutrality.
GUERRA Estados Unidos parece condenado a hacer la guerra hoy a sus aliados circustanciales de ayer. Noriega y Cedras, por ejemplo, fueron su creación, y a ambos tuvo que removerlos con sendas invasiones. Osama bin Ladem, es otro ejemplo. Fue entrenado por la CIA para combatir a los rusos en Afganistán. Y ahora es su acérrimo enemigo.
HISTORIA Ahora el turno es de Sadam Husseim, sátrapa iraquí a quien EU armó y usó para atacar y neutralizar la amenaza del Irán de los ayatolah en 1980 país que, con el mismo arsenal norteamericano que hizo del ejército del Sha Reza Palevi el cuarto más poderoso del mundo, representaba una amenaza para el equilibrio de fuerzas en la región.
PANAMÁ El petróleo inicia su escalada, con efectos nocivos para la economía. ¡Ahora es que faltan las hidroeléctricas, cuya construcción tanto dilatamos! El MEF calcula en más de B/. 300 millones las pérdidas si la guerra se alarga. Y mientras se declara alerta naranja, no nos queda más que envidiar a Suiza, hecha invisible en esta crisis, sin decir nada, ni a favor ni en contra de nadie, reiterando su política de neutralidad absoluta.
16 Mar 2003 18:02 Bin Laden visited Brazil border area in 1995-report
BRASILIA, Brazil, March 16 (Reuters) - Osama bin Laden passed through Brazil's border area with Argentina and Paraguay in 1995, a leading weekly magazine reported this weekend, citing Brazilian military intelligence sources.
Bin Laden, who the United States blamed for being behind the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington, met with the Arab community in Brazil's town of Foz do Iguacu during his brief visit, the weekly Veja reported.
The so-called triple border area where Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay meet has long been suspected of harboring militants, or providing safe haven and financing for them.
Suspicions have focused on the Iranian-backed Hizbollah group, and since the Sept. 11 attacks the United States has asked the region's authorities to step up surveillance of the area.
Brazil says there is no evidence of "terrorist" activities in the region.
Veja said there was a videotape of bin Laden participating in meetings at a mosque in the area during his brief visit. He was reported to have entered Brazil from Argentina.
Brazilian police said last week they believe another prominent member of bin Laden's al Qaeda network, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, also traveled to the region in 1995. Mohammed was captured in Pakistan this month.
Veja said Brazil had passed on the information of the visits by the two militants to U.S. authorities in 1998 after two U.S. embassies in Africa were bombed. Al Qaeda is suspected to have been behind the attacks.