Perry,

I wish our country can maintain peace and order and really I wanted to retired in our country,with little pensions and SS, I could live like a commissioner in any govt. agency.

Ben Pablo

==================================

Dear Dr. Javier,

While we are working on the RIF, I would like to suggest if we can work on the acceptance of our Medicare/Medicaid in the Philippines.  I know that Dr. Edong formerly from Guam and now resides in Japan, had been in the forefront on this issue, but I don't think our community is listening to him.  If we can convince the US policy makers that it is cheaper on the part of the US Government to allow us to retire in the Philippines, than in the U.S., then it will help the project.

Do you have new about this?

Best regards.

Ernesto Gange, Pennsylvania

==================================

I have heard discouraging stories about health care in the Philippines. Hospitals have no medicines, no beddings and other conveniences needed by the sick.  Arroyo should look into this problem and resolve it quick before selling the idea of retirement in the Philippines.

Presy Guevara

The reasons for performing pre-employment background

Investigations extend far beyond the legalities and potential

Exposure a wrong employee can create.

Whether your company is large, small or any size in-between, it only takes one news-making incident concerning an employee, or even an ex-employee, to do significant damage to your reputation.

With the emergence of new case laws in many states, your hiring decisions, and even your referrals after an employee leaves, could expose your company to lawsuits and time in court that may ultimately lead to unsavory press coverage, further damaging your reputation.

Keeping your company’s reputation in mind, employers need to be aware of two significant legal issues that are emerging with the potential to affect us all.

Under the doctrine of negligent hiring, employers are being held liable for the criminal acts of their employees.  Under the doctrine of negligent referral, they are being held liable for not revealing important information about former employees.

In both cases, the pre-employment background investigation has evolved as the pivotal factor.  Let’s first look at negligent hiring, by examining the following cases:

In an Ohio case, Stephens v. A-Able Rents Company, a delivery person employed by the defendant brutally assaulted and attempted to rape a customer while delivering furniture to her home.

The employee had signed from his prior employment after refusing to take a drug test and after admitting to having a substance abuse problem.  The court ruled that the rental company could be held negligent because it should have learned about the employee’s substance abuse problem as part of its pre-employment background investigation.

The Court of Appeals allowed a negligent hiring claim for compensatory and punitive damages to proceed to trial.  Considering the issue of punitive damages, the Stephens court stated:

“This court believes the failure to conduct the pre-employment investigation directly contributed to the violence perpetrated on (the plaintiff).  Consequently, A-Able Rents showed a conscious disregard for the rights and safety of others.”

In a Delaware Superior Court case, Saxon v. Harvey & Harvey, a woman and her son were struck by a vehicle, killing the son and injuring the woman.  A jury found that the truck driver had several previous traffic convictions, including reckless driving.

The family won its negligent hiring lawsuit.  More importantly, had a routine background check been performed, this tragedy could have been avoided.

A Washington state Superior Court considered a case where a nine-year-old girt was raped by a janitor in the building where the child’s day care center was located.  The janitor was hired despite the fact that he had previously served time in prison for child molestation.

A routine pre-employment background check would have revealed the prior conviction.

The cost to the child is immeasurable.  The cost to the building management is uncertain since the parents have filed a negligent hiring lawsuit.

Ascertaining Backgrounds

The common thread running through these and most other negligent hiring cases is the duty now placed upon employers to ascertain the backgrounds of potential employees prior to placing those individuals on the payroll.

This legal duty extends beyond a thorough interview of the employee and should include a check of references, prior employers, and public record sources.

Negligent hiring cases have clearly created a need for employers to thoroughly investigate the backgrounds of potential employees.  Public record sources are a good start, but not all criminal activity becomes a public record.

For instance, in the Stephens case, the employee’s substance abuse problem was not a matter of public record.  Instead of being fired, he was allowed to resign.

Indeed, most claims of sexual harassment, theft, workplace violence of substance abuse are resolved internally and a public record never filed.  The most vital information can only be obtained through an exchange of information between the potential employer and the former employer.

But many employers refuse to provide sensitive or derogatory information, fearing a defamation suit from the former employee.

They offer only what is called a standard reference to confirm job titles and dates.  They refuse to give qualitative information – such as drug abuse histories – to prospective employers who would gain valuable insight from this data.

But this will no longer be possible because more and more employers are being sued under the negligent referral doctrine, which holds an employer accountable for not revealing critical information.

Consider the highly publicized Florida case of Firemen’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co.  In this case, Paul Calden shot three employees at the Firemen’s Fund Insurance Co. before killing himself.  Relatives of the deceased sued Calden’s former employer – Allstate – for giving Firemen’s standard job reference on Calden.  Allstate had failed to mention that Calden had been fired from Allstate for carrying a gun to work, that he believed he was an alien, or that he wrote the word “blood” next to the names of his co-workers.  The families claimed that Allstate had a duty to disclose the former employee’s problems during a job reference interview.

Negligent hiring cases have clearly created a need for open, honest sharing of employment information.  Yet the threat of defamation suits has caused many employers to refrain from revealing critical information.

Factor in the growing trend of negligent referral suits, and the current situation becomes

an absolute quagmire for employers – “Damned if you do and damned if you don’t.”

The negligent hiring cases force companies to screen potential employees and create a need for a free flow of information between past and prospective employers.  The negligent referral cases require the disclosure of sensitive information to prospective employers.  Yet the threat of a defamation action lingers as another source of exposure.

many employers have expressed their displeasure at this no-win scenario.

Legislators seem to agree.  Twenty-six states have now enacted legislation granting employer’s qualified immunity from suits in connection with providing information to a prospective employer.

These state laws now protect employers from exposure provided that they are acting in good faith.  The free exchange of information is so vital that many states are expected to follow suit.

First and foremost, employers should adopt a companywide policy to conduct pre-employment investigations for all positions.  Investigations can be scaled to match the position level and budgeted for.

These investigations should include a public records check and a reference from the employee’s past employer.  A free flow of information, in both directions, should be encouraged.

By adopting a mandatory investigation policy, an employer can minimize exposure for the negligent hiring of new employees.  Consider it an insurance policy against hiring the wrong people and include it in the cost of doing business, as you would other corporate insurance policies.

Investigators at one company found that approximately 17 percent of the applicants for employment have questionable items in their backgrounds.  These findings included misrepresentation, criminal backgrounds, abuse (domestic violence), credit history problems, fabrications of employment dates or fraudulent reasons for leaving the previous job.

Background checks are absolutely vital if:

·          Your company is involved in technology, has proprietary information or deals with confidential documents.

·          You are hiring for a high-level position where the employee will have access to sensitive information or competitive data. 

·          The position will have any involvement with financial records, accounts payable, receivables or payroll.

·          The employee will have access to corporate computer networks.

·          The position interfaces with the public.

·          You are hiring employees in the health care industry.

·          You are hiring employees who come in contact with children.

There are several levels of background checks.  A full inquiry typically includes verification of education, professional licensing, employment histories, and other data listed on an employee application.

It also includes supervisory and personal reference interviews, as well as a review of civil and criminal court records at the county and federal level.  Depending on the position applied for, it is also recommended that a person’s credit and driver’s history be reviewed.  The process usually takes from three to five days, depending on the thoroughness of the investigation.  Cost is also determined by the scope of the inquiry.

To comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act, each applicant must be made aware that a background check will be performed, and a release must be signed to permit the investigation.

The release provides the employer with express authorization to perform the investigation.  However, if an applicant refuses, the employer is wise to question why.

The reasons for performing pre-employment background investigations extend beyond the legalities and the potential exposure an unchecked employee can create.  The safety and welfare of your clients and employees is at stake as well.

Placing a dangerous employee into your work force or into the homes of your customers can cause tragic results.  The most devastating aspect of these cases is the knowledge that they could easily have been prevented.

Pre-Employment Background Checks

Here are some commonly asked questions about pre-employment background checks:

What are my legal reasons for conducting a background check?

There is no law that requires a company to conduct pre-employment investigations.  However, every company has the responsibility to protect its employees, and its reputation.  Companies today are at risk of negligent hiring lawsuits if they fail to meet these obligations.

What precautions must I take to ensure the investigations are performed correctly?

The best precaution is to hire a professional investigative firm.  Quality and accuracy should be their primary concern.  Employers should seek out references and request test cases before choosing a vendor.

Should cost be a factor in determining which investigative firm to hire?

In reality, cost is a factor in every business decision we make today, when comparing investigative services, however, higher costs should mean more comprehensive reporting.  Fees for an investigative can range from $50 to several hundred dollars, depending on the scope of the investigation.

Will the potential employee find out about the investigations?

If an outside firm is engaged to conduct the investigation, each applicant must sign a release before that inquiry can be initiated.  This is in accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Will a highly qualified applicant be insulted by a background investigation?

It is difficult to predict behavior; however, high-level applicants should be agreeable to an investigation.  If an applicant strongly protests, this could be a warning sign that the individual’s credentials may not be exactly as they were presented.

How long does it take to conduct an investigation?

A typical background check normally takes three to five days to complete.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Overseas Class
Millions working abroad help their nation get by, but not prosper. It's a life of lonely, risky sacrifice.
By Richard C. Paddock, Times Staff Writer

They nurse the sick in California, drive fuel trucks in Iraq, sail cargo ships through the Panama Canal and cruise ships through the Gulf of Alaska. They pour sake for Japanese salarymen and raise the children of Saudi businessmen.

They are the Philippines' most successful export: its workers.
Three decades ago, seeking sources of hard currency and an outlet for a fast-growing population, then-President Ferdinand Marcos encouraged Filipinos to find jobs in other countries. Over time, the overseas worker has become a pillar of the economy. Nine million Filipinos, more than one out of every 10, are working abroad. Every day, more than 3,100 leave the country.

Philippine workers sent home more than $10.7 billion last year, equal to about 12% of the gross domestic product.

The current president, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, calls them "the backbone of the new global workforce" and "our greatest export."

Worldwide, these workers have earned a reputation for enterprise and hard work. They include some of the Philippines' most talented people, well educated and multilingual.

But as a third generation leaves to work abroad, it is clear the system has not led to prosperity. Policymakers have focused on easing the flow of workers rather than harnessing their earnings for economic development.

Dependence on the export of people has become a formula for stagnation. Once one of the strongest in Asia, the Philippine economy now ranks near the bottom. The government invests little money in manufacturing, education or healthcare. The economy can't create even the 1.5 million jobs a year needed to keep up with population growth.

"We have a middle class, but they don't live in the Philippines," said Doris Magsaysay Ho, head of a company that dispatches 18,000 workers a year to serve on ships around the world.

Filipinos work in every country except North Korea, said Labor Secretary Patricia Santo Tomas, whose brother is a doctor in Orange County. More than 2.5 million work in the United States and nearly a million in Saudi Arabia.

The money they earn trickles into towns and villages, helping build houses, open restaurants and send children to school. But the absence of so many industrious and skilled people — mothers and fathers, engineers and entrepreneurs — exacts a heavy toll.

Across the Philippines, children are being raised by their grandparents. "Now children can buy a lot of computer games, but they don't have a mother or father, or both," Santo Tomas said.

For the sake of supporting their families, the overseas workers endure years of loneliness. Some, especially maids in the Middle East, suffer beatings and sexual abuse. In countries such as Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, they are jailed for running away. Yet the Philippines has grown so dependent on remittances that the thought of doing without them is frightening.

"Money from abroad is the only thing that keeps the economy in motion," said Ding Lichauco, former head of the country's economic planning office. "If you don't encourage the employees to go overseas, you will have revolution."



Providing sailors, maids, entertainers and other workers for a growing world market is a big business.

In this competitive arena, the Philippines has an advantage. Many Filipinos speak English. They are generally better educated than workers from countries such as Bangladesh, Sri Lanka or Indonesia. And they have a reputation for being good-natured.

An entire bureaucracy has been created around them. The Philippine Overseas Employment Administration helps find jobs in other countries, encourages workers to go abroad and processes some job applications.

The Technical Education and Skills Development Agency offers free training in welding, driving heavy trucks and other skills. The Overseas Workers Welfare Administration stations diplomats around the world to look after the Philippines' foreign workers.

Those who bring or send their earnings home pay no income taxes. And the government offers returning workers low-cost equipment and tools to help them start small businesses.

With that level of encouragement, an industry has developed to match workers and jobs.

There are more than 1,500 licensed recruiting agencies. Some provide training — six months for dancers, four months for seafarers, two weeks for housekeepers — in return for a cut of the worker's earnings.

A cook on a cargo ship can make more than Arroyo's official salary of $1,000 a month. A bar singer in Japan can earn more than a Philippine senator. But the fees can run into the thousands of dollars; the better the job, the greater the cost.

Dozens of agencies in Manila's Ermita district attract job seekers from all over the country. Applicants line up on the streets, luggage in hand, ready to go anywhere.

Notaries sit at small wooden desks on the sidewalk. Using manual typewriters, they help workers fill out the 14 documents they are required to submit. Large copy machines on the sidewalk crank out duplicates.

Laboratories conduct blood, tuberculosis and drug tests to certify the workers' health. Nearby are cellphone shops, money changers, cheap hotels and restaurants.

Many Arab countries, with their vast oil wealth and relatively small populations, are hungry for workers.

The CDK International Manpower Services posted notices in its window seeking domestic workers and midwives in the Middle East, a gift wrapper in Dubai and a "magician balloon decorator" elsewhere in the United Arab Emirates. The agency was also recruiting workers for Burger King and Starbucks outlets in the Middle East. ("Must have fashion for coffee," the ad for Starbucks said.)

Another company operating in the Middle East wanted diesel mechanics, flower arrangers, structural engineers, wedding card designers, massage therapists, website designers, accountants and nannies.

In another neighborhood, three blocks from the U.S. Embassy, a crowded sidewalk serves as an informal hiring hall for sailors. The Philippines produces nearly 25% of the world's seafaring workers, more than any other nation.

Hundreds of would-be sailors were hanging around in the shade of the leafy narra trees as agents wandered by, holding up signs offering jobs on ships sailing from Germany, Argentina, Los Angeles or Greece. Some sought engineers and first mates for cargo ships. Others needed chefs and waiters for cruises.

A salesman offered small vials of python oil, guaranteed to cure back pain, heart disease, joint dislocation, rheumatism, cough, arthritis and skin disease.

Merchants offered CDs providing instruction on how to moor a ship, plan a voyage, speak "maritime English" and handle hazardous materials.

Freddie Vicedo spent three decades at sea, earning enough to build a house 20 miles south of Manila and send his children to school. Now past the mandatory retirement age of 50, he was seeking one last job.

"It's OK to be away if it provides you with a home and a future," he said. "It's better than living all together in poverty."



The teeming neighborhood of Antipolo in central Manila is one of the city's poorest. Thousands of families live along the railroad tracks in shanties of scrap wood and metal built one on top of the other, three stories high. Families sleep seven or eight to a room and cook over open fires between the tracks. Every month or so, someone is hit by a train.

Children play in garbage. Old women play mah-jongg on a rickety table. A woman patiently picks lice from a girl's hair.

It is not uncommon for families to hold a wake in the middle of the sweltering streets, as Danilo Paredes did for his 18-year-old daughter, Raquel. Lying in an open coffin placed on a table, she looked small for her age, but at peace amid the chaos. Paredes said he didn't know what killed her, only that he didn't have the $25 for the medicine the doctor prescribed.

Residents look for any way out.

"I hate this place," said Mary Grace Libao, 13. She and her friend, Clarivel de los Santos, also 13, said they wanted to be singers in Japan.

"In Japan I will make enough money to buy a house for my family," Clarivel said.

Thousands of Philippine musicians and singers perform at resorts and hotels from Bali, Indonesia; to Phuket, Thailand; to Tokyo. Many young women who go abroad as entertainers end up working in the sex trade.

All over Japan, salarymen come to Philippine pubs to escape the tedium and stress of their jobs. They drink sake and sing karaoke with "japayuki," beautiful, scantily clad young women.

In Osaka, the Philippine clubs are concentrated in the crowded Dotonburi district. Many are controlled by Japanese organized crime. Customers spend as much as $500 an evening in one of the better establishments.

Large clubs typically stage a brief show in which the women sing a few songs and dance. The rest of the time, they flirt with the customers, pouring sake, feeding them and lighting their cigarettes. They can make more in tips in an evening than they could working for a month as a salesclerk back home. They can make even more if they agree to have sex.

"The customers make offers," said Estrella Pumar, 31, who was heading from Manila to Osaka for her second tour. "It's up to the girls to decide what kind of life to live."

The women live six or seven to a room provided by their employers. If they are lucky, they get a day off every two weeks. Many aspire to marry a Japanese man and secure a residency permit. Having a child in Japan ensures residency status after a divorce, which is how 80% of these marriages end.

Wendy, 37, followed her mother to Japan in the 1990s. A brother and sister moved to Los Angeles. She spent 10 years working in pubs before marrying a Japanese man, having a son and opening her own club in Osaka, the Twin Angels.

"It's better to be here than in the Philippines," said Wendy, who declined to give her full name. But someday she'd like to return home and perhaps open a McDonald's. In the meantime, she said, "we have to survive."



The wards are overflowing at Negros Oriental Provincial Hospital, and dozens of patients lie on cots in the corridors. Some have just given birth. Others have just had surgery. Some will die in the hallway.

The hospital in Dumaguete, about 400 miles south of Manila, was built for 250 patients but usually has more than 350. Newborns stay in the same bed as their mothers; some have suffocated when their mothers rolled over in their sleep.

Patients who come here have no choice. It's the only hospital in the region they can afford. But for the doctors there is a way out: Study nursing and leave for the United States or Europe, where qualified nurses are in short supply.

Medical regulations in the U.S. and European countries typically make it very difficult for foreign doctors to work there as physicians. But nurses are in such demand that some recruiters offer bonuses of $15,000, the equivalent of three years' pay for a doctor in Dumaguete.

Of 207 doctors in Negros Oriental province, 79 have become nurses and more than 30 are in nursing school. This hospital is supposed to have 72 doctors, but only 43 remain. The Dumaguete district has closed two of its six rural hospitals and may soon have to close a third, said Dr. Ely Villapando, the province's chief health officer.

"We are worried sick about medical doctors taking up nursing and leaving," said Villapando, 63, who also runs the hospital. "We are losing the most skilled doctors. This is a crisis in healthcare."

An aid agency gave the hospital new cardiology equipment, but it sits unused. The hospital's only cardiologist left to become an emergency-room nurse in Chicago. What she earned in a month here, she can now make before lunch.

Here, patients are so poor that some pay in produce or livestock. X-rays cost a chicken. A bunch of bananas covers consultation. Delivering a baby costs one goat.

Villapando makes the equivalent of $437 a month. Two of his children have become nurses in the United States, one in Bakersfield and one in Texas. They send him money.

"My son already has a house of his own," he said. "He has two cars. My daughter is building a house and has two cars. They could not hope to achieve that here."

To become nurses, the doctors attend classes on weekends for a year and spend 2,200 hours as volunteer nurses at the hospital. Sometimes they do both jobs the same day.

"Some of the patients get confused," said Dr. Joyce Maningo, an internist studying to be a nurse. "They say, 'Weren't you a doctor this morning?' "

An ophthalmologist with her own practice, Dr. Eileen Marie Macia is near the top of her profession. Her father was a surgeon and a congressman. He was instrumental in building a new wing of the Dumaguete hospital. But she, too, is giving up. She is in nursing school and weighing whether it would be better to live in Tennessee or Los Angeles.

"If I go to the States, I will have to forget I am a doctor," she said as she made her nursing rounds. "I love the Philippines, but it will always be a Third World country."



Runaway maids arrive at the Philippine Embassy in Kuwait desperate, bruised, hungry and penniless. They slip out of their employers' homes in the dead of night through a window, over a wall or by walking out a door accidentally left unlocked.

They break the law simply by leaving without permission.

Some spend more than a year in the embassy compound, waiting for their passports, back pay or the resolution of their legal cases. If they step outside, they can be arrested.

At times, more than 500 women live at the offices of the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration next to the embassy. The building gets so crowded that the women cannot all lie down to sleep at the same time.

"It's like a prison," said Annabelle Abing, who lived there for three months.

More than 750,000 Philippine maids work in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries, where they often face legalized discrimination, beatings and sexual abuse.

The women frequently live in isolation, forbidden even to telephone their families. If they file a legal claim against their employer, they can be deported or imprisoned on trumped-up charges.

"They are treated like modern slaves," said Maita Santiago, secretary-general of Migrante International, a rights group for Philippine workers. "When workers are in distress, the government doesn't stand up for their rights for fear of the markets of foreign countries closing to Filipino workers."

Perhaps the toughest country for domestic workers is Saudi Arabia.

Sheila Marie Macatiag, 28, was earning $12 a month at a car stereo factory in the Philippines when she decided to take a job in Saudi Arabia to support her parents and six younger siblings.

Macatiag said she was forced to work from 5 a.m. to midnight, verbally abused for the smallest mistake and never given enough to eat. During her first six months, her employers paid her a total of $200; she had paid $300 to an employment agency in the Philippines to get the job.

Fed up, she ran away to the employment agency's local office. But by the time she got there, her employers had already complained that she had stolen money and watches from their vault. Police came and arrested her.

Despite the absence of evidence or witnesses, she spent 13 months in jail, Macatiag said.

"They told me they were going to cut off my hand or I would be sentenced to 108 years or I would die in prison," she said. "Even during trial they told me my hand would be cut off unless I admitted to the allegations."

She maintained that she was innocent, but a Saudi court convicted her and she received five lashes on the hand with a cane. She has returned to the Philippines but doesn't expect to find a job.

"There are so many people here and so few jobs," Macatiag said. She is hoping to leave the country again: "Anywhere but the Middle East," she said.

Even if there is no abuse, the emotional toll of being away from home can be heavy.

In Hong Kong, Philippine maids gather by the thousands in the city center every Sunday to spend their day off together. They fill the parks and sidewalks and overflow into the streets. Sitting on cardboard or sheets of plastic, they hold prayer meetings, play cards and have picnics.

Beneath the festivity is a sense of melancholy. These women spend the best years of their lives serving others.

Many leave their children behind so they can earn enough to pay for their schooling. Others forgo the chance to marry in order to provide for parents and siblings. Most make the equivalent of $420 a month and send more than half of it home.

Editha Ycon, 37, has worked 13 of the last 17 years in the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan and now Hong Kong. She has a degree in computer programming but could not find work in the Philippines. She has left her son twice to go overseas, first when he was 6 months old and again when he was 4 years old. He is now 10.

"I want to stay with my son," she said. "I want to prepare his breakfast before he goes to school. I want to pack his things. I am a mother, but not really. I haven't been a mother yet."



The people of Santa Rosa, a village two hours south of Manila, once made a living processing coconuts. But the men who worked in the drying sheds left the country long ago.

Now the village is known as Little Italy. It depends almost entirely on remittances from abroad. Of its 8,000 people, 3,000 work overseas, mainly in Italy and Spain. Left behind are children, the elderly and the disabled.

Overseas workers contributed money to build the two-story village office. A worker in Spain donated the village computer. Others helped buy an ambulance. But the village is distinguished by the more than 600 large Italian-style houses built with money sent home from overseas.

Village head Benito Alvarez, who wears a USA T-shirt given to him by cousins in America, said the owners were unlikely ever to live in them. "They build the house to prove to the people they grew up with that they are a big success," he said.

But what Alvarez sees as evidence of waste and opulence gives another villager a deep sense of satisfaction.

Carlito Villanueva, 67, began sending his children to Spain and Italy in 1985. Now all nine of them live in Europe, along with their spouses and his 14 grandchildren.

"If they had not gone, I could only see hardship for them, because life here is very difficult," he said. "I'm not sad at all. I'm very happy. As a parent, my major goal is to secure a good life for them."

Each of the children is sending money to build a house in the family compound. Four have been built, and a fifth is planned. All are unoccupied, except on the rare occasion when one of the children comes home for a visit.

"This is their home," he said. "Wherever they are in the world, even though they are scattered, they will come home to me."

Another neighbor, Digna Escueta, 28, hadn't been home since she left to work as a maid in Padua, Italy, six years earlier. She came back for two weeks to try to straighten out a domestic nightmare: Her husband was in prison for drug use, and her daughter was out of control.

Her parents worked overseas when she was growing up, starting with her mother when Escueta was 11. A brother and sister followed. Altogether, more than 50 relatives found work in Italy.

Escueta married as a teenager and soon had a baby. Her husband became addicted to methamphetamine.

"We grew up making our own decisions, and because of that we married young," she said. "Some children of overseas workers in this barrio fall into vice and lose direction in life."

When Escueta turned 22, she also went overseas, leaving her 1-year-old daughter, Yvonne, with a cousin.

Seeing her daughter for the first time in six years was not the reunion she was hoping for. Yvonne had become the terror of the neighborhood.

She slugged the boys when her mother's back was turned, making them cry. She killed kittens by hugging them to death, stepping on them or locking them in a closet, Escueta said. She killed a puppy by tying a string around its neck and letting it fall off a high bed.

"She loves them to death," her mother said.

Escueta acknowledged that the absence of so many parents meant troubles for the next generation of Filipinos.

"Going abroad has two sides," she said. "The bad side is the separation of the family. The children grow up without a mother's supervision. Sometimes they go astray. The good side is not just the income but the possibility the whole family could go overseas, which is my dream."



Angelo de la Cruz, a father of eight, was desperate. He needed to pay medical bills for a son who lost an eye in an accident and care for another who has Down syndrome.

He decided to leave his one-room bamboo hut two hours north of Manila and return to Saudi Arabia, where he'd worked three times. He left as a truck driver. He returned as a national symbol.

In July 2004, De la Cruz was ordered to deliver gasoline to U.S. troops in Iraq. He became separated from other trucks in the convoy and was abducted four hours after crossing the border.

His kidnappers demanded that the Philippines withdraw its contingent of 51 troops from the U.S.-led coalition. He expected to be beheaded. But with a narrow election victory behind her, President Arroyo could not risk offending the huge constituency of overseas workers and their families. She withdrew the Philippine troops a month ahead of schedule.

De la Cruz was freed after two weeks.

On his return home, he was showered with gifts: a new three-room house, a new motorcycle, a new job, a glass eye for his son and scholarships for his children.

"They kept saying I was a hero," he said. "I felt like I was just an ordinary person. Many say that I am a symbol of the Philippines. To this day, I keep wondering what it is I have become."

*

---

Paddock reported from the Philippines, Hong Kong, Japan, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, Singapore and Thailand.

*

About this series

Four articles examining the worldwide flow of remittances.

{ Saturday }

Kenya: Benta Wauna worked abroad to give her sister alternatives to arranged marriage and extreme poverty.

*

On the Web: To read previous articles, see an interactive photo gallery or participate in a discussion forum, go to latimes.com/ foreignaid.

*

(INFOBOX BELOW)

Statistical snapshot of the Philippines



Key facts, based on the most recent figures available.

Population estimate: 88 million

GDP, per person: $5,100

Percent living in poverty: 30%

Remittance income annually: $10.7 billion

*

Sources: CIA World Factbook, World Bank, Philippine Department of Labor, Times reporting. Compiled by John L. Jackson

A People Overwhelmed

GLIMPSES

Jose Ma. Montelibano

As government tries to close down a war front in Mindanao against the MILF, it decides to intensify hostilities with the NPA. The determination for armed confrontation continues, not just by government, but by the NPA as well. The need to control is paramount in any government, just as the need to take over appears central to any communist revolution. And two seemingly immovable intentions cannot but become violent.

What is ironic is that both sides mouth democracy. Government says it fights to retain freedom and democracy. The one even carries the name in its mother organization – the National Democratic Front. Democracy is truly misunderstood in the Philippines. Two forces contend and trigger death and destruction in the name of democracy, yet Filipinos were never asked in a nice and intelligent way if they are willing to be the victims.

There is no question that problems exist, and some are serious enough to cause serious trouble. Feudalism is a problem is the modern world. There are very rich people in a setting of massive poverty, and that is a problem. A Fil-Chinese professor working in a well-known university in the United States wrote that 1% control 60% of the Philippine economy, and that 1% is Chinoy. Now, that is a problem as well, and even a Chinese (Mao) inspired communist revolution will still insist on a classless society.

Muslims want Mindanao back but the greater majority of Mindanao residents are Christians. That's a problem. Lumads also want their lands back, maybe even their cultures. That's a problem as both Christians and Muslims may not agree. And the Americans are treating Mindanao as though it is too strategic for them to ever give it up, and that is a special problem.  

The list goes on. We have the majority of our people ignorant of the provisions of the present Constitution yet are credited of starting a People's Initiative to change it. That is a puzzlement, and will be a problem. We have politicians insisting on charter change but are shy about giving details of what they wish to propose. That is confusing, and a problem. And we have oil prices that keep going up as though there is no tomorrow, and what a host of other problems this triggers in our country.

We are a nation of problems, not the least of which is having a people so deeply divided and quick to quarrel over the most petty issue. And because we are so oriented towards problems, our laws are about problems, almost never visions. The few seemingly vision-driven bills appear so hypocritical coming from vision-less legislators. Everyone wants a piece of the action, but very few are willing to give as much, or even to give at all.

"What is in it for me?" is the standard thought and "What can I do for others?" is relegated only to sermons on Sundays. This is the root of all problems, when each one thinks his or her future is assured by looking out for oneself, by competing against everyone else. Somehow, there is a undeniable correlation between selfishness and competition, just as there is a strong correlation between fear on one hand and selfishness and competition on the other. Ultimately, the result produces what a great saying admonishes us against – that a house divided against itself cannot stand.

A people divided against itself. A nation divided, and doomed to fall. There is no more pitiful sight that a beautiful land being ravaged by greed, a beautiful people wasted by poverty, a beautiful culture vanishing against the onslaught of global materialism.

Craftsmen who thousands of years ago built boats to travel across great oceans are now queuing to apply with foreign shipping companies. Designers who crafted exquisite jewelry before the era of modern tools line up for jobs abroad and dominate the creative work of China whose finished products threaten to dominate the world. Artists with envied voices and graceful bodies beg to remain Japayukis and now finding themselves around American bases in South Korea.

Mothers and daughters who raised the level of hospitality to an art and a revered part of Filipino culture are now the housemaids and yayas of countries with more available jobs and more money to pay them than the local elite. Farmers who tilled their lands productively and even managed to sculpt beautiful and grandiose rice terraces more than two thousand years ago struggle to make a living and depend on a child or two slaving in the urban areas to make both ends meet.

And Filipinos from all walks of life look at television shows not to entertain themselves but to learn how life is in different countries so that they, too, will know how to live there. Rich and poor alike share a common dream, and it is not a beautiful tomorrow in the Philippines but in some foreign land.

A motherland bleeds, and a hemorrhage is prevented only because the visa sections of other nations do not allow a deluge of Filipino applicants to enter except through a long thin line and humiliating investigation of documents and personal interviews. A motherland bleeds as she loses her sons and daughters to adoption nations and weeps at the plight of those who stay behind.

Yet, this pain is nothing compared to the anguish of witnessing the leaders of what is left in a crumbling society fighting for control of a sinking ship. In the heat of their conflict, the paramount interest is how to survive in power, or to take over power. Nowhere is the vision, nowhere is the spirit, nowhere is the inspiration to recover all that is beautiful and once holy to us.

Nowhere except in the hearts of a few who seek neither power nor position, a few who resist the darkness and become light to others, a few whose love for the motherland transcends their fears for themselves and sends them to ease the pain of others. It is a moment for heroes, and only for heroes.

                                                              ***