Me: "D R Lindberg listed 'directly observed evolution, including speciation' as one of the general evidences for Darwinian theory. Setting aside the fact that...
... matter of empirical methods, but of logic. Circular reasoning is a form of faulty logic, whether the subject is scientific or non-scientific. ... logical...
Jim: I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. To say that intelligent design in nature has been detected and to say that intelligent design in nature has...
Charles P: Stewart, have you changed the subject? What about the "£650,823,060 Phase One" money prize? Is it going to end up like the Harry Lonsdale reward? ...
If you define evolution as change in any direction, you can easily prove evolution. In fact you can see it happening with your eyes, observe it as it is...
... Of course not. Neither Darwinism (whatever that is) nor the theory of evolution (nor, for that matter the sciences of geology, physics or astronomy and...
Stewart: Exactly like that reward Charles, in fact it was a direct result of your touting the Lonsdale reward despite being told it was a fake. (Like you'd...
Now, for those of you who watched the video lecture by Elizabeth Blackburn on Telemeres, a couple of questions come to mind about the logistics of a...
Me: "Where is the 'overwhelming AMOUNT of evidence from so many different SOURCES, so many different FIELDS of study' showing that the Darwinian mechanism of...
D R Lindberg: "...you are in effect calling ALL of science 'Circular reasoning.' Are you surprised that some people might consider that position a bit...
... No, no. Logic is independent of empirical methods. Now, if you had said "This is not good science if there is no empirical evidence for the conclusion."...
Gluadys: No, no. Logic is independent of empirical methods. Now, if you had said "This is not good science if there is no empirical evidence for the...
Stewart: Exactly like that reward Charles, in fact it was a direct result of your touting the Lonsdale reward despite being told it was a fake. (Like you'd...
gluadys: "Of course not. Neither Darwinism (whatever that is) nor the theory of evolution..." I dare say that most people use the term "Darwinism" just as...
... reasoning.' Are you surprised that some people might consider that position a bit extreme?" ... position. Based on what I said about the circularity in...
... You are quite right. That, of course, is necessary if one is going to pursue the question of whether the hypothesis is supported by empirical evidence....
Eugene: Now, for those of you who watched the video lecture by Elizabeth Blackburn on Telemeres, a couple of questions come to mind about the logistics of a...
... That may be so! It is entirely possible to define a cubit as the length between the longest finger and the elbow without using logic. However, MODERN...
gluadys: "If you don't find (the keys) in the car, you judge your hypothesis was false. If you do find them in the car, you conclude your hypothesis was valid....
Stewart: Charles, wake up and smell what you're shovelling. I don't have to delve into the internet to look for verification to know that it's fake, because...
Gluadys: The only issue now is whether such forms, demanded by logical conclusion, also show up as empirical artifacts. If they do, the logic of the theory is...
Me (providing a link to an essay by Wm. Dembski answering the question): "Is Darwinism theologically neutral?" Stewart: "What difference does it make whether...
... I don't think the distinction between inference (logic, thinking) and observation (empirical experience) is without a difference. Both play a very...
... speciation' as one of the general evidences for Darwinian theory. Setting aside the fact that the instances of 'directly observed evolution' (such as that...
... Why do you believe scientific statements are more valid than the Scriptures? Even worse, why do you tailor the Bible to fit science? Could the pope...
... You are pulling a bait and switch, Jim. The hypothesis was not about what the keys looked like, but about where they were. You did need the hypothesis...
gluadys: "If you don't find (the keys) in the car, you judge your hypothesis was false. If you do find them in the car, you conclude your hypothesis was valid....
