Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents · Taylor Emphysema Center - a dead possum

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 84
  • Category: Pollution
  • Founded: Aug 9, 2004
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 5733 - 5762 of 6161   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#5733 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sat Feb 5, 2011 3:16 am
Subject: Relationship between vegetables and fruits with the human body
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

http://thebest-healthy-foods.com/vegetables-and-fruits/

 

 

Relationship between vegetables and fruits with the human body

Vegetables and fruits that have been known that many common foods for the health benefits of the human body, but many of us do not realize that God has showed the benefits of real vegetables and fruits through the form of and vegetables and fruits themselves, so we can see some examples of fruits and vegetables as below

A sliced carrot as the human eye. As the human eyeball, and the incision line the exact same as the human eye. And the latest science to prove that the carrot works to increase blood flow and function of the eyes to be better

Tomato has four rooms in it and a red. Human heart has 4 rooms and is also red. All research shows that tomatoes contain a lot of work as lycopine Feed for blood.

A set of grape has a swing like a heart shape. Each grain of grape, such as blood cells and all the latest research indicates that the grape is also good for the heart and the food needed by the blood

Canary nuts such as small-sized brain. left  and right of its  Hemisphere, such as cerebrums top, and below it as cerebellums. Even wrinkling and folding in the page such as nuts,  and neo-cortex. At this time we know canary beans    help to give more than 3 dozen neurontransmitters for brain function

Red beans as a form of human kidney, red beans has a function to protect the eye and kidney function

Celery, and stem from the vegetables shaped like a bone. This special food for this is indeed the strength of bones. Bone consists of 23% sodium and this foods also consists of 23% sodium. If you are less sodium in your diet, the body will pick it up from the bone, this causes bones to become weak. This replaces the need for the required body foods for bone

Avocado, pear and fruit needed for the health of the mouth of the womb and the womb of women. Food that looks similar to the female organs. Latest research shows that if a woman eats 1 avocado a fruit sunday, will be to balance the hormones, and the mouth of the womb to prevent cancer. Avocado require 9 months to grow from a small ready to eat. There are over 14,000 chemical nutrients in each food

Fig is a fruit and nut filled depending on the number 2 when they grow  (the same as male organs). fruit Fig agility and increase  sperm mobility and also increase  the number of sperm  sterility  also to prevent the male

Olive fruit shaped like a human egg cell, and Olive nutritious fruit to increase the health and function of egg cells

Orange, lemon, and Citrus fruits are very similar with the female milk gland. And believe or not is a nutritious fruit for the health of milk and lymph gland

Such as the onion body cells. Latest research shows that onions help clear the unused material from the entire cell body. Onion can make the eyes can produce tears to wash the outside layer. Garlic, also helps eliminate material that is not useful and dangerous, such as free radicals from the body

Sweet potato, such as pancreas and have a property to balance  glycemic index for diabetics

So the only view of the vegetables nd fruits that we eat every day, we can infer what the benefits to our bodies that we can get if we consume the vegetable and fruit, and we can also see and understand that there is no creation of God that is not useful, and no human creation that can rival God’s creation as the natural owner of this highway

 


 
 
***************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5734 From: FINDJohnJ@...
Date: Sat Feb 5, 2011 7:04 pm
Subject: Everything Is Connected - John Jackson's Email
FINDJohnJ@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED!
 
Report #1:     Poetry                       
Report #2:     A New Christianity
Report #3:     Here’s To Your Health
Report #4:     Floridians, How Do You Like Your Government Now?
Report #5:     Laughter Is The Best Medicine
 
* * * * * * *
WIND ART
 
The wind upriver
Can barely be discerned
In the tops of the pines
But on the Gulf
The wind has kicked up
A light chop
And moves the drifting
Unanchored boat
At a steady wave lapping pace
 
But above our bouncing boat
Aloft in the firmament sky blue sky
The wind was chasing jet trails
And tumbling the Gulf clouds
Forming faces and creatures
That children used to point out
While making long automobile trips
With their parents
I wonder if they still do that
Sometimes the faces were friendly
Sometimes gruff
With various creatures suddenly appearing
To amaze young up-turned faces
And then reform
In some other guise
 
Above our boat
The mysterious unseen wind
Played in the altar of everywhere
Tickling the clouds
In their jubilant white
Until late in the day
These laughing clouds
Turned grim and dark
Laughter turned to tears
To wash the sky
To nourish the earth
With glad rain.
 
j.j.adam
Maitland, Fl. 2011
 
 
.* * * * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
A patriot must be ready to defend his country against his government.            -Edward Abbey
 
Dissent Protects Democracy
 
God Bless The Whole World – No Exceptions
* * * * * * * * *
A NEW CHRISTIANITY FOR A NEW WORLD
 
Peggy Goldsmith, via the Internet, writes:
 
You wrote in one of your columns recently “One reads the writings of some of the figures of history like Irenaeus, Polycarp, John Chrysostom and even Martin Luther for documentation of the deep anti-Semitism that has marked Christianity over the centuries.” In these writings, Jews were described as “vermin” and “unfit for life.”  How do you think those writers reconciled the fact that Jesus is a Jew?
 
Dear Peggy,
 
Prejudice is never rational.  I grew up in a southern Christian church, Holy Comforter Episcopal Church in Charlotte, North Carolina, where I was taught that segregation was the will of God, that women were by nature inferior to men, that homosexuals were either mentally sick or morally depraved and that Jews were all Christ killers.  Interestingly enough, the Bible was quoted to justify each of these prejudices.
 
Most of my anti-Semitism I actually learned in that church through my Sunday school material.  I never met a good Jew in Sunday school.  Jews were always pictured as dark, sinister figures who had names I was taught to dislike, such as Annas, Caiaphas, Sadducees, Pharisees, and Judas Iscariot.  Jews were only portrayed as the enemies of Jesus and of Paul and the ones who brought about the crucifixion of Jesus and the persecution of Paul.
 
No one in my Sunday school ever told me that Jesus was a Jew.  When I looked at pictures of him, he did not look like my image of what Jews were supposed to look like.  He had blond hair, blue eyes and fair skin.  I thought he might have been a Swede!
 
No one also ever told me that all of Jesus’ disciples were Jews, that Joseph and Mary were Jews, that Paul and Magdalene were Jews or that all of the authors of the various books in the bible were Jews either by birth or in the case of Luke alone, by conversion.
 
So it is easy for me to understand how it was that Christians through the centuries, out of a deep, rampant and uninformed hatred, simply repressed the Jewishness of Jesus in order to continue their persecution of the Jewish people.  It is also embarrassing and regrettable to realize that so much of our cultural anti-Semitism has been nothing less than the gift of the followers of Jesus to the world.
 
Once we raise history to consciousness, it is imperative that we act to dismantle it.  That is the only way I know to be faithful to the Jewish Jesus.
Bishop John Shelby Spong
* * * * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
If Logic Prevailed, Men Would Ride Sidesaddle.
 
Go Organic – Pesticides Don’t Know When To Stop Killing
 
Humans Aren’t The Only Species On Earth.  We Just Act Like It.
  
* * * * * * * * *
 
 LIVE LONGER BY TALKING ABOUT HEALTH AT FAMILY REUNIONS
 
By Joey Holleman
McClatchy/Tribune News
 
There’s a reason doctors always ask about your family’s health history.  Cancer, diabetes, heart disease and many other disorders have genetic factors.  Knowing if your family has a history for any of these conditions allows you and your physician to take preventive steps.
 
A survey cited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services noted that 96 percent of Americans believe knowing their family health history is important, but less than a third of Americans have gathered to discuss and write down those histories.
 
Reunions are a great place to start, because family elders have a depth of knowledge about medical problems.  Karen Brooks, a genetic counselor and assistant professor at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, suggests checking in with family members before a reunion to let them know you will be asking medical history questions.
 
Here are some other tips:
 
Start with the biggies – major birth defects, cancer, stroke and cardiovascular problems.  Discussion of disorders such as mental illness and learning disabilities might be a little touchier, but you should try to delve into those matters too.
 
Look at both sides of your family. If your reunion is almost exclusively members of your mother’s side of the family, try to do the same thing at the next get-together of the folks in your father’s family.  Most diseases can be inherited from either side.
 
Start with your immediate family and fan out.  Try to get at least three generations of information.  Then build from that nucleus, creating a medical family tree.
 
Share the information once it’s compiled.  If someone in your family isn’t interested, they can throw it away.  Too much information is better than too little.
 
Don’t stop after the initial information is compiled.  Family medical histories, like families, grow through the years.
 
The health community began pushing for better family histories about a decade ago.  Experts have begun suggesting an alternative to the family reunion: social networking communities such as Facebook.
 
Another online-related tool – My Family Health Portrait – can be found on the Health and Human Services site at www.familyhistory.hhs.gov. After you’ve gathered the family information, this tool guides you through the compilation of the family history and allows you to save it either to a secure Internet page or to your own computer hard drive.
 
The 3-2-1- Rule
 
One instance of a disease might not mean much. Health officials go by the 3-2-1- rule.  A medical condition is definitely worth bringing to the attention of your doctor if:
 
·      Three relatives on the same side of the family have had the same disorder, or
 
·      At least two of those who are closely related (sibling, parent, child) have had the same disorder, or
 
·      At least one was affected at a young age (before 50 for most cancers).
 
* * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
Renewable Energy is Homeland Security
 
There is No Mad Tofu Disease
 
Well Behaved Women Seldom Make History
* * * * * * * * * * *
THE SCOTT-O-METER
 
Governor Rick Scott enters office with big ambitions and dozens of campaign promises, starting with the first one – to remake State Government. (I thought that was the work of the Florida House, Senate, Supreme Court, and the Governor and his cabinet. J.J.)
 
PolitiFact Florida unveils its Scott-O-Meter today to keep track.  The Scott-O-Meter will analyze each promise – so far we’ve found 56 – and rate whether it was kept, broken or altered as part of a compromise.  Thos ratings will be tallied on our website, PolitiFact.com/Florida, creating an up-to-the-minute and evolving report card on Scott’s administration.  The concept is the same as PolitiFact’s Obameter, which is tracking President Barack Obama’s campaign promises.  But this meter is all about Scott, and state government.
 
IF Scott delivers on his word, Florida is in store for sweeping change – from how it runs its government, to how it teaches its students, to its relationship with the Obama administration.  And based on the new governor’s robust agenda, the Scott-O-Meter plans to be working overtime. 
 
Aaron Sharockman
St. Petersburg Times
 * * * * * * * * * *
 
FRIENDS – OUR WORK BEGINS
 
Continue to stand with People For The American Way in 2011 as we tackle the threats posed by the Tea Party/Republican dominated Congress. Here are just a few examples of the challenges they will pose in the coming year:
 
  • Repealing Health Care Reform.  This was the main plank of the Tea Party/GOP campaign platform and we can expect this goal to take center stage in the new Congress.
  • Rolling back civil rights protections.  During the campaign, many Tea Party/GOP candidates, including Rand Paul, the newly-elected senator from Kentucky, urged curtailments of our civil rights laws.
  • Continuing legalized discrimination against gays and lesbians.  These extremists will use every ounce of their homophobia and bigotry to prevent gays and lesbians from gaining marriage rights and other civil rights protections.
  • Undermining women’s reproductive rights.  We can expect many efforts to criminalize reproductive choices and other measure to suppress women’s rights.
  • Diminishing the role of the federal government.  They want to curtail federal influence over issues about the environment, energy, and education, including school prayer and creationism.  And they want federal judges who will help them do this work.
  • Attacking Social Security.  We can also expect the Tea Party/GOP contingent in Congress to make efforts to decrease benefits for older Americans.
 
Please do you part to oppose the Tea Party/GOP goals in 2011
 
People For The American Way
  
* * * * * * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
IF You Think Education Is Expensive, Try Ignorance
 
Invest in Weapons Of Mass INSTRUCTION
 
Enjoy Life.  This is Not a Dress Rehearsal.
 
 * * * * * * * * * * *
Odds and Ends 2011
 
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit:
Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
 
A House Trailer is a Wheel Estate
 
Birthdays are good for you;  The more you have, the longer you live.
 
This may surprise folks who do not live in Las Vegas, but there are more catholic churches than casinos.  Not surprising when the offertory basket is passed, some worshipers at Sunday services give casino chips rather than cash.  Since they get chips from many different casinos, the churches have devised a method to collect, sort and redeem the offerings.  The churches send all their collected chips to a nearby Franciscan monastery for sorting, which is done by a special group of chip monks.
 
Did you hear about the guy who thought he qualified for the funeral parlor job because he came from a long line of deceased people?
 
A Sunday school teacher decided to have her young class memorize one of the most quoted passages in the Bible – Psalm 23.  She gave the youngsters a month to learn the chapter.  Little Ricky was excited about the task – but he just couldn’t remember the Psalm.  After much practice, he could barely get past the first line.  On the day that the kids were scheduled to recite Psalm 23 in front of the congregation, Ricky was very nervous.  When it was his turn, Rick stepped up to the microphone and said proudly, “The Lord is my Shepherd, and that’s all I need to know.”
 
A Madison SC policeman had a perfect spot to watch for speeders, but wasn’t getting many.  Then he discovered the problem – a 12 year old boy was standing up the road with a hand painted sign, which read ‘RADAR TRAP AHEAD.’  The officer also found the boy had an accomplice who was down the road with a sign reading ‘TIPS’ and a bucket full of money.  (And we used to just sell lemonade!)
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * * *

#5735 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Wed Feb 9, 2011 4:38 am
Subject: Corporate Control? Not in These Communities
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 
From: Shireen Parsons <pachamama3@...>

Subject: Corporate Control? Not in These Communities


Yes! Magazine
February 7, 2011

Corporate Control? Not in These Communities

Can local laws have a real effect on the power of giant corporations?

by Allen D. Kanner

 

Mt. Shasta, a small northern California town of 3,500 residents nestled in the foothills of magnificent Mount Shasta, is taking on corporate power through an unusual process-democracy.

The citizens of Mt. Shasta have developed an extraordinary ordinance, set to be voted on in the next special or general election, that would prohibit corporations such as Nestle and Coca-Cola from extracting water from the local aquifer. But this is only the beginning. The ordinance would also ban energy giant PG&E, and any other corporation, from regional cloud seeding, a process that disrupts weather patterns through the use of toxic chemicals such as silver iodide. More generally, it would refuse to recognize corporate personhood, explicitly place the rights of community and local government above the economic interests of multinational corporations, and recognize the rights of nature to exist, flourish, and evolve. 

Mt. Shasta is not alone. Rather, it is part of a (so far) quiet municipal movement making its way across the United States in which communities are directly defying corporate rule and affirming the sovereignty of local government.

Since 1998, more than 125 municipalities have passed ordinances that explicitly put their citizens' rights ahead of corporate interests, despite the existence of state and federal laws to the contrary. These communities have banned corporations from dumping toxic sludge, building factory farms, mining, and extracting water for bottling. Many have explicitly refused to recognize corporate personhood. Over a dozen townships in Pennsylvania, Maine, and New Hampshire have recognized the right of nature to exist and flourish (as Ecuador just did in its new national constitution). Four municipalities, including Halifax in Virginia, and Mahoney, Shrewsbury, and Packer in Pennsylvania, have passed laws imposing penalties on corporations for chemical trespass, the involuntary introduction of toxic chemicals into the human body.

These communities are beginning to band together. When the attorney general of Pennsylvania threatened to sue Packer Township this year for banning sewage sludge within its boundaries, six other Pennsylvania towns adopted similar ordinances and twenty-three others passed resolutions in support of their neighboring community. Many people were outraged when the attorney general proclaimed, "there is no inalienable right to local self-government."

Bigger cities are joining the fray. In November, Pittsburg's city council voted to ban corporations in the city from drilling for natural gas as a result of local concern about an environmentally devastating practice known as "fracking." As city councilman Doug Shields stated in a press release, "Many people think that this is only about gas drilling. It's not-it's about our authority as a municipal community to say 'no' to corporations that will cause damage to our community. It's about our right to community, [to] local self-government."

What has driven these communities to such radical action? The typical story involves a handful of local citizens deciding to oppose a corporate practice, such as toxic sludge dumping, which has taken a huge toll on the health, economy, and natural surroundings of their town. After years of fighting for regulatory change, these citizens discover a bitter truth: the U.S. environmental regulatory system consists of a set of interlocking state and federal laws designed by industry to serve corporate interests. With the deck utterly stacked against them, communities are powerless to prevent corporations from destroying the local environment for the sake of profit.

Enter the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, a nonprofit public interest law firm that champions a different approach. The firm helps communities draft local ordinances that place the rights of municipalities to govern themselves above corporate rights. Through its Democracy School, which offers seminars across the United States, it provides a detailed analysis of the history of corporate law and environmental regulation that shows a need for a complete overhaul of the system. Armed with this knowledge and with their well-crafted ordinances, citizens are able to return to their communities to begin organizing for the passage of laws such as Mt. Shasta's proposed ordinance.

The Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund is collaborating with Global Exchange, an international environmental and workers' rights organization, to help supporters of the Mt. Shasta ordinance organize. In an interview for this article, I asked Shannon Biggs, who directs Global Exchange's Community Rights Program, if she expected ordinances of this type to be upheld in court. Biggs was dubious about judges "seeing the error of their ways" and reversing a centuries-old trend in which courts grant corporations increased power. Rather, she sees these ordinances as powerful educational and organizing tools that can lead to the major changes necessary to reduce corporate power, put decision-making back in the hands of real people rather than corporate "persons," and open up whole new areas of rights, such as those of ecosystems and natural communities. Biggs connects the current municipal defiance of existing state and federal law to a long tradition of civil disobedience in the United States, harkening back to Susan B. Anthony illegally casting her ballot, the Underground Railroad flouting slave laws, and civil rights protesters purposely breaking segregation laws.

But the nascent municipal rights movement offers something new in the way of political action. These communities are adopting laws that, taken together, are forming an alternative structure to the global corporate economy. The principles behind these laws can be applied broadly to any area where corporate rights override local self-government or the well-being of the local ecology. The best place to start, I would suggest, is with banning corporations from making campaign contributions to local elections.

The municipal movement could provide one of the most effective routes to building nationwide support for an Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In fact, the movement is already expanding. In Pennsylvania, people are now organizing on the state level and similar stirrings have been reported in New Hampshire.

What about your community?

 

 This article originally appeared in Tikkun.


            ^. .^
>^..^<    \/    >^..^< 

Shireen Parsons
Summit Hill, Pennsylvania

"If people insist on living as if there's no tomorrow,
there really won't be one."   - Kurt Vonnegut





--
           ^. .^
>^..^<    \/    >^..^< 

Shireen Parsons
Summit Hill, Pennsylvania

"If people insist on living as if there's no tomorrow,
there really won't be one."   - Kurt Vonnegut


--

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/a/heartwood.org/group/issues?hl=en
 

#5736 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:05 pm
Subject: Fw: Winter Newsletter: Florida PIRG Helps Win New Food Safety Law
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

From: "Brad Ashwell, Florida PIRG Legislative Advocate" <action@...>


Subject: Winter Newsletter: Florida PIRG Helps Win New Food Safety Law

Florida PIRG

Winter 2011 Newsletter

Florida Public Interest Research Group
Citizen Advocate, Vol. 27 No. 1

From The Director
friend

As I talk to Florida PIRG staff and supporters, I hear a group of people who are fired up.

“How can this be?” you might ask. Isn’t the country in a sour mood these days? Didn’t we just see special interest money wash over and foul our politics this past fall? Didn’t Americans just turn out many of the elected officials who support health care reform, Wall Street reform, high-speed rail and other items on our agenda?

Yes, yes and yes.

Yet as Justice Louis Brandeis once put it, “the highest office in a democracy is that of citizen.” And we are fortunate to be staffed and supported by a group of citizens who are ready to roll up their sleeves and do what it takes to help our country meet a wide range of challenges to our health, our safety, our democracy and our well being, as you can see in this newsletter.

Thanks for being part of it.

Sincerely,

Brad Ashwell
Florida PIRG Legislative Advocate


Top Stories

Food Recalls

RECALLS PROLIFERATE—Last year, there were 56 recalls affecting food products in Florida. The voluntary recall of half a billion eggs took nearly three months. New food safety rules will allow the FDA to order recalls and protect public health.

Florida PIRG Helps Win New Food Safety Law

The Food Safety Modernization Act, backed by Florida PIRG and signed by President Barack Obama on Jan. 4, increases the power the Food and Drug Administration has to test food for dangerous pathogens, protect Americans from food produced overseas, or recall contaminated food from the marketplace.

Florida PIRG’s Elizabeth Hitchcock and other staff met with key senators to implore them to act and improve the bill. Read more . . .

Back to top


Closing The Floodgates On Corporate Spending

When the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to allow corporations and other special interests to spend more freely to influence the outcome of elections, Florida PIRG predicted the decision would open our democracy to “a raging flashflood of corporate money.”

Unfortunately, we were right: Outside groups spent more than $450 million on 2010 federal races—$11 million in Florida—dwarfing all previous midterm elections. Of that, $137 million came from undisclosed donors and almost $80 million went into attack ads.

While a challenge, the new Congress can and should take action to mitigate the impact of the court’s wrong-headed decision.

Back to top


Common Ground on Our Fiscal Future

Florida PIRG worked with the National Taxpayers Union to produce a joint report—“Toward Common Ground”—that identified spending cuts that would save $600 billion by 2015. We were able to agree on 31 reforms.

Among them, we recommended cutting wasteful subsidies, which would save $62 billion. This includes ending a program that gives taxpayer dollars to some of the most profitable and recognizable multi-national corporations—including McDonald’s, Nabisco and Fruit of the Loom—to run TV ads overseas. You can read the full report on our federation website.

Back to top


Wall Street Reform Under Attack

According to the Los Angeles Times, regulators have had more than 500 meetings with industry lobbyists who want to weaken, delay or otherwise obstruct reforms.

Among the lobbyists’ targets is the so-called “Volcker Rule.” The rule is designed to restrict proprietary trading, a practice that allows banks to put your deposits at risk while investing for their own profit—the kind of risky financial behavior that could trigger another economic crisis.

Last fall, Florida PIRG and our allies helped mobilize more than 5,000 people to send comments to federal officials, calling on them to keep the Volcker Rule strong.

Back to top

News Briefs

toy safety

BUYER BEWARE—Jennifer came to us this fall after her 1-year-old son, Jack, nearly choked on a wooden peg from a toy train. She said, “My doctor told me that if I had not seen my son choking I would never have heard him...She told me he could have died.”

To Keep Kids Safe, Try The Tube Test

As American parents shopped for gifts for their infants and toddlers last holiday season, Florida PIRG researchers warned not to trust federal safety standards to keep kids safe from choking hazards.

Florida PIRG advises parents to use a toilet tissue tube to test whether a part poses a choking hazard. If a piece from the toy fits through the tube, it’s too small for a young child to play with. The recommendation was announced as part of the release of our 25th annual “Trouble in Toyland” survey of hazardous toys.

Back to top


Insurance Exchanges: The Devil In The Details

Under the new health reform law, by January 2014 small business owners and people without insurance should be able to pool their buying power and shop for the best deal through a new state health insurance exchange.

However, a set of decisions made by state officials will determine how well the exchange promotes competition and holds prices in check. It’s clear which model the insurance companies would prefer, and that’s why Florida PIRG is working on your behalf to make sure we get a strong program that expands care and lowers costs.

Back to top


A Track Record Of Success

Over the last two years, the federal government has distributed $10.4 billion in grants to construct or plan high-speed rail including incremental measures that increase the speed and reliability of existing passenger rail.

In a report entitled In a report entitled “A Track Record of Success,” our researchers profiled examples of passenger high-speed rail systems that boosted local economies while reducing traffic on roads and replacing inefficient air travel.

Back to top



Support Florida PIRG. Contributions by people just like you make our advocacy possible. Your contribution supports a staff of organizers, attorneys, scientists and other professionals who monitor government and corporate decisions and advocate on the public’s behalf.

This message was sent to hopeforcleanwater@.... If you want us to stop sending you e-mail then follow this link -- Unsubscribe -- to a web page where you can remove yourself.

#5737 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:07 pm
Subject: You're spending $300 an hour to overturn your own vote -- OrlandoSentinel.com
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 

From: lloydb4 <lloydb4@...>
Subject: You're spending $300 an hour to overturn your own vote -- OrlandoSentinel.com

You're spending $300 an hour to overturn your own vote -- OrlandoSentinel.com

orlandosentinel.com/news/columnists/os-scott-maxwell-your-money-vote-021120110210,0,4098738.column OrlandoSentinel.com

You're spending $300 an hour to overturn your own vote Scott Maxwell TAKING NAMES 9:25 PM EST, February 10, 2011

 By now, you probably know that some of your elected officials are fighting to overturn your vote for Fair Districts. But did you know they're spending your money to do so? Yes indeed — to the tune of $300-an-hour legal bills. How much total? Well, that's what I wanted to know. Getting answers, however, wasn't easy. I started with the office of House Speaker Dean Cannon — the guy leading the legislative fight to overturn your vote.

 Cannon and the state House joined the lawsuit that had already been filed by U.S. Reps Corrine Brown, D-Orlando, and Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Miami. All of these political plaintiffs argue that Floridians had no right to call for compact, sensibly drawn congressional districts that aren't based upon party affiliation.

 Such a thing, after all, might wreck the current system where politicians get to draw snake-like districts, tailor-made for themselves and their friends. It didn't matter to them that an overwhelming majority of Floridians — 63 percent — passed the constitutional amendment. The politicians think you got it wrong and their authority has been trumped.

 So they're asking the courts to throw out your vote on Amendment 6, the one that deals with congressional districts. (No one has yet challenged Amendment 5, the other one that deals with state legislative districts.)

 Legal battles cost money. So I asked Cannon's office: How much? The response: They were unsure. Um … pardon? I must've misunderstood. Because it sounded like you said you weren't sure how much of my money you're spending to overturn my vote. That can't be right, can it? Turns out, it was.

 Cannon spokeswoman Katie Betta said the House hired a gaggle of attorneys to handle all of the redistricting issues — including basic ones that have nothing to do with legal challenges. Said Betta: "We do not have a breakdown of fees for the Amendment 6 case." How convenient.

It also struck me as unusual. Cannon used to work for GrayRobinson. I simply can't imagine big-league lawyers being unable to figure out how much money they were spending on which parts of their legal affairs. Hmm, maybe these guys are right: Government does lack accountability! (When they're the ones running it, anyway.)

OK, I figured, if you can't give me the specific legal bills I want, I guess I should ask for them all.

 Betta dutifully responded with 47 pages of invoices. (On a personal note, I should say that Betta was very helpful and forthcoming throughout the process. If I asked for a public document, she delivered in timely fashion.) The invoices showed that a lot of the money — more than $90,000 worth — went to the South Florida firm of lawyer, Miguel De Grandy, who charged taxpayers $300 an hour. Another firm, Latham & Watkins, collected another $30,000 or so. But the largest chunk of taxpayer dollars — more than $600,000 — went to Cannon's old firm, GrayRobinson.

I don't find the choice of law firms particularly suspect. GrayRobinson was hired before Cannon started as speaker. And Betta said that the Legislature had used lawyers at GrayRobinson for redistricting matters in decades past. But you can bet your invoice that I still have questions and concerns about the billing in general. I'm betting most of you do, too.

We now know taxpayers have shelled out more than $700,000 for legal work on redistricting. But we don't know specifically how much of that was spent trying to overturn the public's vote, how much was spent trying to fight Fair Districts before the election and how much will be spent in the future.

 That's unacceptable.

 Taxpayers deserve detailed information about how every one of their dollars is spent. And any amount of public money spent trying to thwart the public's will is too much.

Scott Maxwell can be reached at smaxwell@... or 407-420-6141. Copyright © 2011, Orlando Sentinel


- Sent using Google Toolbar

#5738 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:09 pm
Subject: Fw: Links to articles in today's press about environmental health
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: AboveTheFold <AboveTheFold@...>
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 9:17:10 AM
Subject: Links to articles in today's press about environmental health

Environmental Health News

Above the fold. News aggregated by www.EnvironmentalHealthNews.org


Don't miss the link to
today's good news

Read today's editorials

Daily links to top stories in the news about environmental health.

Forest Service eyes rules to increase control. Hoping to break a legal logjam that has stymied logging as well as ecosystem restoration, the U.S. Forest Service said Thursday it was revising its planning rules to take more control over national forests and find more common ground between industry and conservation groups. Associated Press
http://yhoo.it/dTRa3C

Ex-C.I.A. agent goes public with story of mistreatment on the job. In many ways, the personal injury lawsuit looked routine: In late 2001, a government employee and his family sued the agency he worked for, saying it had placed them in a mold-contaminated home that made them sick and required nearly all their possessions to be destroyed. New York Times [Registration Required]
http://nyti.ms/ee2Wnk

Experts skeptical of new report on infant deaths at Fort Bragg. The Consumer Product Safety Commission and the U.S. Army released a long-awaited report Thursday about a rash of unexplained infant deaths at Fort Bragg, N.C., concluding that no environmental issue—including contaminated drywall—was to blame for the babies’ deaths. ProPublica
http://bit.ly/edUQ4h

Goodwin grants order blocking MIC unit start-up. A federal judge on Thursday ordered Bayer CropScience not to resume production of the deadly pesticide ingredient methyl isocyanate at its chemical plant in Institute. Charleston Gazette, West Virginia.
http://bit.ly/eW4aeT

Allentown blast kills five; neighborhood in ruins. As Thursday dawned, the extent of the explosion and fire in central Allentown became starkly visible: half a block reduced to cinders by a catastrophe that killed five people, displaced scores from their homes and raised fears about the soundness of the aged gas pipelines beneath the city. Allentown Morning Call, Pennsylvania.
http://bit.ly/f3UIkh

Allentown pipeline explosion revives natural gas worries. A fiery natural gas explosion in Allentown, Pa., is the latest in a series of deadly accidents that have raised worries about a form of energy that had a good safety record until recently. USA Today
http://usat.ly/h9Jkcu

PG&E blast: Why pressure was spiked on gas lines. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. officials said Thursday that the utility has repeatedly boosted the pressure on several urban natural gas lines that have what the federal government has classified as substandard welds. San Francisco Chronicle, California.
http://bit.ly/gELJgk

EPA closes in on Libby toxicity value. An important step in the development of a risk assessment for Libby’s unique form of asbestos is almost complete, Environmental Protection Agency officials told the Libby City Council at a presentation Tuesday. Libby Western News, Montana.
http://bit.ly/eUXK7A

US science agencies targeted for cuts. The US budget battle of 2011 has barely begun, but the opening salvos are echoing loudly across the capitol - with energy research and environmental regulation among areas hardest hit in the proposed budget plan. Nature
http://bit.ly/fB6IRH

Extreme weather batters the insurance industry. It's a tough time to be in the U.S. property insurance business. Storms are happening in places they never happened before, at intensities they have never reached before and at times of year when they didn't used to happen. The last couple of months underscore just how much climate seems to be changing. Reuters
http://bit.ly/hqxTGL

Koch brothers to be big winners if Obama OKs oil sands pipeline. Obama’s bitterest political enemies already import and refine 25 percent of oil sands crude reaching the U.S., and stand to profit from an increased flow. Solve Climate News
http://bit.ly/dN8EPn

Experts question report on health of Gulf of Mexico after oil spill. A new report on the Gulf of Mexico after the oil spill suggests a bright future. By next year, it says, harvests of shrimp, crab, oysters and finfish should be almost back to normal. Not so fast, say some members of the scientific community. St. Petersburg Times, Florida.
http://bit.ly/i2xdeR

Obama administration might oppose independent offshore oil safety agency, according to draft memo. The Obama administration largely embraces the legislative priorities recommended by the Oil Spill Commission but could disagree with the group on a key regulatory proposal, according to a White House draft memo. New Orleans Times-Picayune, Louisiana.
http://bit.ly/eyUQjP

Contamination from GM alfalfa certain: Experts. Contamination of organic and traditional crops by recently deregulated, genetically modified alfalfa is inevitable, agriculture experts said, despite Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's recent assurances the federal government would take steps to prevent such a problem. Associated Press
http://bit.ly/h8WsJs

X-rays and CT scans on babies pose cancer risk, study shows. Carrying out X-rays on pregnant women and babies could increase the risk of childhood cancers, research suggests, backing up what has long been suspected by clinicians. Edinburgh Scotsman, United Kingdom.
http://bit.ly/fCCF78

Supermarket chicken harbours superbugs. Chicken bought at major supermarkets across Canada is frequently contaminated with superbugs - bacteria that many antibiotics cannot kill. All of the bacteria uncovered during the Marketplace sampling of chicken were resistant to at least one type of antibiotic. Some of the bacteria were resistant to six, seven or eight types. CBC Canada
http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2011/02/10/cons-supermarket-superbugs.html

Tyson pays $5.2 million to settle bribery claims. When top executives of Tyson Foods discovered that the company’s Mexican chicken plants were paying bribes to government inspectors, they not only allowed the practice to continue, they found an acceptable way to make the illicit payments, according to federal court documents released on Thursday. New York Times [Registration Required]
http://nyti.ms/eLipp7

New federal food safety law gives whistleblowers protection from retaliation by employers. Food industry workers who become whistleblowers gained protection against retaliation from their employers with a little-noticed provision in the sweeping food safety law President Barack Obama signed last month. Associated Press
http://bit.ly/e4mlFi

Tobacco-free hiring in workplaces. More hospitals and medical businesses in many states are adopting strict policies that make smoking a reason to turn away job applicants, saying they want to increase worker productivity, reduce health care costs and encourage healthier living. New York Times [Registration Required]
http://nyti.ms/gORYJC

More news from today
>150 more stories today, including:
No-so-white coats
Climate: Wind wins during blackouts; Biomass bummer; Texas-sized wind farm; Carbon capture pipedream?
Trash or treasure?
Coca-Cola's green plan fizzles
Stories from UK, Poland, Russia, S Africa, Sudan, China, India, Australia, Chile, Canada
EPA bashing
US stories from PA, DE, MI, OH, IL, TN, MO, LA, ND, TX, CO, WA, CA
Smoking: Clearing the air in Minnesota
Editorials: Stop the polluters; Regulation of fracking insufficient; Protecting the whistle-blowers

Shortcuts to stories from today about The good news, Avian flu, Katrina, Climate, Children's health, Air pollution, Cancer, Reproductive disorders, Endocrine disruption, Birth defects, Learning and developmental disabilities, Immune disorders, Environmental justice, Superfund, Water treatment/sewage, Food safety, Integrity of science, Green chemistry.

You can also read last weekend's news.

Plus: If you were on vacation last week, don't miss last week's top stories...

Would you like to display the news stories from EnvironmentalHealthNews.org on your own web site? Check out our RSS feeds.

Compiled by Environmental Health Sciences
421 Park Street, Suite 4 Charlottesville, VA USA 22902
www.EnvironmentalHealthNews.org
feedback@...

Having problems viewing this e-mail? View the newsletter online.

To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add AboveTheFold@... to your address book.

If you received this email from a friend and would like to start receiving our newsletter yourself you may subscribe here.


#5739 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Fri Feb 11, 2011 11:15 pm
Subject: Fw: Progress Florida Daily Clips 2-11-11
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 


From: "Jon Bleyer, Progress Florida" <info@...>
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 8:36:17 AM
Subject: Progress Florida Daily Clips 2-11-11

Progress Florida Daily Clips

Support Daily Clips. Make A Contribution.


FEATURED STORIES

Gov. Rick Scott's budget slashes spending for homeless, other vulnerable groups
By Janet Zink
St. Petersburg Times/Miami Herald Tallahassee Bureau
Last year, agencies that help Florida's homeless received nearly $7 million in state funding to assist more than 74,000 people.

Battle brewing over Florida's 2012 presidential primary date
By Mary Ellen Klas
Miami Herald
Battle lines are forming over whether or not Florida should continue to hold its presidential primary election weeks before other states, a plan opposed by national party leaders.

Merit pay bill passes key Senate panel
By Leslie Postal
Orlando Sentinel
A teacher merit-pay bill won its first favorable vote in the Senate education committee today, with its sponsor saying, "We're not here to punish teachers."

Experts question report on health of Gulf of Mexico after oil spill
By Emily Nipps
St. Petersburg Times
A new report on the Gulf of Mexico after the oil spill suggests a bright future.

BEST OF THE BLOGS

Menace to Society: 7 Reasons Rick Scott is bad for Florida
By Joy-Ann Reid
The Reid Report
When Rick Scott was running for Florida governor, he tagged his “let’s get to work” jobs plan “777.”

Florida’s Unemployed Are Lazy Druggies, Say Republican and Business Leaders
By Bruce Seaman
Daily Marion
All those unemployed citizens of Florida are the problem with the costs of unemployment insurance.

Unconventional Wisdom: Candidate Development – The First Steps
By Mario Piscatella
MPA Political
OK, you a considering a run for public office, now what do you do?

Stupid, Broke, and Sick
By Mustang Bobby
Bark Bark Woof Woof
Gov. Rick Scott's budget proposals for Florida are so drastic that not even the Republicans in the state legislature are happy with them.

Environmental protection: hung out to dry by politics, again
By gimleteye
Eye on Miami
Protections for the environment-- for our clean air and clean water and natural resources-- are under concerted attack by the Republican right.

POLITICAL RACES

When should Florida hold its presidential primary?
By Keith Laing
News Service of Florida
A showdown is looming over the timing of Florida's 2012 presidential primary, with the leaders of both major political parties in favor of moving the vote from January and several top politicians opposing a delay.

Republican presidential primary contenders to visit Florida legislature
By Travis Pillow
Florida Independent
At the end of a media availability today, Senate President Mike Haridopolos said potential Republican presidential contenders will be visiting lawmakers in Tallahassee during the upcoming legislative session.

ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY

Environmental advocates fret over Scott's tax cuts to water districts
By Brandon Larrabee
Florida Times-Union
A potential 25 percent cut in the property taxes collected by the state's water management districts has environmental advocates worried that the agencies' abilities to preserve the quality of waters like those that flow through the St. Johns River could be compromised.

Environmental groups ask government to set up new Florida panther colony in Okefenokee Swamp
By Craig Pittman
St. Petersburg Times
Federal officials have talked for 30 years about finding a new place for Florida panthers to roam without ever taking action. Meanwhile, development has nibbled away at the available habitat in South Florida.

The great Gulf offshore drilling jobs hoax continues
By Chris Kromm
Facing South
Politicians in the Gulf Coast are still attacking President Obama's slow-down on offshore drilling, even as more evidence comes in that the post-BP spill measure has had modest effect on the coast's oil economy.

EDUCATION

Scott pitches expansion of public school choice
By Leslie Postal and Rafael A. Olmeda
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Gov. Rick Scott is pushing to expand public school choice by allowing students more ways to transfer to other campuses, enroll in charter schools and take classes online.

Gov. Rick Scott's K-12 budget called 'smoke and mirrors'
By Michael C. Bender
St. Petersburg Times
For a Republican-controlled Legislature that voted to increase taxes and fees by $2 billion two years ago, the bipartisan boos over Gov. Rick Scott's proposed spending cuts might not be too surprising.

Florida Board of Governors committee rejects some proposed university fees
By Jodie Tillman
St. Petersburg Times
The Board of Governors' budget committee Thursday took up new student fees, its first-ever review since the Legislature last year handed over that authority.

JOBS, BUDGET, AND ECONOMY

Florida unemployment proposals would cut benefits
By Michael C. Bender
St. Petersburg Times/Miami Herald Tallahassee Bureau
Unemployed Floridians would work harder to earn fewer state benefits under a pair of proposals on the fast track in the Florida Legislature.

Haridopolos: Public employees must take benefit cut
By Nathan Crabbe
Gainesville Sun
Florida Senate President Mike Haridopolos told a University of Florida audience Thursday that state workers must face benefit cuts to help balance the budget.

Bing Energy to move headquarters to Florida, lured by prospect of tax cuts
By Michael C. Bender
St. Petersburg Times
Bing Energy of Chino, Calif., announced Thursday it would move its headquarters and production facility to Florida.

Bring on the pain, governor says
Editorial
St. Petersburg Times
President Barack Obama has a reasonable plan to help states like Florida that have borrowed billions from Washington to cover jobless benefits during this period of record unemployment.

HEALTH AND SENIORS

It’s all about Medicaid next week
By Jim Saunders
Health News Florida
Florida Senate leaders next week will release their first detailed proposal for overhauling the Medicaid system, calling for a shift of hundreds of thousands of beneficiaries to managed-care plans.

'Optional' Medicaid services may be cut
Associated Press
Sarasota Herald-Tribune
Dentistry, eyeglasses and mental health services for Medicaid patients may be cut as part of the state's effort to curb the $21 billion budget next year for health care for the poor and disabled.

Scott slammed on database repeal
By Carol Gentry
Health News Florida
Cops, grieving parents and editorial boards say they're appalled at Gov. Rick Scott's idea of repealing the planned prescription drug monitoring system, aimed at catching drug-dealers who go "doctor-shopping" for narcotics.

WellCare settles with big investors
By Jim Saunders
Health News Florida
WellCare Health Plans is continuing to clean up the mess of a Medicaid fraud scandal, reaching a legal settlement with investors that could have a price-tag as high as $200 million.

Scripps Florida breakthrough blocks Parkinson's
By Jeff Ostrowski
Palm Beach Post
Scientists at Scripps Florida have discovered a way to stop the progress of Parkinson's disease, the brain disorder that afflicts about 1 million Americans and has defied the search for a cure.

JUSTICE AND THE COURTS

Gov. Rick Scott's prison overhaul plan hits resistance in Senate
By Steve Bousquet
St. Petersburg Times/Miami Herald Tallahassee Bureau
Gov. Rick Scott's plan to overhaul Florida's prison system, in part by firing hundreds of correctional officers, hit a wall of resistance Thursday.

Click here to unsubscribe.


#5740 From: FINDJohnJ@...
Date: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:00 pm
Subject: Everything Is Connected - John Jackson's Email
FINDJohnJ@...
Send Email Send Email
 
EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED!
 
Report #1:     Poetry                       
Report #2:     Congregational Life
Report #3:     Every Day Is Earth Day
Report #3:     Here’s To Your Health
Report #4:     Floridians, How Do You Like Your Government Now?
Report #5:     Laughter Is The Best Medicine
 
* * * * * * *

SEASONS

 

The world of Nature

Has Seasons.
Why can’t we?
 
Why can’t we have
Fallow times
Awakening days
Growth periods
Harvest seasons
 

The world of Nature

Has Seasons.
Why can’t we?
 
Times when the sap
Is not always rising
Non hectic sabbaticals
And
Times to plant new seeds
Begin new things
Discover new gifts
Within ourselves.
 

The world of Nature

Has Seasons.
Why can’t we?
 
Times to water
Times to weed
Times to let go and let grow
Times to rejoice
Times of transition
Times to savor completions
 
j.j.adam
Jacksonville
Earth Kinship 2000
.* * * * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
Got Food?  Thank A Migrant Worker
 
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.                        -Orwell
 
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time and your government when it deserves it.
                                                                                                            -Mark Twain
 
* * * * * * * * *
DIACONATE
 
First Congregational Church Of Winter Park, United Church Of Christ
Becomes An “Open And Affirming’ (ONA) Congregation
 
After a process spanning two and a half years, First congregational Church of Winter Park (UCC), voted to adopt the “Open and Affirming” statement presented by the Diaconate board to a Congregational Meeting on November 21, 2010.  The two and a half year process, guided by the Diaconate, included initial conversations to explore if the congregation wanted to have an ONA discussion, survey work, determination of strong interest to engage in a church-wide conversation, special speakers, panels, guest clergy, films, town hall meetings, round-table discussions, the decision at an Annual Congregational Meeting to form a statement drafting committee, the review and adoption of the draft statement by the Diaconate making it the Proposed Statement, the review and adoption of the Proposed Statement by the church Council, and finally the presentation of the document and a discussion at the Congregational Meeting.  The “Open and Affirming Statement” was adopted by a 95% majority vote with 129 members in attendance.  First Congregational Church will be registered as an ONA congregation with the Florida Conference of the United Church of Christ, and the National Setting of the UCC.  Our Church will appear on the national church website as an ONA Congregation, along with our status as a “Still Speaking Church.”  Our Statement as adopted reads:
 
We are a community of Extravagant Welcome.  We welcome and embrace with affirmation, persons of every age, race, culture, religious background, political affiliation, economic and social status, physical and mental ability, gender, marital status, and family structure.  Therefore, in this spirit, we of First congregational Church of Winter Park, United Church of Christ, declare ourselves an Open and Affirming  congregation.  We welcome and embrace with affirmation, persons of every sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression into the full life, membership, leadership, employment, and ministry of this Church.
 
* * * * * * * * *
ANDERSON SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY FOR LAYPERSONS
ANDERSON, S.C.
50TH ANNIVERSARY LECTURES
FEB 18 & 19, 2011
 
To Register Go To Astlonline.Org
 
No Charge To Register Or Attend.  Donations Greatly Appreciated
 
“PARABLES BY AND ABOUT JESUS”
 
Dominic Crossan: born in Nenagh, Co. Tipperary, Ireland, in 1934.  Doctorate of Divinity from Maynooth  College, Ireland, in 1959.  Post doctoral research at the Pontifical Biblical Institute in Rome from 1959 to 1961 and at the Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem from 1965 to 1967.  Member of a thirteenth-century Roman Catholic religious order, the Services (Ordo Servorum Mariae).  Ordained priest from 1957 to 1969.  Joined DePaul University, Chicago, in 1969.  Professor Emeritus in its Department of Religious studies.  Renowned biblical and Jesus scholar.  Has written twenty-five books on the historical Jesus, earliest Christianity, and the historical Paul.  Vice President of the society of Biblical Literature for 2010-2011 and President for 2011-2012.
 
Marcus J. Borg: Canon Theologian at Trinity Episcopal Cathedral in Portland, Oregon.  Internationally known biblical and Jesus scholar.  He was Hundere Chari of Religion and Culture in the Philosophy Department at Oregon State University.  Retired 2007.  Author of nineteen books, including three books co-authored with John Dominic Crossan,  The Last Week ( 2006),  The First Christmas (2007), and The First Paul (2009).  He is described by The New York Times as “a leading figure in his generation of Jesus scholars.”
 
(The support of the Dykes Foundation for this event is greatly appreciated)
 
* * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
People Before Profits
 
VOTE – It’s Not Illegal Yet
 
Whatever you do may seem insignificant but it is most important that you do it.            -Ghandi
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
CARING FOR CREATION
 
March 31 – April 3, 2011
 
Lake Junaluska, North Carolina
 
for
brochure and registration
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
 
Do one thing every day that scares you.                        -Eleanor Roosevelt
 
Feminism is the radical Notion that Women Are People
 
Reduce, Recycle, Reuse, Restore
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
SEA WORLD GIVES GRANTS
 
The conservation fund set up by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment recently awarded more than $1 million in grants aimed at protecting endangered species around the world.
 
The SeaWorld & Busch Gardens Conservation Fund grants will go 95 wildlife-protection projects and help everything from sand tiger sharks and West African manatees to bald eagles and African elephants.
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
Celebrate Community – Honor Diversity
 
Read Banned Books
 
Enjoy Life.  This is Not a Dress Rehearsal.
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
HARVEST KALE

Kale, that superhero among greens, is a tasty, nutrient-rich member of the Brassica family, which includes cabbage and collards.  Like its cousins, kale is sturdy and toothsome, holding its own in almost any dish.  It’s packed with beta carotene, vitamin C and other nutrients, and research suggests it helps the body fight cancer-causing chemicals.  A hardy, cool-weather crop, it’s even sweeter after a frost.  Long live the amazing kale!
 
  • * * * * * * * * * * *
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
Honor Teachers
 
IF You Think Education Is Expensive, Try Ignorance
 
Invest in Weapons Of Mass INSTRUCTION
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
THE SCOTT ERA
 
Rick Scott is Florida’s new, self-proclaimed, CEO-governor.  He begins his term today with pledges to shrink government, cut taxes, rid business of burdensome regulations and dramatically overhaul education.
 
Scott will soon discover that Florida has one of the weakest governor/CEO offices in the country; that the real power lies with legislative leaders who have their own plans and ambitions.
 
His vow to shrink government will be challenged by the fact that Florida already as the leanest state workforce in America.
 
And his promise to cut taxes will be complicated by the reality of a $3.5 billion revenue shortfall and the loss of $2.6 billion in federal stimulus funds.
 
Add to that the fact that Scott’s most radical “reform,” his plan to offer private school vouchers to all Florida families, seems in conflict with at least two state constitutional amendments.
 
For all of those hurdles, we expect that Rick Scott will indeed preside over an era of dramatic change in Florida governance.
 
Whether his intention to operate state government more like a business will improve or complicate the lives of Floridians may not be known for years.
 
In any case, today is not a day to second-guess our new governor but to wish him well a the beginning of a new term that is sure to bring with it a steep learning curve.
 
Among the things we hop CEO/Gov Scott will come to learn is the need to make each decision with careful thought as to how it will impact the long-term future of Florida and Floridians.  Campaign promises are a dime a dozen, but the damages done by decisions based solely on the immediate fiscal and political bottom-line can be incalculable.
 
The Gainesville Sun
January 4, 2011
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
BUMPER STICKER WISDOM
 
God, Please Save Me From Your Followers
 
Your Silence Will Not Protect You                                                 -Audre Lorde
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
FIVE BEST THINGS TO SAY IF YOU GET CAUGHT SLEEPING AT YOUR DESK
 
Number 5: They told me at the Blood Bank this might happen.
 
Number 4: This is just a 15 minute power nap they raved about in the time-management course you sent me to.
 
Number 3:  Whew!  Guess I left the top off the White-out.  You probably got here just in time!
 
Number 2: Did you ever notice sound coming out of these keyboards when you put your ear down real close?
 
Number 1: And MY all time favorite best thing to say if you get sleeping at your desk:
  (raising our head slowly)  …in Jesus’ name, Amen.
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
 
 
 

#5741 From: SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:00 pm
Subject: Taylor County Board of Commissioners meeting , 2/15/2011, 6:00 pm
SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents@yahoogroups.com
Send Email Send Email
 
Reminder from:   SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents Yahoo! Group
 
Title:   Taylor County Board of Commissioners meeting
 
Date:   Tuesday February 15, 2011
Time:   6:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Repeats:   This event repeats every month on the third Tuesday.
Location:   Downtown Perry, old post office; 102 East Green Street
Phone:   Diane at 850 584 4329
Notes:   6:00 P.M. Taylor County Commission meeting
 
Copyright © 2011  Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

#5742 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:09 pm
Subject: 10 Years and Still Fighting Dirty
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 
From: Denny Larson <denny@...>
Subject: 10 Years and Still Fighting Dirty

You're receiving this newsletter because you have expressed interest in Global Community Monitor.

Having trouble reading this email? View it on your browser . Not interested anymore? Click here to unsubscribe.

Global Community Monitor

Dear Floridians Against Incinerators ,

This year Global Community Monitor is celebrating our 10th Anniversary, and we are grateful that you have been a part of our fight against dirty - dirty air, dirty companies and dirty practices and policies.

Rather than resting on our laurels, GCM and our community partners have stayed busy because the fight for clean air is still not over.

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is emerging as a health threat that needs to be dealt with - in New York, Colorado and nationally

In India, the real impact of toxic chemicals was recently felt as 300 people were hospitalized after a chlorine gas leak.

While families suffer from pollution, the EPA has shocked fenceline communities nationwide by exempting oil refineries from hazardous waste control requirements.

Despite all the challenges we face, we also want to shine a spotlight on a community member - Hilton Kelley - who is using the power of the Buckets to make the world a better place.

A decade after we started with one man with a bucket, we have many great achievements, but we got a lot of work still ahead of us and we are counting on your continued involvement in our fight for clean air and healthy communities.

Sincerely,

Denny Larson
Executive Director
Global Community Monitor

Hr

Happy Birthday to US!

Content Inline

Join us this year in celebrating ten years of breathing new life into communities.

With your help, we've established ourselves as a successful organization. Together with our community partners, we are building a movement and proving the Buckets can make a difference.

Thank you for joining us in the fight for clean air and healthy communities. Stay tuned for some special opportunities later this year. Read more

Hr

Battles over hydraulic fracturing heating up across the US

Inline

Fracking, a dirty natural gas drilling method, is rearing its ugly head across the US.

In Colorado, residents have been forced from their homes. In New York, a fractured fracking law was put on the books. Nationally, the EPA has called out fracking for potentially violating the Clean Water Act.

Digging deeper into the issue, Program Coordinator Jessica Hendricks looks at an eviction caused by fracking and how legal precedents may be established that will protect communities facing a wide range of toxic threats. Read more

Hr

Texas: SPotlight on a Community leader - Hilton Kelley

Inline

Texas community partner and GCM Board member Hilton Kelley is a prime example of how people living next to oil refineries and other polluters can use the Bucket Brigade to win change. Learn more about the work and accomplishments of Hilton.

We are proud be working with people like Hilton.

Hr

India: Chlorine gas leak hospitalizes 300

Inline

A chlorine gas leak from Chemfab Alkali's plant in Pondicherry underscores the need for continued reform of industrial practices in India. More than 300 fenceline neighbors were hospitalized. GCM continues to work with our community partner, Community Environmental Monitoring, in India to press for changes that will protect humans and the environment. Read more

Hr

US: EPA Allows oil refineries to keep hazardous waste Loophole

Inline

Despite a petition from community groups and environmental groups, Obama's EPA is extending a loophole that allows oil refineries to burn more 300,000 tons of hazardous waste each year without meeting standards for storing, transporting and burning it.

In particular, GCM believes this could have major impacts in California, which ranks third in the nation in refining capacity. Read more

Take Action

Urge the EPA to protect children by not allowing schools to be sited near toxic polluters. Quick and easy: send your email comment by February 18th.

Take Action
Small Hr

Donate

Make a special gift to help us celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary by raising $10,000 in critical funds to get our Bucket Brigades into communities in crisis.

Donate!
Small Hr

Follow Us

In addition to following us on Facebook, you can get the most up-to-date news on our Air Hugger blog

GCM Blog

Global Community Monitor Email News and Updates
PO Box 1784, El Cerrito CA 94530 : +1 (510) 233-1870

To subscribe, visit http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=LXEFEGbKMvtCzFajF3Rt9j8ZkvmWOCun.

empowered by Salsa

#5743 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:24 pm
Subject: Cellulosic ethanol plant closure bursts Ga.’s biomass bubble
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
Atlanta Business News 4:49 a.m. Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Plant closure bursts Ga.’s biomass bubble

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

SOPERTON — The premise, and the promise, were brilliant in their simplicity: Turn tree waste into fuel, help break the Middle Eastern choke hold on America’s economy and bring hundreds of jobs to rural Georgia.

Range Fuels brewed this batch of methanol in August 2010 for its first run of production. The factory closed last month after producing only 100,000 gallons of cellulosic ethanol.
Bita Honarvar, bhonarvar@... Range Fuels brewed this batch of methanol in August 2010 for its first run of production. The factory closed last month after producing only 100,000 gallons of cellulosic ethanol.

 

What wasn’t there to like?

Plenty, starting with the closing last month of the Range Fuels cellulosic ethanol factory that promised to help make Georgia a national leader in alternative energy production. Then there’s the money — more than $162 million in local, state and federal grants, loans and other subsidies committed to the venture.

Much of that has been spent; recovery would be difficult. Officials at Colorado-based Range Fuels, who didn’t return calls for this story, have said they plan to eventually re-open the Soperton plant.

But critics — ranging from budget hawks to renewable energy experts to dispirited locals — say the shutdown is a case of good money thrown at unproven science and lofty promises.

“We gave those subsidies in hopes of getting something in return — jobs,” said Wallace Little, a laid-off special ed teacher from Soperton who applied for a Range job. “And we hope they come back, as far-fetched as that sounds. We need jobs. We need them bad.”

Over the last six years, Georgia has successfully wooed a variety of companies specializing in biomass — cellulosic ethanol, corn ethanol, biodiesel, wood pellet, wood-to-electricity — with the goal of becoming a renewable energy leader. Many of the companies, though, are no longer in business.

Vinod Khosla, the dot-com billionaire behind Range Fuels, vowed in 2007 to “declare a war on oil” and said “cellulosic ethanol is the weapon we need.”

State and national officials were giddy when ground was broken later that year for the $225 million ethanol distillery outside Soperton, 155 miles southeast of Atlanta.

“Range Fuels represents a new future for our country,” proclaimed then-Gov. Sonny Perdue, flanked by dignitaries and beauty queens. “With Georgia’s vast, sustainable and renewable forests, we will lead the nation.”

U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, who steered a $76 million federal grant to Range, said that “by relying on American ingenuity and on American farmers for fuel, we will enhance our nation’s energy and economic security.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture followed up with an $80 million loan guarantee. Georgia officials pledged $6.2 million. Treutlen County, one of the state’s poorest, offered 20 years worth of tax abatements and 97 acres in its industrial park.

Private investors reportedly put up $158 million. In all, the project raised more than $320 million.

It hasn’t been enough.

By now, Range had expected to produce 20 million gallons of ethanol. Seventy Georgians would have jobs, denting Treutlen’s 13.3 percent unemployment rate.

Range shut down in early January. Only a few employees in Soperton remain.

Bud Klepper, plant manager for Range Fuels, told The Soperton News that the shutdown is “not permanent,” adding that the company seeks additional financing.

“We’re just taking him at his word that it’s just a temporary shut down,” said John Lee, executive director of Treutlen’s development authority. “There’s nothing else we can do.”

Ryan Alexander, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense in Washington, said the government should seek to get its money back.

“Cellulosic ethanol might be a better alternative for the environment, but the government needs to act with fiduciary responsibility and take care of tax dollars to minimize our risk,” she said. “Recouping that money should be on the table.”

State saw gold in plan

Range and Georgia seemed a perfect match. Georgia has 24 million acres of forests, and Range said it had the money and the science to build the nation’s first commercially successful cellulosic ethanol factory.

Tree limbs, grasses, cornstalks, hog manure, municipal garbage and other limitless supplies would be transformed into fuel to be blended with gasoline. Less oil would mean fewer greenhouse gases. Because the process doesn’t use corn, food prices wouldn’t be affected.

Range said the factory would open in 2008 and eventually brew 100 million gallons a year. Company officials talked of a dozen plants across Georgia, producing a billion gallons of ethanol and filling local and state treasuries.

Georgia officials were smitten. A University of Georgia economic impact study concluded that Treutlen County alone would gain 194 direct (factory-related) and indirect (restaurant, hardware store, etc.) jobs with an annual $5.8 million payroll. UGA pegged the statewide economic impact at $150 million.

In October 2007, Georgia awarded Range $6.2 million from the OneGeorgia fund, which uses tobacco settlement money for rural development. The Range subsidy is one of the largest grants ever given by OneGeorgia.

Range told Georgia officials that other states were also in the running for the cellulosic factory. OneGeorgia’s governing board, which included Perdue, Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle and the directors of the state’s economic development, community affairs and revenue departments, decided the $6.2 million grant would help seal the deal.

“The majority of the companies we work with have historically strong track records of success,” said Nancy Cobb, executive director of OneGeorgia. She added that officials “recognized that, particularly in rural Georgia, a small portion of tobacco settlement money should be calibrated toward higher risk projects with the potential for a higher return on investment.”

Range used the grant to buy a catalytic converter, feedstock distributor and an auger. All but $200,000 has been spent, Cobb said, adding that Georgia isn’t likely to receive any money back. Under terms of the contract, Range has until 2015 to invest at least $150 million into the factory and create at least 50 jobs before the state would consider any penalties.

“We always anticipated that this was going to be a challenging project,” Cobb said. “We don’t yet know if Range Fuels will take this project to the next level with another group of investors or whether someone else will acquire them. But we’re not throwing in the towel at this point.”

Washington, too, believed in Range and Khosla, who co-founded Sun Microsystems. In return for the federal grant and loan guarantee, the government expected progress toward an alternative energy future. The Environmental Protection Agency pegged cellulosic ethanol production at 100 million gallons in 2010, of which Range was supposed to produce one-fifth.

Production fell short

That was wishful thinking.

EPA, citing technical and financial difficulties bedeviling the nation’s six cellulosic ethanol producers, slashed the mandate to 6.5 million gallons for 2010. Critics doubt even that amount was manufactured.

Alabama’s Cello Energy, for example, also expected to produce 20 million gallons, never made a drop and closed after its owner was found guilty of misrepresenting its science and the company went bankrupt. Khosla Ventures, Vinod Khosla’s private equity firm, reportedly invested $12.5 million in Cello.

The EPA eventually lowered Range’s cellulosic ethanol output to 100,000 gallons, which Range said it produced, according to Klepper, before shutting down.

David Aldous, president of Range Fuels, told a Colorado newspaper last month he was seeking more money to ramp-up production in Soperton to a commercially feasible level. He also said the factory had trouble processing its raw material, mainly pine scrap.

“Their technology did not work,” said Sam Shelton, research director for Georgia Tech’s Strategic Energy Institute who has long questioned Range’s scientific claims. “It was a high-risk technological development program. Chemical processing plants just don’t scale-up that fast. They were promising too much too quick.”

The Energy Department largely concurred.

“The final step — catalytic conversion of the gasifier products to ethanol — could not be successfully demonstrated with the time and funding available in this project,” the agency recently wrote.

The Energy Department suspended payments to Range last month thereby “reducing future financial risk for the American taxpayers.” In an e-mail to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the agency said it had given Range $43.6 million so far with another $5 million obligated. It did not return calls seeking clarification.

Folks in Soperton can only hope Range re-opens.

“You see what it’s like around here. Businesses are closing. Storefronts are empty,” said Little, the former school teacher. “I see hope moving further and further away.”

For now, though, Soperton’s future sits mirage-like on the edge of town — shiny, but silent and unused.

“If nothing else,” quipped Lee, the economic developer, “it would make a nice Jack Daniels distillery.”

 
 

 ***********************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5744 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:20 pm
Subject: Georgia forests worth more standing than incinerated
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

02/15/2011


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
***************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5745 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:26 pm
Subject: Mercury. Arsenic. Lead.
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "Elizabeth Ouzts, Environment Florida Regional Program Director" action@...
Subject: Mercury. Arsenic. Lead.
edited

Dear friend,

It’s 2011. We shouldn’t have to worry about mercury, arsenic and lead in the St. Marys, the Suwannee River, the Fenholloway and other Florida rivers. We shouldn’t have to worry that 335,692 Florida kids with asthma risk their health every time they play outside. We shouldn’t have to worry that our air is too polluted for our families to safely breathe — and yet you and I still face these problems every day, whether we know it or not. Will you take action today to help us fight the leading cause of this dangerous pollution?

What’s the culprit? Coal-fired power plants, pulp and paper mills, which spew a toxic cocktail of mercury, lead, soot and other pollutants into our air every day. This deadly mix then falls into our waterways in the form of rain, poisoning the fish we eat and putting our family’s health and our own health at risk.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is set to update the Clean Air Act next month to help keep coal-fired power plants and other polluters from polluting our air.

The biggest polluters and their allies in Congress won’t take this lying down — they’ll pressure the EPA to weaken the rules or ditch them altogether. For the EPA to set a tough enough standard to protect our health from toxic air pollution, they need to know the people of Florida support them, even if the polluters don’t.

Please tell the EPA you want them to stand up for your health by setting a strong standard to stop coal and pulp and paper plants’ toxic air pollution.

Thanks,

Elizabeth Ouzts
Regional Program Director Environment Florida



Donate today. A cleaner, greener future is within our reach. Your donation today can help us bring the vision we share a little closer to reality.

 *******************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 


#5746 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Thu Feb 17, 2011 5:39 pm
Subject: Cellulosic ethanol plant closure bursts Ga.’s biomass bubble
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 
POOR OL' TAXPAYER
 

http://www.ajc.com/business/plant-closure-bursts-ga-838588.html
 
Atlanta Business News 4:49 a.m. Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Plant closure bursts Ga.’s biomass bubble

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

SOPERTON — The premise, and the promise, were brilliant in their simplicity: Turn tree waste into fuel, help break the Middle Eastern choke hold on America’s economy and bring hundreds of jobs to rural Georgia.

Range Fuels brewed this batch of methanol in August 2010 for its first run of production. The factory closed last month after producing only 100,000 gallons of cellulosic ethanol.
Bita Honarvar, bhonarvar@... Range Fuels brewed this batch of methanol in August 2010 for its first run of production. The factory closed last month after producing only 100,000 gallons of cellulosic ethanol.

 

What wasn’t there to like?

Plenty, starting with the closing last month of the Range Fuels cellulosic ethanol factory that promised to help make Georgia a national leader in alternative energy production. Then there’s the money — more than $162 million in local, state and federal grants, loans and other subsidies committed to the venture.

Much of that has been spent; recovery would be difficult. Officials at Colorado-based Range Fuels, who didn’t return calls for this story, have said they plan to eventually re-open the Soperton plant.

But critics — ranging from budget hawks to renewable energy experts to dispirited locals — say the shutdown is a case of good money thrown at unproven science and lofty promises.

“We gave those subsidies in hopes of getting something in return — jobs,” said Wallace Little, a laid-off special ed teacher from Soperton who applied for a Range job. “And we hope they come back, as far-fetched as that sounds. We need jobs. We need them bad.”

Over the last six years, Georgia has successfully wooed a variety of companies specializing in biomass — cellulosic ethanol, corn ethanol, biodiesel, wood pellet, wood-to-electricity — with the goal of becoming a renewable energy leader. Many of the companies, though, are no longer in business.

Vinod Khosla, the dot-com billionaire behind Range Fuels, vowed in 2007 to “declare a war on oil” and said “cellulosic ethanol is the weapon we need.”

State and national officials were giddy when ground was broken later that year for the $225 million ethanol distillery outside Soperton, 155 miles southeast of Atlanta.

“Range Fuels represents a new future for our country,” proclaimed then-Gov. Sonny Perdue, flanked by dignitaries and beauty queens. “With Georgia’s vast, sustainable and renewable forests, we will lead the nation.”

U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, who steered a $76 million federal grant to Range, said that “by relying on American ingenuity and on American farmers for fuel, we will enhance our nation’s energy and economic security.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture followed up with an $80 million loan guarantee. Georgia officials pledged $6.2 million. Treutlen County, one of the state’s poorest, offered 20 years worth of tax abatements and 97 acres in its industrial park.

Private investors reportedly put up $158 million. In all, the project raised more than $320 million.

It hasn’t been enough.

By now, Range had expected to produce 20 million gallons of ethanol. Seventy Georgians would have jobs, denting Treutlen’s 13.3 percent unemployment rate.

Range shut down in early January. Only a few employees in Soperton remain.

Bud Klepper, plant manager for Range Fuels, told The Soperton News that the shutdown is “not permanent,” adding that the company seeks additional financing.

“We’re just taking him at his word that it’s just a temporary shut down,” said John Lee, executive director of Treutlen’s development authority. “There’s nothing else we can do.”

Ryan Alexander, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense in Washington, said the government should seek to get its money back.

“Cellulosic ethanol might be a better alternative for the environment, but the government needs to act with fiduciary responsibility and take care of tax dollars to minimize our risk,” she said. “Recouping that money should be on the table.”

State saw gold in plan

Range and Georgia seemed a perfect match. Georgia has 24 million acres of forests, and Range said it had the money and the science to build the nation’s first commercially successful cellulosic ethanol factory.

Tree limbs, grasses, cornstalks, hog manure, municipal garbage and other limitless supplies would be transformed into fuel to be blended with gasoline. Less oil would mean fewer greenhouse gases. Because the process doesn’t use corn, food prices wouldn’t be affected.

Range said the factory would open in 2008 and eventually brew 100 million gallons a year. Company officials talked of a dozen plants across Georgia, producing a billion gallons of ethanol and filling local and state treasuries.

Georgia officials were smitten. A University of Georgia economic impact study concluded that Treutlen County alone would gain 194 direct (factory-related) and indirect (restaurant, hardware store, etc.) jobs with an annual $5.8 million payroll. UGA pegged the statewide economic impact at $150 million.

In October 2007, Georgia awarded Range $6.2 million from the OneGeorgia fund, which uses tobacco settlement money for rural development. The Range subsidy is one of the largest grants ever given by OneGeorgia.

Range told Georgia officials that other states were also in the running for the cellulosic factory. OneGeorgia’s governing board, which included Perdue, Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle and the directors of the state’s economic development, community affairs and revenue departments, decided the $6.2 million grant would help seal the deal.

“The majority of the companies we work with have historically strong track records of success,” said Nancy Cobb, executive director of OneGeorgia. She added that officials “recognized that, particularly in rural Georgia, a small portion of tobacco settlement money should be calibrated toward higher risk projects with the potential for a higher return on investment.”

Range used the grant to buy a catalytic converter, feedstock distributor and an auger. All but $200,000 has been spent, Cobb said, adding that Georgia isn’t likely to receive any money back. Under terms of the contract, Range has until 2015 to invest at least $150 million into the factory and create at least 50 jobs before the state would consider any penalties.

“We always anticipated that this was going to be a challenging project,” Cobb said. “We don’t yet know if Range Fuels will take this project to the next level with another group of investors or whether someone else will acquire them. But we’re not throwing in the towel at this point.”

Washington, too, believed in Range and Khosla, who co-founded Sun Microsystems. In return for the federal grant and loan guarantee, the government expected progress toward an alternative energy future. The Environmental Protection Agency pegged cellulosic ethanol production at 100 million gallons in 2010, of which Range was supposed to produce one-fifth.

Production fell short

That was wishful thinking.

EPA, citing technical and financial difficulties bedeviling the nation’s six cellulosic ethanol producers, slashed the mandate to 6.5 million gallons for 2010. Critics doubt even that amount was manufactured.

Alabama’s Cello Energy, for example, also expected to produce 20 million gallons, never made a drop and closed after its owner was found guilty of misrepresenting its science and the company went bankrupt. Khosla Ventures, Vinod Khosla’s private equity firm, reportedly invested $12.5 million in Cello.

The EPA eventually lowered Range’s cellulosic ethanol output to 100,000 gallons, which Range said it produced, according to Klepper, before shutting down.

David Aldous, president of Range Fuels, told a Colorado newspaper last month he was seeking more money to ramp-up production in Soperton to a commercially feasible level. He also said the factory had trouble processing its raw material, mainly pine scrap.

“Their technology did not work,” said Sam Shelton, research director for Georgia Tech’s Strategic Energy Institute who has long questioned Range’s scientific claims. “It was a high-risk technological development program. Chemical processing plants just don’t scale-up that fast. They were promising too much too quick.”

The Energy Department largely concurred.

“The final step — catalytic conversion of the gasifier products to ethanol — could not be successfully demonstrated with the time and funding available in this project,” the agency recently wrote.

The Energy Department suspended payments to Range last month thereby “reducing future financial risk for the American taxpayers.” In an e-mail to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the agency said it had given Range $43.6 million so far with another $5 million obligated. It did not return calls seeking clarification.

Folks in Soperton can only hope Range re-opens.

“You see what it’s like around here. Businesses are closing. Storefronts are empty,” said Little, the former school teacher. “I see hope moving further and further away.”

For now, though, Soperton’s future sits mirage-like on the edge of town — shiny, but silent and unused.

“If nothing else,” quipped Lee, the economic developer, “it would make a nice Jack Daniels distillery.”

 
 

 ***********************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HopeForCleanWater/   http://grooups.yahoo.com/group/EANoF/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FloridiansAgainstIncineratorsInDisguise/  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents/
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

1 of 1 Photo(s)

320

#5747 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:49 pm
Subject: Two California Biomass plants fined for air violations
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 
 

Two California biomass plants fined for emissions violations

By Anna Austin | February 15, 2011

After completing a joint investigation, the U.S. EPA and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District ordered two California biomass power plants to pay combined civil penalties of $835,000 to resolve alleged violations of the federal Clean Air Act and district rules, including excess emissions of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and fine particulates.


The settlements require Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass LLC to pay a total of $343,000 and Merced Power LLC to pay $492,000. The companies are also required to go through multiple steps to ensure future compliance, including installation of devices to improve monitoring and reporting of air pollutants, enhancing automation of the control systems for nitrogen oxides emissions and preparing more stringent control plans to minimize emissions of air pollutants.


Both plants have already made progress in complying with EPA orders. The agency reported that so far, each have installed controls that reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides by up to 180 tons per year and carbon monoxide by up to 365 tons per year. EPA and the district will continue to monitor both facilities for an additional two years to ensure completion of all requirements, EPA said.


Both Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass and Merced Power are refurbished 12.5- megawatt wood-fired power plants that began operating in 2008, and are located within 13 miles of each other in the San Joaquin Valley south of Sacramento. Owned by Global Ampersand LLC, the power they generate is purchased by California’s Pacific Gas and Electric Co.


EPA spokeswoman Margot Perez-Sullivan said the plants were investigated on a case-by-case basis so the agency could not presume anything about Clean Air Act compliance of the biomass power industry in general. She said due to the confidential nature of EPA’s enforcement issues, it could not provide any additional details on the investigation.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments welcome...




http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/02/ca-biomass-plants-fined-for-air-violations?cmpid=rss

CA Biomass Plants Fined for Air Violations

By Robert Crowe, Contributor   |   February 17, 2011
EPA action comes as industry awaits MACT boiler ruling.
California, USA -- A pair of biomass power plants touted for the clean energy they would provide California's Central Valley will pay some hefty fines for polluting the region's air, regulators said this week.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District ordered Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass LLC and Merced Power LLC to pay a combined civil penalty of $835,000 to resolve alleged violations of local regulations and the federal Clean Air Act. The EPA said the plants emitted excess amounts of nitrogen oxides and fine particulates.

The plants agreed to pay the fines through settlements that also require installation of devices that enhance control systems for nitrogen oxide emissions and improve air monitoring and reporting of pollutants. The San Juan Valley exceeds national health standards for ozone and particulate matter. Elevated nitrogen oxides are precursors to ozone, according to the EPA.

The EPA ordered the facilities to install controls that reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides by up to 180 tons per year and carbon monoxide by up to 365 tons per year, which they have put in place. Federal and local regulators will now continue to monitor the plants for two years.

“EPA is committed to doing our part to tackle the worst air quality in the nation,” Jared Blumenfeld, EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest, said in a prepared statement this week. “San Joaquin Valley communities can now breathe easier as a result of the significant pollution controls won in these settlements.”

Each 12.5 MW facility generates electricity by burning wood construction waste, agricultural waste and other organic materials. In December, Akeida Capital Management LLC, a New York-based environmental asset management firm, purchased the plants from Global Ampersand of Boston.

The power plants have been operational since 2008. Combined, they provide power to the region through a 15-year power purchase agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. Akeida provided the plants with $12.5 million in operating capital in June 2009.

The plants, located about 12 miles apart near the Merced area, were built in the 1980s, but they were inoperable for decades before investors refurbished them in 2007 and 2008.

The recent action was initiated by the EPA’s Regional Administrator for the Pacific Southwest. It appears to be the EPA’s first major enforcement of regulations on new biomass facilities since the agency announced last month that it would delay for three years the permitting requirements for greenhouse gas-emitting biomass facilities. The EPA plans to work with the industry, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and scientists to research carbon dioxide emissions from biomass plants before establishing permitting those requirements.

The industry is still awaiting the EPA’s ruling on the Maximum Achievable Control Technology standards for boilers, also known as the Clean Air Act Boiler MACT, which could increase the overall capital costs for biomass facilities.

Coal-fired and biomass-fired boilers are major sources of hazardous air pollutions, according to the EPA. Under the MACT, biomass and coal-fired plants might have to install a variety of filters and scrubbers to better control emissions of mercury and particulate matter. Some in the biomass industry – particularly in the Southeast United States, where many biomass projects are underway – fear the costs of installing such equipment might prohibit the development of biomass power plants.

 

Look for more on utility-scale biomass power projects in the Southeast in an upcoming feature story on RenewableEnergyWorld.com.

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2011/02/ca-biomass-plants-fined-for-air-violations?cmpid=rss

  RenewableEnergyWorld.com
 
 
******************************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5748 From: FINDJohnJ@...
Date: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:45 pm
Subject: Everything Is Connected - John Jackson's Email
FINDJohnJ@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED!
 
Report #1:     Poetry                       
Report #2:     Congregational Life
Report #3:     Every Day Is Earth Day
Report #3:     Here’s To Your Health
Report #4:     Floridians, How Do You Like Your Government Now?
Report #5:     Laughter Is The Best Medicine
 
* * * * * * *
 
CLIMATE AT BAY
 
The rhythms of the season
How poorly we feel them
Having provided ourselves
With central heating
And air conditioning
In house and school
In car and office
With buildings whose
Windows never open
With lighting
Of our own making
A climate we keep at bay
All has become
Homogenized
In our riches
We have become
Pathetically poor
Life – quite dull.
 
                        j.j.adam
                        Minneapolis 1996
 
.* * * * * * * * *
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wound’s, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
      Abraham Lincoln
 
* * * * * * * * *
 
THERE IS MISSION
 
Wherever hearts overflow with the love of God
And joy-filled voices sing God’s praise
 
There is Mission
 
Wherever hearts break and tears flow
And people bend beneath heavy burdens
 
There is Mission
 
Wherever hearts open to invite in
                                                                        Strangers and enemies no less than neighbors
 
There is Mission
 
Wherever hearts cry out for justice and peace
                                                                        And dream of a far better world
 
There is Mission
 
Wherever borders dissolve and walls collapse
                                                                        Until all become sisters and brothers
 
There is Mission
 
Wherever the reign of God calls people to leave what is
                                                                        And sacrifice all for what yet might be
 
There is Mission
 
Reflection on Maryknoll’s 100th Year
By Joseph R. Veneroso, M.M.
 
 
 
* * * * * * * * *
My fellow Americans; ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.  My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.                                                        John F. Kennedy
 
 
* * * * * * *
ALLIANCE FOR INTERNATIONAL REFORESTATION, INC.
 
Dear John
 
You have supported AIR’s work since the very beginning (when you helped us purchase our first pick-up truck with Presbytery 2Ë Per Meal funds), so I want to emphasize that we have not just been static during those years.  Of course, we are still a small, close-knit organization – but we have doubled the number of trees planted each year (averaging 200,000 per year!) due to the experience and organizational skills of the technicians.  In addition, we have constructed over 750 fuel-efficient stoves, begun a scholarship program for teenager, and printed an environmental curriculum.
 
Also, AIR has become much more focused on gathering long-term accurate data about the rates of tree growth, the sustainability of the three nurseries and new forests, and even the amount of carbon sequestered.  We are an organization that is now 17 years old, so we can visit the earliest projects and document that forests planted in the 1990’s are still standing and providing benefits to the local residents and to the planet.
 
I will be traveling to Guatemala from January 5th to 19th (in addition to the summer months), and I ask your prayers for our health and safety.  Meanwhile, on behalf of Ceci, Don Miguel, Pedro Miguel, Claudia, Carlos, Mario, Argentina, Luis, and the thousand of villagers they have served, thank you!
 
Wishing you Every Blessing in the New Year
 
Anne Motley Hallum
Founder and Chair of the Board of Directors
The Alliance for International Reforestation, Inc.
 
Stetson University
CampusUnit 8301, Deland, Fl. 32723
386-822-7575
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
Freedom and the dignity of the individual have been more available and assured here than in any other place on Earth.                                                                                                        Ronald Reagan
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
WHAT IS AN A1C TEST?
 
Seems like my doctor is always ordering it.
 
When a person with diabetes sees an endocrinologist, they soon learn about a test called hemoglobin A1C or HbA1c, or simply, A1c.  The A1C, they are told, should be as low as possible (The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists [AACE] recommends a level of 6.5% or less).  A person with diabetes may also learn that an A1C of 6.5% is a benchmark for diagnosing diabetes.
 
What is A1C? Is it truly useful? What does it mean as a benchmark of diabetes control?
 
A1C represents the attachment of glucose (sugar) to hemoglobin (the oxygen-carrying protein in our red blood cells).  The red blood cells need glucose for their metabolism.  When the hemoglobin in the red blood cell meets glucose, glucose slowly (over days and weeks) attaches to an amino acid on the hemoglobin.  At this time, a person’s A1C level would show the amount of glucose that the red blood cells have been exposed to over time.  Since the average life of a red blood cell is 3 to 4 months, the A1C shows an average blood sugar level, not just at the time the blood test was done, but during the long period leading up to that time.
 
Normally, when a person does not have diabetes, their blood sugar is below 100 mg/dL before meals, and it rarely rises over 120-130 mg/dL after meals.  In these circumstances, the A1C is around 5%.  This means that 5% of the hemoglobin molecules in that person’s millions of red blood cells have glucose attached.  In mild diabetes (with a fasting blood glucose just over 125 mg/dL or the blood sugar 2 hours after an oral glucose tolerance test around 200 mg/dL), the A1C will be over 6%.  So, 6% of their hemoglobin molecules have glucose attached.
 
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) has recommended that though it makes sense to use A1C to diagnose diabetes, the test can be misleading.  So, if a doctor finds that a patient’s A1C level is 6.5%, AACE terms it diagnostic of diabetes.  AACE does recommend confirming this with the blood sugar reading “when feasible,” although my opinion is that blood sugar measurements should always be done.  Certainly, if the patient’s diabetes status is not clear, the patient should have an oral glucose tolerance test.  If the fasting glucose is 126 mg/dL or more or the 2-hour glucose is 200 mg/dL or more, then diabetes is confirmed.  This approach, patients checking their own blood sugar (for diagnosed diabetes) and careful glucose testing (to diagnose diabetes), allows us to determine the diabetes condition of each person.
 
Zachary T. Bloomgarden, MD FACE
Dr. Bloomgarden has a national reputation
for writing and lecturing on diabetes. He is
Clinical Professor in the Department of Medicine
and is active in the Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism
of the Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York New York.
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
This country will not be a good place for any of us to live in unless we make it a good place for all of us to live in.  ~Theodore Roosevelt
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
TUCSON SHOOTING SHOWS WE MAKE IT TOO EASY FOR DANGEROUS AND IRRESPONSIBLE PEOPLE TO GET GUNS.
 
The 22 year-old shooter in Tucson was not allowed to enlist in the military, was asked to leave school,  and was considered “very disturbed” (according to former classmates), but that’s not enough to keep someone from legally buying as many guns as they want in America.
 
People find this surprising, but sadly, it’s true, and we ought to be angry about it.
 
The troubles of the Tucson shooter are more proof that we make it too easy for dangerous and irresponsible people to get guns in this country.  We have too few laws to protect our families and communities from this kind of bloodshed, and the laws we do have are riddled with too many loopholes.  Arizona, as it turns out, has almost no gun laws.
 
Paul Helmke, President
Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
The physical configuration of the earth has separated us from all of the Old World, but the common brotherhood of man, the highest law of all our being, has united us by inseparable bonds with all humanity.                                                                                      Calvin Coolidge
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
BENEFIT CUTS, BENEFIT CUTS, AND MORE BENEFIT CUTS
 
Today, a new Congress is considering numerous proposals that would address part of the federal debt crisis through unfair changes to Social Security and Medicare.  These proposals rely far too heavily on benefit cuts, which will hurt millions of Americans. 
 
1. Reduce the Social Security COLA           
            If passed, this proposal would immediately impose a benefit cut on current retirees in
2012.   Using a new method to calculate the annual cost-of-living adjustment, the COLA
would be progressively lowered every year, from that point forward.
 
2. Shift more Medicare costs to seniors.
            Currently, out-of-pocket costs for Medicare Parts B and D consume 30% of the average
Social Security benefit.  This proposal would impose over $100 billion in cuts that directly increase seniors’ already high out-of-pocket costs.  Compare this to the Affordable Care Act, which is on target to provide billions of dollars in savings from Medicare without impacting beneficiaries’ costs.
 
3. Raise the Social Security retirement age
            Delaying the retirement age would require older workers to stay in physically demanding
jobs unless they qualify for disability benefits.  And many older workers may be unable to find or stay in jobs because of their higher health care costs which employers must pay.  Yet this proposal would gradually nudge the retirement age to 68 by 2050 and 69 by 2075, with continued increases thereafter.  Even worse, it would result in across-the-board cuts of 15% for all beneficiaries by 2080.
 
4. Change the Social Security benefit formula.
            As a result of this complicated proposal, a worker who retires earning approximately
$43,000 per year would experience a benefit reduction of almost 5 percent beginning in 2030.  As the proposal is fully phased in, the reductions grow deeper and, ultimately, reduce benefits for all future beneficiaries.  This proposal does nothing to enhance the progressivity of the Social Security program.  All workers will see their benefits reduced.  There is not a single group of workers who will see a benefit from this change.
 
5. Reduce reimbursements to Medicare providers
            Last year’s Affordable Care Act already contains reforms incentivizing Medicare
providers to improve the efficiency and quality of health care.  However, this proposal imposes a new round of cuts even before the law’s reforms are implemented.  These cuts to provider reimbursements could significantly reduce seniors’ access to affordable health care.
 
National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
  • * * * * * * * * * * *
There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America. William J. Clinton
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
NO ONE BELIEVES SENIORS . . . EVERYONE THINKS THEY ARE SENILE.
 
An elderly couple was celebrating their sixtieth anniversary. The couple had married as childhood sweethearts and had moved back to their old neighborhood after they retired. Holding hands, they walked back to their old school. It was not locked, so they entered, and found the old desk they’d shared, where Andy had carved I love you, Sally .
 
 On their way back home, a bag of money fell out of an armored car, practically landing at their feet. Sally quickly picked it up and, not sure what to do with it, they took it home. There, she counted the money-fifty thousand dollars! Andy said, We’ve got to give it back. Sally said, Finders keepers. She put the money back in the bag and hid it in their attic. 
 
The next day, two police officers were canvassing the neighborhood looking for the money, and knocked on their door. Pardon me, did either of you find a bag that fell out of an armored car yesterday? Sally said, No. Andy said, She’s lying. She hid it up in the attic. Sally said, Don't believe him, he’s getting senile  
 
The agents turned to Andy and began to question him. One said: Tell us the story from the beginning. Andy said, Well, when Sally and I were walking home from school yesterday .... The first police officer turned to his partner and said, Were outta here!
 
 
 

#5749 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:24 pm
Subject: Fox Geezer Syndrome
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
LOL!
 
 
 

Fox Geezer Syndrome

January 30th, 2011 at 9:33 am Richmond Ramsey | 182 Comments |

| Print

Conor Friedersdorf remembers what a pain it was to live with a liberal roommate who watched Keith Olbermann every night, and would subsequently sulk around in a pissed-off mood. Friedersdorf too got a negative contact buzz from the show. He writes: “It seems to me that Olbermann’s show often brought out the worst impulses in people: petulance, self-righteousness, and blind anger at ‘the other side.’”

Sounds familiar to me, though from the other side. Except in my case, it’s not my liberal roommate. It’s my conservative parents – and maybe yours too.

Over the past couple of years, I’ve been keeping track of a trend among friends around my age (late thirties to mid-forties). Eight of us (so far) share something in common besides our conservatism: a deep frustration over how our parents have become impossible to take on the subject of politics. Without fail, it turns out that our folks have all been sitting at home watching Fox News Channel all day – especially Glenn Beck’s program.

Used to be I would call my mom and get updated on news from the neighborhood, her garden, the grandchildren, hometown gossip, and so forth. I’ve always been interested in politics, but never had the occasion to talk about them with her. She just doesn’t care.

Or didn’t. I don’t know when it happened, exactly, but she began peppering our conversation with red-hot remarks about President Obama. I would try to engage her, but unless I shared her particular judgment, and her outrage, she apparently thought that I was a dupe or a RINO. Finally I asked my father privately why Mom, who as far as I know never before had a political thought, was so worked up about Obama all the time.

“She’s been like that ever since she started watching Glenn Beck,” Dad said.

A few months later, she roped him into watching Beck, which had the same effect. Even though we’re all conservatives, I found myself having to steer our phone conversations away from politics and current events. It wasn’t that I disagreed with their opinions – though I often did – but rather that I found the vehemence with which they expressed those opinions to be so off-putting.

Then I flew out for a visit, and observed that their television was on all day long, even if no one was watching it. What channel was playing? Fox. Spending a few days in the company of the channel – especially Glenn Beck — it all became clear to me. If Fox was the window through which I saw the wider world, for hours every day, I’d be perpetually pissed off too.

Back home, I mentioned to a friend over beers how much Fox my mom and dad watched, and how angry they now were about politics.

“Yours too?!” he said. “I’ve noticed the same thing with mine. They weren’t always like this, but since they retired, they’ve gotten into Fox, and you can’t even talk to them anymore without hearing them read the riot act about Obama.”

I started to wonder how common this Fox Geezer Syndrome was. I began to poll conservative friends of my generation who had right-wing parents. At least eight different people – not an Obama voter among them, and one of them actually a George W. Bush political appointee in Washington – told me that yes, they had observed a correlation between the fevered emotionalism of their elderly parents’ politics, and increased exposure to Fox News.

After the Tucson shootings, Fox chief Roger Ailes said he had told his crew to “tone it down.” I’m skeptical, but I hope he succeeds. One of the great advantages of a conservative disposition is a suspicion of emotions, and emotionalism. The dumbest decisions I’ve ever made, about politics and everything else, were executed while I was worked up about something, and trusted my emotional response. Passion is inevitable – we are only human, after all – and can be constructive when properly channeled. But passion is the enemy of clear thought and, when given free reign, is the prerequisite for mob rule.

Unbridled anger at the deserving enemies is a danger to the civil order, and ultimately to ourselves. Remember Thomas More’s warning to the hotheaded William Roper in A Man For All Seasons, when Roper accused More of going easy on a scoundrel who hadn’t (yet) broken the law. Roper charged More with wanting to give the Devil the benefit of the law.

“This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s!” More responded. “And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?”

More adds that he would give the Devil the benefit of the law “for my own safety’s sake.” There’s a profound conservative truth in this, a warning that even passion for righteousness can be turned to evil, precisely because it is passion.

The popularity of vigorous rage merchants like Beck and Olbermann are not a sign of our political culture’s vitality, but rather its decadence. We live in a time and place that puts high value on emotion, and that views emotions as self-validating. To feel something is thought by many to be sufficient evidence of its truthfulness, or at least its authenticity. This is a mark of the barbarian. I understand why post-Sixties liberals make the mistake of believing that nonsense. But conservatives?

I love my own Fox Geezers, who are big-hearted, salt-of-the-earth folks when they’re not talking about politics. But they are living proof that growing older doesn’t always mean growing wiser.

 

Richmond Ramsey is the pseudonym of an executive who lives and works in Blue America.


 
 

 *****************************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5750 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Mon Feb 21, 2011 2:56 pm
Subject: Agent Orange “soaked” Ontario teens.....also Taylor County, FL.
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
Agent Orange also soaked Taylor County, FL.  In the 50's and 60's, Buckeye/P&G sprayed toxic herbicides including the infamous chemical mixture known as Agent Orange on the San Pedro Bay.   In later years, the mill has spread toxic sludge containing dioxins from the pulp-making process over much of the Bay.
The Bay happens to be the water-recharge area for this part of North Florida. 
Joy
 
Thu Feb 17 2011

Toronto Star

Agent Orange “soaked” Ontario teens

by Diana Zlomislic Staff Reporter

Cancer-causing toxins used to strip the jungles of Vietnam were also employed to clear massive plots of Crown land in Northern Ontario, government documents obtained by the Toronto Star reveal.

Records from the 1950s, 60s and 70s show forestry workers, often students and junior rangers, spent weeks at a time as human markers holding red, helium-filled balloons on fishing lines while low-flying planes sprayed toxic herbicides including an infamous chemical mixture known as Agent Orange on the brush and the boys below.

“We were saturated in chemicals,” said Don Romanowich, 63, a former supervisor of an aerial spraying program in Kapuskasing, Ont., who was recently diagnosed with a slow-growing cancer that can be caused by herbicide exposure. “We were told not to drink the stuff but we had no idea.”

A Star investigation examined hundreds of boxes of forestry documents and found the provincial government began experimenting with a powerful hormone-based chemical called 2,4,5-T — the dioxin-laced component of Agent Orange — in Hearst, Ont., in 1957.

The documents, filed at the Archives of Ontario, describe how WWII-era Stearman biplanes were kitted with 140-gallon tanks containing the chemicals, which were usually diluted in a mix of fuel oil and water.

Less than 10 years later, the Department of Lands and Forests (now the Ministry of Natural Resources) authorized the use of a more potent mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T for aerial spraying. The combination of those two herbicides in equal parts comprised Agent Orange — the most widely used chemical in the Vietnam War.

Over the years, spraying was done by both the province and timber companies. Hundreds of forestry workers were involved, but the documents do not give an exact number.

After the Star presented its findings to the natural resources ministry — including copies of the government’s own records and research based on interviews with ailing forestry workers now scattered across Canada — a spokesperson said the government is investigating and has notified Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health.

“We can acknowledge that a mixture of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T under various brand names were used in Ontario,” ministry spokesman Greg MacNeil wrote the Star in an email. Though he confirmed the use of a mixture known commonly as Agent Orange, MacNeil said the government never used a “product” called “Agent Orange.”

Dr. Wayne Dwernychuk, a world-renowned expert on Agent Orange, said the government is “throwing up a smokescreen.”

“There was no categorical brand called Agent Orange,” said Dwernychuk, who for more than 15 years conducted extensive research on the impact of toxic defoliants in Vietnam. “There was nothing coming out of any of the chemical companies in a barrel that had Agent Orange written on it. That’s laughable.

“If it’s got 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D as a mixture, it’s Agent Orange and it has dioxin — I guarantee it,” said Dwernychuk, who recently retired as chief scientist from Vancouver-based Hatfield Consultants.

Medical studies have determined the type of dioxin found in Agent Orange latches on to fat cells and can remain in the body for decades. Exposure may lead to skin disorders, liver problems, certain types of cancers and impaired immune, endocrine and reproductive functions.

Agent Orange may have been employed earlier than 1964 in Northern Ontario but the Star was told access to additional records is guarded by privacy legislation. The ministry said it does not have centralized spraying records prior to 1977 and suggested the newspaper “follow the procedures set up in the freedom of information act” to get a “complete picture of the data.”

The Star’s investigation exposes the first widespread use of these chemicals in Canada outside of a military spraying operation.

The Ministry of Natural Resources said it is working with the ministries of Health, Labour and Environment “to ensure this matter is thoroughly investigated and that worker health and safety is protected.”

The only other case on record of Agent Orange and other toxic defoliants being used en masse in Canada occurred in New Brunswick.

The U.S. military tested defoliants including Agent Orange at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in 1966 and 1967, according to a federal government inquiry that occurred 40 years later.

As of Dec. 22, 2010, the Canadian government has issued 3,137, $20,000 tax-free, compensation payments to people who lived or worked at CFB Gagetown during the years when spraying occurred and were diagnosed with of one of 12 medical conditions associated with exposure as identified by the Institute of Medicine. The federal government expects to approve thousands of additional applications for compensation before the June 30 deadline.

The U.S. military began spraying “hormone herbicides” like Agent Orange in South Vietnam in 1961.

Agent Orange was one of a rainbow of poisonous warfare chemicals that got its name from a band of colour painted on the barrels it was shipped in. The mixture itself was colourless.

“The U.S. military called it orange herbicide,” Dwernychuk said. “It was the American press that labelled it ‘Agent Orange’ because it was more sexy.”

The mixture ate through vast swaths of jungle, exposing Viet Cong strongholds.

Nearly 20,000 kilometres away in Northern Ontario, toxic herbicides were employed to disable a different kind of enemy.

The chemicals targeted what forestry reports described as “weed trees” — including birch, maple, poplar and shrubs — which stole sunlight and soil nutrients from young, profitable spruce species. The hormones in the defoliants caused the broad leaves on these weed trees to grow so quickly they starved to death.

In 1956, with the government’s blessing, Spruce Falls Power and Paper Company in Kapuskasing pioneered the aerial spraying of herbicides in Northern Ontario. The New York Times, which co-owned Spruce Falls with Kimberly-Clark and the Washington Star, printed its Sunday edition on black spruce, renowned for its tough fibres. (Tembec, a company that purchased Spruce Falls in 1991, did not respond to interview requests).

Aerial spraying programs were considered a cheap, fast and effective way to alter the landscape of Ontario’s forests for maximum profit. Timber companies and the government worked together to increase the output of money-making trees like white and black spruce while culling nearly everything else that got in their way.

In the mid-1960s, Spruce Falls held about 4 million acres of forest land under lease from the Ontario government and owned an additional 180,000 acres. The incomplete documents don’t provide a total number of acres sprayed.

After a bone marrow test confirmed he had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Romanowich, who worked for Spruce Falls during the 1960s and 1970s, said his first thought was to track down former colleagues.

“My oncologist asked me about heavy exposure to herbicides before I mentioned my work at Spruce Falls,” said the retired maintenance manager who lives in the Niagara region. “There is no absolute confirmation of this type of exposure being the cause but a very strong correlation that should be taken seriously. I am fortunate in that I will now be monitored on a regular basis with CAT scans and blood tests to watch for the inevitable flare-ups that can be treated with chemotherapy.”

He wants others who worked on these spraying programs to have the same chance to receive thorough medical exams based on their exposure.

He contacted the Ministry of Natural Resources in October with no response until late last month, nearly four weeks after the Star began its own investigation.

The government records list the names of five supervisors who worked on spraying programs in Northern Ontario during the 1950s and 1960s. Four of the five have either been diagnosed with or died of cancer. Their job included mixing chemicals and standing in the fields supervising spray campaigns. Teenaged workers are also listed in the records and the Star is working to track them down.

One of them on the list, David Buchanan always wondered what was inside the 45-gallon oil drums he worked with as a 15-year-old at Spruce Falls Power and Paper Company in 1964.

“Even then, it didn’t seem right,” said Buchanan, now a 52-year-old dentist in Sackville, N.S., who has suffered from a series of illnesses doctors couldn’t diagnose. Body-covering hives. Persistent bouts of dizziness. A sperm count so low he couldn’t have children.

“I have had every test known to mankind,” he said.

“I often wondered if some of my symptoms were related to something that happened in my childhood.”

His job as a summer student was to hand-pump vats of brush-and-tree- killing chemicals into the airplane sprayer.

“We got soaked,” Buchanan said. “I can’t remember what we did with our clothes but we stayed in the bush camp during spraying for weeks on end.” He does recall wearing a black rubber apron, brown rubber gloves and rubber boots while mixing and pumping the chemicals.

One document from 1962 recommended keeping an extra supply of rubber balloons handy because “the balloons do deteriorate from the spray mixture.”

As a college student, Paul Fawcett, now 62, also worked on Spruce Falls’ aerial spraying program. He was a 21-year-old “balloon man” during the summer of 1969. His father Don worked for the ministry as a district forester in Kapuskasing.

There was no uniform, Fawcett said, just jeans and a shirt — usually long-sleeves because of mosquitoes and flies. He recalls being covered in a fine mist or droplets from the spray plane.

“It was a lot of fun,” he said. “We would walk from station to station with red helium-filled balloons on fishing lines and the planes would swoop down.”

He recalled researchers from University of Toronto dropping in on his camp to survey how much spray was getting to the ground.

“They had us lay down ridged, filter papers on the ground or brush while the plane sprayed. We laid them down in a row covering four or five feet.”

Fawcett, now a welder in Hamilton, said he never heard about the results of that study.

Government forestry documents refer to extensive studies that were being conducted on spraying programs at a research facility in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., but these reports are either missing or misfiled.

Fawcett, whose doctor recently ordered an ultrasound to look into bladder problems, said he had no idea he was working with anything toxic. Aside from the bladder issues, Fawcett said he feels fine.

“It did a good job — what we wanted it to do,” said Clifford Emblin, a former government forestry manager who oversaw chemical spraying programs. “They were using those chemicals in Vietnam, too, for defoliation. Yeah, it was the same stuff. I don’t think anybody knew about the long-term effects.”

The U.S. military stopped using Agent Orange in 1970 after a study for the National Institutes of Health showed that the dioxin-tainted 2,4,5-T caused birth defects in laboratory animals. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs now recognizes more than 50 diseases and medical conditions associated with exposure.

Emblin, a former district manager for the Hearst and Hornepayne areas during the 1960s, recalled one of his forestry employees throwing a fit after his truck got caught directly beneath a spray plane’s flight line.

“The truck got sprayed and the paint came off the truck,” Emblin said, chuckling.

Emblin said his ministry didn’t know it was using Agent Orange until “four or five years after we quit using it, I guess, in the 70s.

“We had five sawmills that were depending on the growth of the (spruce) forest in Hearst to make a living,” he said. “That’s why we were doing it. We managed the land and they paid.”

Romanowich has been diagnosed with a type of cancer common in people exposed to harmful herbicides.
Glenn Lowson/TORONTO STAR

Diana Zlomislic can be reached by email at dzlomislic@thestar. ca or by phone at 416-869-4472

http://www.thestar. com/news/ canada/article/ 940243--star- exclusive- agent-orange- soaked-ontario- teens?bn= 1


 *******************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5751 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Subject: Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology

Posted by Robert Rapier on Monday, February 21, 2011
 
 
Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology

Doing Due Diligence

To people who follow the energy industry closely, it’s a common occurrence to come across announcements from companies proclaiming to have developed the key to the ‘next big thing’ — for solving the world’s energy crisis. Maybe they say they can take any sort of waste biomass and turn it into fuel — ethanol, diesel, pyrolysis oil, mixed alcohols — at very low cost. Or they say they can produce renewable electricity at a price competitive with coal.

The layperson reads the news release and is curious: “Is this real?”

When I am asked to comment on a press release, I try to be cautious with my opinions until I have peeled the onion a bit. There are technologies with real potential, and just because a company hypes their technology doesn’t mean it won’t work. So my opinion on technologies that I haven’t particularly studied will tend to be general and conservative.

But let’s say you are interested in becoming a stakeholder in the process. You could be a private investor, a government entity, or you could be someone from the media who is interested in sorting out hype from reality in order to protect potential stakeholders (such as taxpayers). That requires quite a different level of investigation than rendering an opinion based on a press release, and many people don’t know where to start.

In my own experience, perhaps 90% of the stories you see promoting various technologies are at least exaggerated. So how do you separate fact from fiction and wishful thinking from reality?

Understand the Levels of Scale and the Hurdles that Come With Each Step

It is a huge challenge to take results that were achieved in a laboratory and scale those up through a pilot facility to a demonstration facility to a commercial facility. Each of those steps is a gate, and each of those gates will stop most technologies from advancing through the gate. Skipping steps — for instance jumping from the lab to a demonstration size facility — greatly lowers the probability of success while putting much more money at risk.

There are no hard and fast rules on the borders between these particular facilities; one person’s pilot facility may be another person’s demonstration facility. In general, I think of lab experiments as consisting of one aspect of a technology at scales of ounces or milliliters. Piloting moves up into scales of pounds or liters per day, and will incorporate more pieces of the puzzle into the experiments. Demonstration facilities reach the realm of barrels per day (1 barrel = 42 gallons), and are typically integrated facilities designed to demonstrate that all aspects of the technology work — in conjunction with each other — at that particular scale.

A facility producing 10 barrels a day (150,000 gallons per year) is demonstration size; one that produces 1,000 barrels a day is on the low end of commercial size. To put those numbers into perspective, the average size of a corn ethanol plant is just over 4,000 barrels per day and the average size of an oil refinery in the U.S. is 125,000 barrels per day.

Data Omitted From the Press Release: How and Who to Get it From

Before you even get to ask questions, you may be asked to sign a secrecy agreement. This is a legitimate and necessary step for companies who wish to protect against someone running off with their technology and starting a competing company, or leaking proprietary information to competitors. A secrecy agreement will give you access to information you might never obtain otherwise, and you will often find out very quickly that what companies tell you privately is different from their press releases. On the other hand many companies that are out promoting their technology and trying to get funds will answer many questions before asking for a secrecy agreement — and ideally you want to learn as much as you can before signing an agreement.

Of course if you are a reporter doing an investigative story, you will never sign a secrecy agreement. You are just going to have to dig a little harder to find answers to your questions. In my case, I fall into both categories. I sign secrecy agreements with companies whose technology we may be interested in developing. I do not write about those companies. The technologies I do write on are based on information I have been able to glean through some of the methods I detail below.

As you dig for information, generally the first people you will encounter are those promoting the technology. They will probably be careful and very optimistic with the information they provide. What you really want to do is ultimately talk to an operator or technician who is involved in the day-to-day operation of the process. They will be the ones to tell you about potentially significant issues.

First Questions

The first question to ask is “At what scale has this process been demonstrated?” But that’s just a start, because you will get misleading answers and people will withhold information. They may not tell you that they only simulated some parts of the process. For instance, a biomass gasifier produces synthesis gas (syngas), but there can be problems with the gas quality because of tar formation. If a simulated syngas is used in lab or piloting experiments (e.g., bottled hydrogen and carbon monoxide were mixed together to produce the syngas), that tar issue can be conveniently ignored in the lab and yet be a show-stopper for a commercial plant.

So you have to dig into the details. You want to know the scale of the process that has been demonstrated, but then you also want to know how many consecutive hours it has been run, and you want to know the source of the raw materials and the composition of the final product. Ask about the nature of byproducts and waste products as well. Product quality and waste disposal are both issues that have bankrupted companies attempting to commercialize a process.

Know the Limits of Computer Modeling

Next you have to ask about the assumptions that they are using to model a commercial plant. What is the scale-up factor between what they actually demonstrated and what a commercial plant will be? What are the production volumes in each case? How were the costs estimated for construction of a commercial plant? Have they attempted to skip steps in the scale-up process (e.g., going from lab or small pilot to small commercial scale)? If they are running at lab or small pilot scale and projecting their production costs for a commercial plant, I generally never take those number seriously. There are just too many hurdles between the lab and commercial scale. Small lab scale problems often become much bigger problems at demonstration scale.

You want to clearly distinguish between how much of the process has actually been proven and how much has been simulated with computer models. I saw a recent question posed by a renewable energy developer: Isn’t it true that you can prove a technology through modeling? The answer to that question is ABSOLUTELY NOT! In fact, the reverse is true: You prove a model by actually demonstrating that the process gives results consistent with the model. But some people will present model results as if they represent reality. Models are merely guides; a model won’t tell you whether a process will work or not. It will give you some guidance, but ultimately you have to take the results from the model and actually run the process. That is how you prove a technology (and validate a computer model).

Biomass Feedstock, Economic Assumptions, and Energy Requirements

You need to ask about the presumed source and cost of the biomass that will be used. As I identified in Bad Assumptions, I believe the assumption of a long-term supply of cheap, free, or even negatively-priced biomass is one of the most unrealistic assumptions companies make, and yet the assumption that commonly results in those claims of $1 or $2/gallon biofuel.

So I want to know what the economics look like if the biomass costs are similar to the cost of hay. I want them to tell me about their costs if the biomass is $100 per ton (and I expect elusive or misleading answers). It is true that there is a lot of wood in the U.S. that has been killed by the pine bark beetle, but it still costs money to process those trees and move them to a facility for conversion into fuel.

The energy requirement for the process is a very important issue, but one that is not generally easy to dissect. But you want to know the types of energy used in the process, as well as the energy balance for the process (the energy of the fuel out over the energy it took to produce it). People will omit all sorts of energy inputs when stating an energy balance. The will assume that they will burn waste biomass in the commercial plant and thus assume low external energy inputs. They won’t count the energy that it takes to grow and transport biomass, and they won’t count the energy inputs to move the fuel to the customer. When you see someone claim an energy return of five or ten to one for a renewable process, those are often the kinds of assumptions they are making. (While it is true that the the economics of using coal as a primary energy input for making fuels may be attractive, such a process can’t rightly be labeled renewable).

Competitors and Former Employees Can Be a Source of Valuable Info

I also want to know about predecessors and competitors. Very little is invented from scratch; almost everyone builds off of previous work. So who came before and did similar work? Who is doing similar work now? How is their work better than that of others? Then you ask the same questions of competitors. This is a very effective tool for sniffing out problems. Competitors are always happy to tell you what is wrong with the other company’s process. On the other hand, many will insist that they are so unique they have no competitors. Don’t fall for that.

Talk to former employees. If there are skeletons in the closet, they may tell you where to look (especially if they are disgruntled). The difficulty here is that they may not be willing to go on the record, but they can provide leads. For instance, an employee will likely be bound by a confidentiality agreement, but that doesn’t prevent them from pointing you to a specific bit of information in a patent that doesn’t mesh with the company’s public claims.

Bring up the company in casual conversation and see where it leads. I did this on a recent trip, where a manager relayed to me that many years ago he had worked for a company that was claiming a breakthrough in turning natural gas to gasoline. I mentioned this process, and he said “Yes, it works but the gasoline has a very high aromatic content.” That was the first time I heard that particular revelation, and yet many countries have very low aromatic allowances for their gasoline. Hence, this was a potential show-stopper, or in any case a good bit of information to have as I continued to investigate the company.

Read Between the Lines and Use Common Sense

Claims like “Ideally suited for landfill waste” sometimes mean “Our economics only work if we are getting paid to take the biomass.” A statement like “Perfect for co-locating with a power plant” can mean “We need cheap steam.”

There will often be specific technical claims that may be outside of your particular area of expertise. For instance, someone claims to be able to run a car on water. You may not have the technical foundation to understand why this isn’t what it claims to be, but you can find lots of information on the Internet that breaks the technical issues down. You can also consult with someone who knows the area. Sometimes you can locate a free opinion. You may see a quote from a professor who is skeptical of the process. Contact them for further information.

Beyond the technical questions, there are the obvious signs. Do the company’s claims appear to be grandiose? If yes, this is a warning sign. Most companies making grandiose claims do not deliver. Do they issue press releases for fairly trivial developments? For instance, I saw a recent press release from a company claiming that a university had validated their (seemingly inflated) claims. Yet there was no actual detailing of which claims were being validated, nor exactly what the results of the university study were. It was a press release designed to draw attention without actually conveying any useful information.

Summary

To break this down into a short “cheat sheet”, here is a summary of some important questions that you want to ask. Try to corroborate answers by talking to employees or competitors.

  1. At what scale has the process been actually demonstrated?
  2. Is the process currently running?
  3. What is the source of raw materials for the process?
  4. What is being done with the product?
  5. What are the primary energy inputs into the process, and what is the energy balance?
  6. Will there be intermediate scale-up steps before a commercial facility is built?
  7. What are the key assumptions for a commercial facility (e.g., size, cost of production, location)?
  8. What is the presumed source and cost of biomass for a commercial facility?
  9. Has the technology been proven on that specific biomass?
  10. What prior work is most similar to yours, and who are your perceived competitors?

If you manage to get honest answers to those questions, you will be well on your way to burrowing through the hype to understand the true potential of a process.

 

 

Jana Chicoine
21 February, 2011, 7:21 am

I suggest adding two more questions: “Are there regulatory uncertainties or roadblocks?” and, “Is this commercially viable without fickle subsidies?”

 
 

 **************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5752 From: FINDJohnJ@...
Date: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:21 pm
Subject: Everything Is Connected - John Jackson's Email
FINDJohnJ@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED!
 
Report #1:     Poetry                       
Report #2:     Congregational Life
Report #3:     Every Day Is Earth Day
Report #3:     Here’s To Your Health
Report #4:     Floridians, How Do You Like Your Government Now?
Report #5:     Laughter Is The Best Medicine
 
* * * * * * * * *
 CREATION’S COVENANT
 
Not content with perfecting the orchid, no
God insists on a world awash
in daisies and dandelions.
 
Not satisfied with a simple sparrow
God imagines eagles, ostriches and swans
then throws in a penguin or two
just for fun.
 
God continues to create a universe of miracles
for us to discover, savor and enjoy
where a single blade of grass
or grain of sand
contains the secrets of the stars
and a century for the tortoise
or a single day for the gnat
is time enough.
 
Listen to the symphony of languages
while gazing at our human family
through kaleidoscope eyes.
 
See reflected in a million different faces
this sublime truth:
not all rainbows arch the skies.
 
J. R. Veneroso, MM
Maryknoll
 
 
* * * * * * * * * *
Not everything that can be counted, counts. And not everything that counts can be counted.                           Einstein
 
.* * * * * * * * *
 
CALL TO WORSHIP
 
THE CALL
 
One:            Anxious, passionate, overwhelmed, determined;
All:            We come seeking hope and wholeness.
One:            Angry, diligent, savvy, enmeshed;
All:            We come seeking hope and wholeness.
One:            Musical, cynical, practical, and faithful;
All:            We come seeking hope and wholeness.
 
One:            Out of an anxious world, we come
All:            God of peace, meet us here.
One:            Out of a violent world, we come
All:            God of peace, meet us here.
One:            Out of a chaotic world, we come
All:            God of peace, meet us here.
 
 
* * * * * * * * *
Winter is the time for comfort, for good food and warmth, for the touch of a friendly hand and for a talk beside the fire:  it is the time for home.  ~Edith Sitwell
* * * * * * * * *
GLOBAL WARMING DENIERS ARE FULL OF
HOT AIR
 
Every day, on the airwaves, online and throughout the media echo chamber, the loudest, most misinformed global warming deniers spout their opinions and beliefs.  But there is no believing or not believing in climate change – it is a matter of knowing the facts.
 
“When I talk to people who believe in this global warming crap … it’s fake science.  They may have educations and degrees that say they are scientists, but they’re not.  They’re political hacks and leftists.”                               Rush Limbaugh, The Rush Limbaugh Show, December 11, 2009
 
UCS Factcheck:  The overwhelming consensus of more than 1,250 authors and 2,000 scientific expert reviewers from the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as well as 18 American scientific associations, is that global warming is observably happening and a growing threat to our world.
 
“While we recognize the occurrence of these natural, cyclical environmental trends, we can’t say with assurance  that man’s activities cause weather changes.”                       
                  Sarah Palin, Washington Post, op ed, December 9, 2009
 
UCS Factcheck: The long-term global average temperature is rising too rapidly to be attributed to any natural cycles.  But Palin is right that we can’t say man’s activities cause weather changes because there is a significant scientific difference between short-term weather patterns and long-term climate change – and climate change is real.
 
“Global warming is a crock … and a huge cover up.  [2009] is the ninth coldest year on record that we have chronicled.”                        Sean Hannity, The Sean Hannity Show, December 1, 2009
 
USC Factcheck: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, among others, report the scientific fact that 2009 was actually one of the warmest years on record.
 
“In September of 2007, there was a 25 percent reduction in the usual minimum  [Arctic] ice cover … In the two years since, nearly all of the ice has returned.
                                                                              Glenn Beck, Glenn Beck, December 15, 2009
 
USC Factcheck: In 2007, the National Snow and Ice Data Center reported Arctic sea ice to be 39 percent below the long term average for September, when the area of ice is lowest each year.  In September 2009, the ice was again low – 24 percent below the long-term average.
 
You can check the facts on claims you hear from global warming deniers, oil, gas and coal industry lobbyists, and politicians on a wide range of issues through our online Fact Checker updates at: www.ucsusa.org/factchecker
Union of Concern Scientists
  
* * * * * * *
In youth we run into difficulties. In old age difficulties run into us.
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
DUKE ENERGY’S DEAL FOR RIVAL WOULD CREATE LARGEST UTILITY COMPANY
 
 
Duke Energy, a power company based in North Carolina, said on Monday that it had agreed to acquire a rival, Progress Energy, in an all-stock deal valued at $13.7 billion, creating the nation’s largest utility company.  The combined company would have $22.7 billion in annual revenue and more than seven million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio…
 
In 2007, Duke applied for permission to build a nuclear plant with two reactors in Cherokee County, S.C., called William States Lee III.  Progress Energy has proposed building two reactors adjacent to its operations near Raleigh, N.C. and two more at a new site in Levy County, Fl.
 
But the companies have yet to make any real progress on the projects.  None of the three projects are in line for government loan guarantees soon, and in the current economic environment, none are a sure thing.
 
One reason is the cost of the projects relative to the companies’ balance sheets.  Duke has estimated the cost of the Lee plant at $22 billion.
By Michael J. de la Merced
And Matthew L. Walk
The New York Times
 
(Note JJ: Those of us in Florida are already paying $12 per month on our electric utility bills to Progress Energy – for some future nuclear plant.  If they do not build, they do not have to return our money.  That is a sweet deal for them.)
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
Cross country skiing is great if you live in a small country.
* * * * * * * * * * *
MANY GET ANTIDEPRESSANTS WITHOUT PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS
 
More than a quarter of Americans taking antidepressants have never been diagnosed with any of the conditions the drugs are typically used to treat, according to new research.
 
That means millions could be exposed to side effects from the medicines without proven health benefits, researchers say.
 
“We cannot be sure that the risks and side effects of antidepressants are worth the benefit of taking them for people who do not meet criteria for major depression,” said Jina Pagura, a psychologist and medical student at the University of Manitoba in Canada who worked on the study.
 
The researchers tapped into the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiologic Surveys, which include a nationally representative sample of more than 20,000 U.S. adults interviewed between 2001 and 2003. 
 
Roughly one in 10 people reported taking antidepressants.  Yet a quarter of them had never been diagnosed with the conditions that doctors usually treat with the medication such as major depression and anxiety disorder.
Orlando Sentinel
Feb. 7, 2011
* * * * * * * * * * *
I never said most of the things I said.
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
GOP PLAN MORE ABOUT POLITICS THAN ECONOMICS
 
WASHINGTON
EUGENE ROBINSON
Washington Post Writers Group
 
Despite what you might have heard, the coming battle on Capitol Hill is not really about “government spending” in the abstract.
 
It’s about two radically different visions of how money should be spent.
 
Republicans who feign attacks of the vapors and fainting spells over the big, scary deficit would be more convincing if they didn’t begin with the insane premise that defense spending should be sacrosanct.  The House leadership in the post few days has begun to signal retreat from this indefensible position, but it’s unclear how much of the hyper-conservative GOP majority will follow.
 
Majority Leader Eric Cantor said Sunday that “every dollar should be on the table” – meaning that the Pentagon, which consumes nearly one-fourth of the entire federal budget, should be open to scrutiny as well.  But this is a departure from last year’s Republican campaign pledge to solve the nation’s budget woes by cutting “discretionary” spending only, leaving intact the defense spending needed to “keep American strong.”
 
The Republican “Pledge to America” promised to cut “at least $100 billion in the first year alone,” notwithstanding “exceptions for seniors, veterans and our troops.”  This was never a serious proposal, given that defense, entitlements and other mandatory spending consume about four-fifths of the budget.  But it was a nice round number that sounded good.
 
Apparently it was music to the ears of some of the small-government Republicans – perhaps they should be called no-government Republicans – in the House majority, because they are pressing the leadership to make good on this reckless promise.  According to The Washington Post, affected agencies would suffer a 30 percent cut in funding over the next seven months.
 
Do Americans really want the effectiveness of, say, food safety inspection to be eroded by 30 percent? What about air traffic control?  I didn’t think so.
 
This would be just the beginning, however; if the Republican Study Committee – a conservative bloc that includes most House Republicans – were to have its way.  This group proposes even deeper cuts, with nondefense agencies having to reduce spending by more than 40 percent over the next decade.  They call their proposal the Spending Reduction Act, but if we weren’t in a new era of polite discourse, I’d call it the Pro-Salmonella act…
 
The study committee’s Spending Reduction Act doesn’t give an inch on Pentagon spending, even though Defense Secretary Robert Gates, of all people, is advocating $78 billion in cuts.  But the conservative plan does propose eliminating a long list of specific subsidies and programs –
and the list is about politics, not economics.
 
The conservatives want to end funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, the Legal Services Corporation, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Energy Star program, the United Nations’ intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  You get the picture.  Put together, these expenditures would not begin to pay for, say, the $13 billion Marine Corps landing craft that Gates plans to kill because we are no longer fighting World War II…
 
In other words, it’s perfectly fine to waste money on defense.  What’s not acceptable to GOP conservatives, apparently, is spending on agencies or programs that they oppose philosophically.  Don’t believe in climate change, despite wide scientific consensus that it’s real?  Just cot off funding for the U.N. panel that disagrees with your view.
 
It seems to have dawned on Cantor that this position is fundamentally untenable and politically unwise.  He has his work cut out for him if much of the GOP caucus sees the budget as an expression not of policy but of vengeance and spite.
 
Orlando Sentinel
January 27, 2011
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
I haven't spoken to my wife in years. I didn't want to interrupt her.
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
POLITICALLY CORRECT
 
How to speak about women and be politically correct:
 
1. She is not a “babe” or a “chick” – she is a “breasted American.”
 
2. She is not a “dumb blonde” – she is a “light-haired detour off the information superhighway.”
 
3. She has not “been around” – she is a “previously-enjoyed companion.”
 
4. She does not “nag” – she becomes “verbally repetitive.”
 
How to speak about men and be politically correct:
 
1. He does not have a “beer gut” – he has developed a “liquid grain storage facility.”
 
2. He does not “get lost all the time” – he “investigates alternative destinations.”
 
3. He is not “balding” – he is in “follicle regression.”
 
 

#5753 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Tue Mar 1, 2011 5:33 pm
Subject: : Progress Florida Daily Clips 3-1-11
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 


From: "Jon Bleyer, Progress Florida" <info@...>
Subject: Progress Florida Daily Clips 3-1-11

Progress Florida Daily Clips

Support Daily Clips. Make A Contribution.


PROGRESS FLORIDA IN THE NEWS

The Fix's best state-based political Tweeters
By Chris Cillizza
Washington Post
Note: The Washington Post’s American politics reporter has named Progress Florida one of the “best state-based political Tweeters”. Follow us on Twitter at @ProgressFlorida.

Florida citizens gear up to "Awake the State" March 8th (audio story)
By Lisa Marzilli
WMNF Community Radio Tampa
Excerpt: Today on the Last Call we spoke with members of two organizations who are spearheading the Awake the State call to action scheduled for March 8, the opening day of the new legislative session. Mark Ferrulo is Executive Director of Progress Florida and Susannah Randolph heads the group Florida Watch Action.

Personhood Florida leader: Many opponents have ‘participated in taking their own child’s life’
By Virginia Chamlee
Florida Independent
Excerpt: Big-name pro-choice groups like Planned Parenthood and Progress Florida have come out harshly against the personhood initiative, calling it a product of “radical anti-choice extremists.”

FEATURED STORIES

Lawmakers take aim at unions
By Bill Cotterell
Florida Capital News
In a move that could bring Wisconsin-style protests to Florida, four Republican legislators are sponsoring bills that would effectively wipe out collective bargaining for government employees.

Gov. Rick Scott's Take on Education Reform is Textbook Jeb
By Cynthia Barnett
Florida Trend
Gov. Rick Scott sees the school calendar as arbitrary, Florida's classrooms as a throwback to five decades ago and choices such as home schooling quashed by bureaucratic barriers.

Budget cuts likey to kill Florida environmental programs; even Everglades restoration in danger
By William E. Gibson
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Eager to slash taxes and restrain government spending, Gov. Rick Scott and Republican budget-cutters in Congress are seeking to chop big chunks of state and federal funding for programs designed to preserve the natural environment.

Gov. Rick Scott goes to the White House and smiles
By Alex Leary
St. Petersburg Times
Gov. Rick Scott came face-to-face with his nemesis — President Barack Obama — and what did he do?

A step backward on civil rights
Editorial
St. Petersburg Times
Just as the Florida Legislature is advised that ex-felons should get more help re-entering society to reduce recidivism and prison populations, Attorney General Pam Bondi wants to make it harder for felons to get their civil rights restored.

FLORIDA POLITICS

Rick Scott and Florida Inc.
By Amy Keller
Florida Trend
Related: Interview with Florida's Gov. Rick Scott
The job of governor and that of chief executive officer of a corporation are very similar, says Bob Martinez, Florida's governor from 1987-91.

Florida may face showdown over early 2012 primary
By William March
Tampa Tribune
Florida may be headed for a showdown with the Republican Party and the early primary states over the date of its 2012 presidential primary.

For Senate president Haridopolos, a sweetheart book deal
By Fred Grimm
Miami Herald
Writers with less notable achievements than Florida Legislative History and Processes must have writhed in envy.

Smith finds few stars in Democratic skies
By Daniel Ruth
St. Petersburg Times
Consider that you are Rod Smith, the newly minted chairman of the Florida Democratic Party, an unenviable task somewhat akin to being given the reins managing the careers of Mel Gibson, Lindsay Lohan and Amy Winehouse.

Rick Kriseman Has Become the Face of Recall
By Ralph De La Cruz
Florida Center for Investigative Reporting
On Monday, I chatted with the man who, either willingly or unwillingly, has become the face of recall.

Enterprise Florida names new president at Scott's urging
By Michael C. Bender
St. Petersburg Times/Miami Herald Tallahassee Bureau
F. Gray Swoope Jr. of the Mississippi Development Authority was hired Monday as president of Enterprise Florida, the organization announced.

Gov. Rick Scott loses a reason to slow Amends 5, 6
By Marc Caputo
St. Petersburg Times
Three days after Rick Scott was sworn in as governor he set about slowing down the process by which the federal government would approve of two highly popular state constitutional amendments, 5 and 6, concerning the way lawmakers draw legislative and congressional districts.

Holocaust survivors to protest Sen. Nelson’s fundraiser
By Jay Weaver
Miami Herald
A group of Holocaust survivors, who once considered themselves friends of U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, will be protesting his Miami Beach fundraiser with President Barack Obama on Friday because they say the Florida Democrat has broken a promise to them.

Gov. Crist is Now Citizen Charlie
By Art Levy
Florida Trend
Attorney John Morgan has known Charlie Crist since the early 1990s, when Crist was a state senator and Morgan would visit Tallahassee to lobby legislators about tort reform.

POLITICAL RACES

Voting takes place Tuesday in Florida Senate race
By Patricia Mazzei
Miami Herald
Tuesday is Election Day in the contest to replace U.S. Rep. Frederica Wilson in the Florida Senate.

To win recall, Mayor Alvarez may need to appeal to new groups
By Patricia Mazzei
Miami Herald
When he was first elected mayor in 2004, Carlos Alvarez was the darling of suburban Hispanics who saw him as a reformer who would clean up corruption in Miami-Dade County.

Tampa voters go to the polls today
By Christian M. Wade
Tampa Tribune
Today, Tampa voters go to the polls to choose a new mayor and seven city council members from a crowded field of candidates.

ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY

EPA's new Florida rules roil D.C.
By Fred Hiers
Gainesville Sun
The fight over the federal Environmental Protection Agency's new water pollutant rules for Florida could soon be decided in Washington.

Poll: Voters don't like Scott's proposed cut to Everglades funding
By Michael C. Bender
St. Petersburg Times
The Everglades Foundation today released parts of their Terrance Group poll of 607 likely voters on Feb. 13-14.

Utility-backed renewable energy legislation returns in the Senate
By Travis Pillow
Florida Independent
State Sen. Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, has introduced a bill similar to a measure that passed the House last year but died in the Senate, which would have allowed private utilities to charge customers for renewable power.

Judge asked to dismiss oil spill claims
Associated Press
Tampa Tribune
BP and other companies sued over the massive Gulf oil spill are asking a federal judge to dismiss many of the claims filed by businesses and people who say they have been harmed by the disaster. 

EDUCATION

Lawmakers fast-track new teacher merit pay bill
By Leslie Postal
Orlando Sentinel
Florida's first attempt at a statewide teacher merit-pay law was torpedoed last year by a veto from then-Gov. Charlie Crist.

Teachers blast budget cuts
By Carmen Paige
Pensacola News Journal
Waving red flags, hundreds of teachers, educational support personnel and residents from Escambia and Santa Rosa counties vowed Monday night to fight off attacks on education.

Bright Futures scholarship program faces $100 million funding cut
By Scott Travis
South Florida Sun-Sentinel
Florida's popular Bright Futures scholarship program may suffer big cuts at the same time students are facing rapidly rising tuition at state universities.

JOBS, BUDGET, AND ECONOMY

Legislative analysts declare Florida's pension fund fiscally sound
By Mary Ellen Klas
Miami Herald
Florida's pension fund is "better funded, incurs lower investment fees and...investment returns are average" compared to other states, according to a new report from the Legislature's policy assessment arm, OPPAGA.

Gov. Rick Scott reaches too far to compare state pension problems with Social Security's
By Aaron Sharockman
St. Petersburg Times/Miami Herald PolitiFact
Give him credit: Though Florida Gov. Rick Scott wants to eliminate 10 percent of the state work force over two years, and make those who remain pay more toward their retirement and health care, the new governor is at least taking the time in his first few months in office to meet with state employees and answer their questions.

Pension reform: Does Florida law give police, firefighters excessive benefits?
By Jenna Buzzacco-Foerster and Aaron Hale
Naples Daily News
Local governments across the state have spent the better part of the past five years trying to balance their budgets without increasing taxes.

Florida gas prices rise 23 cents per gallon
By Anthony Cormier
Sarasota Herald-Tribune
It was not all that long ago that it cost Traci Furlow $25, at most, to fill up her Oldsmobile.

HEALTH AND SENIORS

Who advises Florida Gov. Rick Scott on health policy?
By Stacey Singer
Palm Beach Post
His name is Michael F. Cannon, and he’s an economist who works for the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank that was co-founded by Koch Industries’ scion Charles Koch in 1977.

State workers don’t see cuts coming
By Brittany Davis
Health News Florida
Gov. Rick Scott has proposed a deep cut in state workers' health benefits -- $7,000 a year for the most popular family plan -- but most state workers seem unaware of it.

Fasano camp to Scott on Drug Monitoring Program repeal: You got a better plan?
By Virginia Chamlee
Florida Independent
State Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, has grown increasingly vocal about his opposition to Gov. Rick Scott’s recommendation that the state legislature repeal Florida’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.

Buchanan, sheriffs push Scott for drug database
By Dale White
Sarasota Herald-Tribune
After hurting his back working out and getting prescription painkillers from an acquaintance, Tyler Quigley battled addiction until it contributed to his death at age 19.

Obama admin defends health care reform in court
By Larry O’Dell
Associated Press
President Barack Obama's administration said in court papers Monday that a federal judge in Virginia erred in striking down the centerpiece of its health care reform law.

CIVIL RIGHTS, PEACE AND SOCIAL ISSUES

Suit alleges former Dozier school abused three boys
Ben Montgomery
St. Petersburg Times
They changed the name, pushed out the superintendent, reduced the population of young prisoners, retrained the staff and fired employees caught sleeping on the job.

Alternative immigration ‘compacts’ crop up nationwide, and in Sarasota
By Marcos Restrepo
Florida Independent
Last week, as several immigration-enforcement bills made their way through state legislatures, alternative bills and state compacts were proposed to deal with problems related to immigration.

JUSTICE AND THE COURTS

State senator to cops: Clean up the way you do police lineups
By Rene Stutzman
Orlando Sentinel
State Sen. Joe Negron is on the Innocence Commission of Florida, a panel working to make sure more innocent people are not sent to prison, but the board is not moving fast enough or aggressively enough for him.

 

 

***********************************

Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  

 


#5754 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Tue Mar 1, 2011 5:43 pm
Subject: Pathological Profits Make for a Disposable Planet
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

Edge of the Future

Back to Opinion

Pathological Profits Make for a Disposable Planet

February 28th 2011

China Topics - Chinese woman masked

Some years ago in New England, a group of environmentalists asked a corporate executive how his company (a paper mill) could justify dumping its raw industrial effluent into a nearby river.  The river—which had taken Mother Nature centuries to create--was used for drinking water, fishing, boating, and swimming.  In just a few years, the paper mill had turned it into a highly toxic open sewer.

The executive shrugged and said that river dumping was the most cost-effective way of removing the mill’s wastes. If the company had to absorb the additional expense of having to clean up after itself, it might not be able to maintain its competitive edge and would then have to go out of business or move to a cheaper labor market, resulting in a loss of jobs for the local economy.

Free Market Über Alles

It was a familiar argument: the company had no choice. It was compelled to act that way in a competitive market. The mill was not in the business of protecting the environment but in the business of making a profit, the highest possible profit at the highest possible rate of return. Profit is the name of the game, as business leaders make clear when pressed on the point. The overriding purpose of business is capital accumulation.

To justify its single-minded profiteering, Corporate America promotes the classic laissez-faire theory which claims that the free  market---a congestion of  unregulated and unbridled enterprises all selfishly pursuing their own ends---is governed by a benign “invisible hand” that miraculously produces optimal outputs for everybody.

The free marketeers have a deep all-abiding faith in laissez-faire for it is a faith that serves them well. It means no government oversight, no being held accountable for the environmental disasters they perpetrate. Like greedy spoiled brats, they repeatedly get bailed out by the government (some free market!) so that they can continue to take irresponsible risks, plunder the land, poison the seas, sicken whole communities, lay waste to entire regions, and pocket obscene profits.

This corporate system of capital accumulation treats the Earth’s life-sustaining resources (arable land, groundwater, wetlands, foliage, forests, fisheries, ocean beds, bays, rivers, air quality) as disposable ingredients presumed to be of limitless supply, to be consumed or toxified at will. As BP has demonstrated so well in the Gulf-of-Mexico catastrophe, considerations of cost weigh so much more heavily than considerations of safety. As one Congressional inquiry concluded: “Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense.”

Indeed, the function of the transnational corporation is not to promote a healthy ecology but to extract as much marketable value out of the natural world as possible even if it means treating the environment like a septic tank. An ever-expanding corporate capitalism and a fragile finite ecology are on a calamitous collision course, so much so that the support systems of the entire ecosphere---the Earth’s thin skin of fresh air, water, and topsoil---are at risk.

 It is not true that the ruling politico-economic interests are in a state of denial about all this.  Far worse than denial, they have shown outright antagonism toward those who think our planet is more important than their profits.  So they defame environmentalists as “eco-terrorists,” “EPA gestapo,” “Earth day alarmists,” “tree huggers,” and purveyors of “Green hysteria.” 

In an enormous departure from free-market ideology, most of the diseconomies of big business are foisted upon the general populace, including the costs of cleaning up toxic wastes, the cost of monitoring production, the cost of disposing of industrial effluence (which composes 40 to 60 percent of the loads treated by taxpayer-supported municipal sewer plants), the cost of developing new water sources (while industry and agribusiness consume 80 percent of the nation’s daily water supply), and the costs of attending to the sickness and disease caused by all the toxicity created. With many of these diseconomies regularly passed on to the government, the private sector then boasts of its superior cost-efficiency over the public sector.

The Super-rich Are Different from Us

Isn’t ecological disaster a threat to the health and survival of corporate plutocrats just as it is to us ordinary citizens? We can understand why the corporate rich might want to destroy public housing, public education, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Such cutbacks would bring us closer to a free market society devoid of the publicly-funded “socialistic” human services that the ideological reactionaries detest. And such cuts would not deprive the superrich and their families of anything. The superrich have more than sufficient private wealth to procure whatever services and protections they need for themselves.

But the environment is a different story, is it not? Don’t wealthy reactionaries and their corporate lobbyists inhabit the same polluted planet as everyone else, eat the same chemicalized food, and breathe the same toxified air?  In fact, they do not live exactly as everyone else. They experience a different class reality, often residing in places where the air is markedly better than in low and middle income areas. They have access to food that is organically raised and specially transported and prepared.

The nation's toxic dumps and freeways usually are not situated in or near their swanky neighborhoods. In fact, the superrich do not live in neighborhoods as such. They usually reside on landed estates with plenty of wooded areas, streams, meadows, and only a few well-monitored access roads. Pesticide sprays are not poured over their trees and gardens. Clear cutting does not desolate their ranches, estates, family forests, lakes, and prime vacation spots.

Still, should they not fear the threat of an ecological apocalypse brought on by global warming? Do they want to see life on Earth, including their own lives, destroyed? In the long run they indeed will be sealing their own doom along with everyone else’s. However, like us all, they live not in the long run but in the here and now. What is now at stake for them is something more proximate and more urgent than global ecology; it is global profits. The fate of the biosphere seems like a remote abstraction compared to the fate of one’s immediate--and enormous--investments.    

With their eye on the bottom line, big business leaders know that every dollar a company spends on oddball things like environmental protection is one less dollar in earnings. Moving away from fossil fuels and toward solar, wind, and tidal energy could help avert ecological disaster, but six of the world's ten top industrial corporations are involved primarily in the production of oil, gasoline, and motor vehicles. Fossil fuel pollution brings billions of dollars in returns. Ecologically sustainable forms of production threaten to compromise such profits, the big producers are convinced.

Immediate gain for oneself is a far more compelling consideration than a future loss shared by the general public. Every time you drive your car, you are putting your immediate need to get somewhere ahead of the collective need to avoid poisoning the air we all breath. So with the big players: the social cost of turning a forest into a wasteland weighs little against the immense and immediate profit that comes from harvesting the timber and walking away with a neat bundle of cash. And it can always be rationalized away: there are lots of other forests for people to visit, they don’t need this one; society needs the timber; lumberjacks need the jobs, and so on.

The Future Is Now

Some of the very same scientists and environmentalists who see the ecology crisis as urgent rather annoyingly warn us of a catastrophic climate crisis by “the end of this century.” But that’s some ninety years away when all of us and most of our kids will be dead---which makes global warming a much less urgent issue.

There are other scientists who manage to be even more irritating by warning us of an impending ecological crisis then putting it even further into the future: “We’ll have to stop thinking in terms of eons and start thinking in terms of centuries,” one scientific sage was quoted in the New York Times in 2006. This is supposed to put us on alert? If a global catastrophe is a century or several centuries away, who is going to make the terribly difficult and costly decisions today whose effects will be felt far in the future?

Often we are told to think of our dear grandchildren who will be fully victimized by it all (an appeal usually made in a beseeching tone). But most of the young people I address on college campuses have a hard time imagining the world that their nonexistent grandchildren will be experiencing thirty or forty years hence.

Such appeals should be put to rest. We do not have centuries or generations or even many decades before disaster is upon us. Ecological crisis is not some distant urgency. Most of us alive today probably will not have the luxury of saying “Après moi, le déluge” because we will still be around to experience the catastrophe ourselves. We know this to be true because the ecological crisis is already acting upon us with an accelerated and compounded effect that may soon prove irreversible.

The Profiteering Madness

Sad to say, the environment cannot defend itself. It is up to us to protect it—or what’s left of it. But all the superrich want is to keep transforming living nature into commodities and commodities into dead capital. Impending ecological disasters are of no great moment to the corporate plunderers. Of living nature they have no measure.

Wealth becomes addictive. Fortune whets the appetite for still more fortune.  There is no end to the amount of money one might wish to accumulate, driven onward by the auri sacra fames, the cursed hunger for gold. So the money addicts grab more and more for themselves, more than can be spent in a thousand lifetimes of limitless indulgence, driven by what begins to resemble an obsessional pathology, a monomania that blots out every other human consideration.

They are more wedded to their wealth than to the Earth upon which they live, more concerned about the fate of their fortunes than the fate of humanity, so possessed by their pursuit of profit as to not see the disaster looming ahead. There was a New Yorker cartoon showing a corporate executive standing at a lectern addressing a business meeting with these words: “And so, while the end-of-the-world scenario will be rife with unimaginable horrors, we believe that the pre-end period will be filled with unprecedented opportunities for profit.”

Not such a joke. Years ago I remarked that those who denied the existence of global warming would not change their opinion until the North Pole itself started melting. (I never expected it to actually start dissolving  in my lifetime.) Today we are facing an Arctic meltdown that carries horrendous implications for the oceanic gulf streams, coastal water levels, the planet’s entire temperate zone, and world agricultural output.

So how are the captains of industry and finance responding?  As we might expect: like monomaniacal profiteers. They hear the music: ca-ching, ca-ching. First, the Arctic melting will open a direct northwest passage between the two great oceans, a dream older than Lewis and Clark. This will make for shorter and more accessible and inexpensive global trade routes. No more having to plod through the Panama Canal or around Cape Horn. Lower transportation costs means more trade and higher profits.

Second, they joyfully note that the melting is opening up vast new oil reserves to drilling. They will be able to drill-baby-drill for more of the same fossil fuel that is causing the very calamity descending upon us. More meltdown means more oil and more profits; such is the mantra of the free marketeers who think the world belongs only to them.

Imagine now that we are all inside one big bus hurtling down a road that is headed for a fatal plunge into a deep ravine. What are our profit addicts doing? They are hustling up and down the aisle, selling us crash cushions and seat belts at exorbitant prices. They planned ahead for this sales opportunity.

We have to get up from our seats, quickly place them under adult supervision, rush the front of the bus, yank the driver away, grab hold of the wheel, slow the bus down, and turn it around. Not easy but maybe still possible. With me it’s a recurrent dream.

 

 

Michael Parenti’s recent books include God and His Demons (Prometheus 2010), Contrary Notions: The Michael Parenti Reader (City Lights, 2007); and The Face of Imperialism (Paradigm, 2011). For more information, visit his website: www.michaelparenti.org

 
 

 
 
***************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5755 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Thu Mar 3, 2011 2:57 am
Subject: Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology

Posted by Robert Rapier on Monday, February 21, 2011
 
 
Due Diligence: How to Evaluate a Renewable Energy Technology

Doing Due Diligence

 

To people who follow the energy industry closely, it’s a common occurrence to come across announcements from companies proclaiming to have developed the key to the ‘next big thing’ — for solving the world’s energy crisis. Maybe they say they can take any sort of waste biomass and turn it into fuel — ethanol, diesel, pyrolysis oil, mixed alcohols — at very low cost. Or they say they can produce renewable electricity at a price competitive with coal.

The layperson reads the news release and is curious: “Is this real?”

When I am asked to comment on a press release, I try to be cautious with my opinions until I have peeled the onion a bit. There are technologies with real potential, and just because a company hypes their technology doesn’t mean it won’t work. So my opinion on technologies that I haven’t particularly studied will tend to be general and conservative.

But let’s say you are interested in becoming a stakeholder in the process. You could be a private investor, a government entity, or you could be someone from the media who is interested in sorting out hype from reality in order to protect potential stakeholders (such as taxpayers). That requires quite a different level of investigation than rendering an opinion based on a press release, and many people don’t know where to start.

In my own experience, perhaps 90% of the stories you see promoting various technologies are at least exaggerated. So how do you separate fact from fiction and wishful thinking from reality?

Understand the Levels of Scale and the Hurdles that Come With Each Step

It is a huge challenge to take results that were achieved in a laboratory and scale those up through a pilot facility to a demonstration facility to a commercial facility. Each of those steps is a gate, and each of those gates will stop most technologies from advancing through the gate. Skipping steps — for instance jumping from the lab to a demonstration size facility — greatly lowers the probability of success while putting much more money at risk.

There are no hard and fast rules on the borders between these particular facilities; one person’s pilot facility may be another person’s demonstration facility. In general, I think of lab experiments as consisting of one aspect of a technology at scales of ounces or milliliters. Piloting moves up into scales of pounds or liters per day, and will incorporate more pieces of the puzzle into the experiments. Demonstration facilities reach the realm of barrels per day (1 barrel = 42 gallons), and are typically integrated facilities designed to demonstrate that all aspects of the technology work — in conjunction with each other — at that particular scale.

A facility producing 10 barrels a day (150,000 gallons per year) is demonstration size; one that produces 1,000 barrels a day is on the low end of commercial size. To put those numbers into perspective, the average size of a corn ethanol plant is just over 4,000 barrels per day and the average size of an oil refinery in the U.S. is 125,000 barrels per day.

Data Omitted From the Press Release: How and Who to Get it From

Before you even get to ask questions, you may be asked to sign a secrecy agreement. This is a legitimate and necessary step for companies who wish to protect against someone running off with their technology and starting a competing company, or leaking proprietary information to competitors. A secrecy agreement will give you access to information you might never obtain otherwise, and you will often find out very quickly that what companies tell you privately is different from their press releases. On the other hand many companies that are out promoting their technology and trying to get funds will answer many questions before asking for a secrecy agreement — and ideally you want to learn as much as you can before signing an agreement.

Of course if you are a reporter doing an investigative story, you will never sign a secrecy agreement. You are just going to have to dig a little harder to find answers to your questions. In my case, I fall into both categories. I sign secrecy agreements with companies whose technology we may be interested in developing. I do not write about those companies. The technologies I do write on are based on information I have been able to glean through some of the methods I detail below.

As you dig for information, generally the first people you will encounter are those promoting the technology. They will probably be careful and very optimistic with the information they provide. What you really want to do is ultimately talk to an operator or technician who is involved in the day-to-day operation of the process. They will be the ones to tell you about potentially significant issues.

First Questions

The first question to ask is “At what scale has this process been demonstrated?” But that’s just a start, because you will get misleading answers and people will withhold information. They may not tell you that they only simulated some parts of the process. For instance, a biomass gasifier produces synthesis gas (syngas), but there can be problems with the gas quality because of tar formation. If a simulated syngas is used in lab or piloting experiments (e.g., bottled hydrogen and carbon monoxide were mixed together to produce the syngas), that tar issue can be conveniently ignored in the lab and yet be a show-stopper for a commercial plant.

So you have to dig into the details. You want to know the scale of the process that has been demonstrated, but then you also want to know how many consecutive hours it has been run, and you want to know the source of the raw materials and the composition of the final product. Ask about the nature of byproducts and waste products as well. Product quality and waste disposal are both issues that have bankrupted companies attempting to commercialize a process.

Know the Limits of Computer Modeling

Next you have to ask about the assumptions that they are using to model a commercial plant. What is the scale-up factor between what they actually demonstrated and what a commercial plant will be? What are the production volumes in each case? How were the costs estimated for construction of a commercial plant? Have they attempted to skip steps in the scale-up process (e.g., going from lab or small pilot to small commercial scale)? If they are running at lab or small pilot scale and projecting their production costs for a commercial plant, I generally never take those number seriously. There are just too many hurdles between the lab and commercial scale. Small lab scale problems often become much bigger problems at demonstration scale.

You want to clearly distinguish between how much of the process has actually been proven and how much has been simulated with computer models. I saw a recent question posed by a renewable energy developer: Isn’t it true that you can prove a technology through modeling? The answer to that question is ABSOLUTELY NOT! In fact, the reverse is true: You prove a model by actually demonstrating that the process gives results consistent with the model. But some people will present model results as if they represent reality. Models are merely guides; a model won’t tell you whether a process will work or not. It will give you some guidance, but ultimately you have to take the results from the model and actually run the process. That is how you prove a technology (and validate a computer model).

Biomass Feedstock, Economic Assumptions, and Energy Requirements

You need to ask about the presumed source and cost of the biomass that will be used. As I identified in Bad Assumptions, I believe the assumption of a long-term supply of cheap, free, or even negatively-priced biomass is one of the most unrealistic assumptions companies make, and yet the assumption that commonly results in those claims of $1 or $2/gallon biofuel.

So I want to know what the economics look like if the biomass costs are similar to the cost of hay. I want them to tell me about their costs if the biomass is $100 per ton (and I expect elusive or misleading answers). It is true that there is a lot of wood in the U.S. that has been killed by the pine bark beetle, but it still costs money to process those trees and move them to a facility for conversion into fuel.

The energy requirement for the process is a very important issue, but one that is not generally easy to dissect. But you want to know the types of energy used in the process, as well as the energy balance for the process (the energy of the fuel out over the energy it took to produce it). People will omit all sorts of energy inputs when stating an energy balance. The will assume that they will burn waste biomass in the commercial plant and thus assume low external energy inputs. They won’t count the energy that it takes to grow and transport biomass, and they won’t count the energy inputs to move the fuel to the customer. When you see someone claim an energy return of five or ten to one for a renewable process, those are often the kinds of assumptions they are making. (While it is true that the the economics of using coal as a primary energy input for making fuels may be attractive, such a process can’t rightly be labeled renewable).

Competitors and Former Employees Can Be a Source of Valuable Info

I also want to know about predecessors and competitors. Very little is invented from scratch; almost everyone builds off of previous work. So who came before and did similar work? Who is doing similar work now? How is their work better than that of others? Then you ask the same questions of competitors. This is a very effective tool for sniffing out problems. Competitors are always happy to tell you what is wrong with the other company’s process. On the other hand, many will insist that they are so unique they have no competitors. Don’t fall for that.

Talk to former employees. If there are skeletons in the closet, they may tell you where to look (especially if they are disgruntled). The difficulty here is that they may not be willing to go on the record, but they can provide leads. For instance, an employee will likely be bound by a confidentiality agreement, but that doesn’t prevent them from pointing you to a specific bit of information in a patent that doesn’t mesh with the company’s public claims.

Bring up the company in casual conversation and see where it leads. I did this on a recent trip, where a manager relayed to me that many years ago he had worked for a company that was claiming a breakthrough in turning natural gas to gasoline. I mentioned this process, and he said “Yes, it works but the gasoline has a very high aromatic content.” That was the first time I heard that particular revelation, and yet many countries have very low aromatic allowances for their gasoline. Hence, this was a potential show-stopper, or in any case a good bit of information to have as I continued to investigate the company.

Read Between the Lines and Use Common Sense

Claims like “Ideally suited for landfill waste” sometimes mean “Our economics only work if we are getting paid to take the biomass.” A statement like “Perfect for co-locating with a power plant” can mean “We need cheap steam.”

There will often be specific technical claims that may be outside of your particular area of expertise. For instance, someone claims to be able to run a car on water. You may not have the technical foundation to understand why this isn’t what it claims to be, but you can find lots of information on the Internet that breaks the technical issues down. You can also consult with someone who knows the area. Sometimes you can locate a free opinion. You may see a quote from a professor who is skeptical of the process. Contact them for further information.

Beyond the technical questions, there are the obvious signs. Do the company’s claims appear to be grandiose? If yes, this is a warning sign. Most companies making grandiose claims do not deliver. Do they issue press releases for fairly trivial developments? For instance, I saw a recent press release from a company claiming that a university had validated their (seemingly inflated) claims. Yet there was no actual detailing of which claims were being validated, nor exactly what the results of the university study were. It was a press release designed to draw attention without actually conveying any useful information.

Summary

To break this down into a short “cheat sheet”, here is a summary of some important questions that you want to ask. Try to corroborate answers by talking to employees or competitors.

  1. At what scale has the process been actually demonstrated?
  2. Is the process currently running?
  3. What is the source of raw materials for the process?
  4. What is being done with the product?
  5. What are the primary energy inputs into the process, and what is the energy balance?
  6. Will there be intermediate scale-up steps before a commercial facility is built?
  7. What are the key assumptions for a commercial facility (e.g., size, cost of production, location)?
  8. What is the presumed source and cost of biomass for a commercial facility?
  9. Has the technology been proven on that specific biomass?
  10. What prior work is most similar to yours, and who are your perceived competitors?

If you manage to get honest answers to those questions, you will be well on your way to burrowing through the hype to understand the true potential of a process.

 

 

Jana Chicoine
21 February, 2011, 7:21 am

I suggest adding two more questions: “Are there regulatory uncertainties or roadblocks?” and, “Is this commercially viable without fickle subsidies?”

 
 
http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2011/02/21/due-diligence-how-to-evaluate-a-renewable-energy-technology/

 **************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HopeForCleanWater/  
 http://grooups.yahoo.com/group/EANoF/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FloridiansAgainstIncineratorsInDisguise/  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SaveTaylorCountyFloridaResidents/
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

#5756 From: john hedrick <johnhedrick13@...>
Date: Thu Mar 3, 2011 6:06 am
Subject: Towards restoring citizen control over their governments in Florida...
johnhedrick13
Send Email Send Email
 

A version of this appeared in the Tampa Tribune today and trustfully will in many more locations. More soon enough, John

 

 

 

 

Towards restoring citizen control over their governments in Florida

 

By John Hedrick

Signs abound of citizen dissatisfaction with their local and state governments. Look at the recent Sunshine State poll. Almost half of Floridians say their state is worse off than 5 years ago.  65% say it will get worse or stay the same in the next 5 years.  And 21% are seriously considering leaving the state.  71% think their government leaders do the right thing only some of the time or never do the right thing, and only 23-33% of Floridians think their government does a good or excellent job. Yet we have elections every year, two years, or four years.  We've tried Term Limits for state politicians and some local governments, and we're about to try Fair Districts at the state level, but that's likely not enough either.

 

So what can bring government decisions back in line with people's needs and desires? Back in the early 1900s, when Americans faced similar concentrations of corporate and economic power, reformers managed to expose and remove political machines and bosses.  The parallel today is the division between the Insiders and the rest of us.

 

A century ago, reformers sought to enable the citizenry to rule more directly, and thus they developed political safeguards called  Initiative, Referendum and Recall.  These three safeguards of citizen control have since been adopted, in various models, in about 25 states, including Florida .  Yet existing safeguards have not gone far enough to give citizens a way to counteract undue money and insider control.  What is needed are the following Constitutional Amendment initiatives:

 

(1) A “Legislative Initiative” at the state level and then, similarly, “Legislative Initiative” for all local governments.  Only in this way can citizen voices be truly heard:  citizens can petition and put an proposed law on the ballot, for their fellow citizens to decide.


We have “Constitutional Initiative” currently at the state level, which is very difficult to utilize, with its high percentage requirement of petition signatures and its 60% passage threshold.  This “Constitutional Initiative” also results in measures such as Class Sizes being put into the Constitution instead of being made a statute.  (And I might remind everyone that most state Constitution votes these days are the result of what the Legislature itself has voted to put on the ballot.) 

 

Previous attempts to get our state legislators to create “Legislative Initiative” for citizens  have gone nowhere.  Years ago Don Tucker, the former Democratic Speaker of the Florida House, told me that a bill I was able to get out of committee creating “Legislative Initiative,”, would go no further -- and it didn't -- since it threatened politicians’ power.

 

For the Legislative Initiative, we should make the percentage of required signatures lower than for Constitutional Amendments; require only a simple majority to pass the statute; and provide that any statute created this way must be submitted to the voters a second time in the future, to alter or repeal it (to avoid the legislature simply passing something themselves that potentially thwarts the will of the voters).  And locally, all citizens of local governments should be able to initiate ordinances, not just Cities or Charter Counties .  Local governments should be allowed to set a lower percentage of required signatures, if they don’t want to follow the state-set percentage.

 

(2) Create expanded “Referendum powers” for all local governments. Citizens need a mechanism to be able to effectively challenge decisions by their elected officials. 

(3)  Enable citizens to Recall elected officials more easily.  Astonishingly, there are various officials to whom recall does not currently apply, and it needs to. And, for all officials, though the percentage of signatures necessary to accomplish Recall needs to remain somewhat substantial, the primary reasons why you can recall an elected official need to be loosened.  It's simply too difficult to make Recall fit the usual "misfeasance, malfeasance, etc." categories.  I've had citizens gather signatures from 15% of registered voters within 30 days, only to have a court say they couldn't make their issues properly fit the Recall definition.  If citizens are outraged enough at a decision that their elected official makes, they should be able to try to remove them right away.  We should also lengthen somewhat the time frame within which the signatures can be gathered, to make it possible to use Recall.

 

Some would say that I haven't mentioned one obvious reform that would help citizens curb the influence of Big Money:  it’s called “Clean Elections/Public Financing.”   For example, we’ve just seen the grassroots Florida Hometown Democracy crushed by Big Money, and the same could well happen to  a proposed ban on Offshore Oil Drilling.  Unfortunately,  unless and until the U.S. Supreme Court has its makeup changed to overrule the recent Citizens United and older Buckley decisions, or unless a federal constitutional amendment is enacted to overrule those decisions  -- decisions that have both unleashed unlimited Big-Money influence on our politicians, the Supreme Court is currently composed to eviscerate any “Clean Elections/Public Financing” reforms.

 

It's important to note that Initiative, Referendum and Recall themselves are content-neutral and can be utilized by any citizen or organization.  Enactment of the above reforms will go a long way toward restoring the power of the citizenry, curbing the influence of insiders, and moving Florida towards a better place than where it is currently headed.

John Hedrick has been an activist for 40 years, an attorney for 25 years; lobbied, been a candidate, run campaigns, studied Political Science and is chair of Panhandle Citizens Coalition and President of People's Transit Organization. He can be reached at johnhedrick13@... .



 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - To unsubscribe from the FL-CONSERVATION-FORUM list, send any message to: FL-CONSERVATION-FORUM-signoff-request@... Check out our Listserv Lists support site for more information: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/faq.asp To view the Sierra Club List Terms & Conditions, see: http://www.sierraclub.org/lists/terms.asp

#5757 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sun Mar 6, 2011 5:41 pm
Subject: Carl Hiaasen: Lawmakers muddy the waters around us...
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 


Lawmakers help muddy the waters around us



By CARL HIAASEN

chiaasen@...

A few years ago, residents along the eastern St. Lucie River watched
in disgust as the waterway turned green with a foul slime that
wouldn’t go away.

Health officials warned people to stay away from the river. Birds and
fish got sick. Property values dived to new lows, while politicians
holding jarfuls of crud grimaced for the TV cameras and vowed to take
action.

The mystery ooze was caused by nutrients dumped into Lake Okeechobee
from farms, groves and ranchlands, churned by hurricanes and then
pumped out by state water managers at the rate of 26,000 gallons per
second.

It was a suffocating act of pollution that could easily happen again,
because the polluters still steer water policy, and the politicians.

U.S. Rep. Tom Rooney, a Republican from Tequesta, recently tacked a
rider on the federal budget package that would prohibit the
Environmental Protection Agency from enacting tighter restrictions on
the amount of phosphorous and nitrogen that may be flushed into
Florida’s public waters.

The EPA rules, devised in conjunction with the state’s Department of
Environmental Protection, have been the subject of several public
hearings. Public comments were 10-to-1 in favor of the regulations.

Critics say compliance would be too expensive for farms, small
business and public utilities. State agriculture officials estimated a
potential loss of 14,000 jobs, a sky-is-falling prediction that will
never come to pass.

Rooney’s lead role in trying to block the pollution guidelines is
interesting because he supposedly represents all those folks along the
St. Lucie who got slimed back in 2005.

In a lame oped column defending his position, the congressman wrote
that the new EPA rules “could cost our state’s economy about $2
billion, and would double the average family’s water bill.”

It’s a preposterous statement, pure fiction, but the aim isn’t to
inform people. The aim is to scare them. The script (and dire
predictions) come from lobbyists for Big Agriculture, municipalities
and corporate interests who freely use Florida’s lakes, bays and
rivers as a latrine.

Rooney doesn’t use the word “polluters.” He calls them “job creators.”

In the coming days, Sen. Marco Rubio is expected to amend the Senate
budget resolution with a similar rider that would bar the EPA from
imposing the new water regulations in Florida. Whether the measure
survives or not remains to be seen.

The main objection to the rules is, naturally, that they’re too
strict. The revised limits on phosphorus and nitrogen — which are
found in sewage, fertilizer runoff and animal manure — were set after
state and federal scientists took about 13,000 water samples at 2,200
locations.

Rooney and others have been pressing for a third-party scientific
review of the approved levels, but environmental groups say the data
is clear and that the time for delay is over.

Toxic algae blooms from nutrient pollution have endangered public
beaches, waterways and drinking supplies. Last summer it was a
100-mile stretch of the St. Johns River that turned bright green, at
an untold cost to the boating and sportfishing industries.

In recent years, poisoned runoff has also been blamed for caustic red
tide outbreaks that have killed thousands of fish and sent tourists
packing (and coughing) along Florida’s southwest coast.

It’s an absolute fact that some farms and ranches will have to spend
serious money to clean up their act. It’s also an absolute fact that
new pollution rules are essential for Florida’s economic future.

In a state that relies so heavily on tourism and outdoor recreation,
dirty water is major job killer. This was painfully evident throughout
the Panhandle after the BP oil spill, but memories are very short in
Washington.

While some agricultural operations in Florida have taken important
steps to reduce harmful runoff, others haven’t. More destructive algae
blooms are a certainty.

And nothing says “Welcome to Florida!” like aerial video of a
scum-filled river or a beach plastered with rotting fish.

Meanwhile, Rooney says he’s a friend of the environment and a big fan
of clean water. He says he favors a “reasonable compromise” on
nutrient pollution, which would be fine if the concept of “reasonable”
was based on science and not big-money politics.

Rooney doesn’t sound much like a serious compromiser when he blasts
the EPA for acting “tyrannically and dictatorially.” For the record,
the modern Clean Water Act has been on the books since he was in
diapers.

Before anything else happens, the congressman wants the feds to
calculate the potential impact of new pollution rules on the
polluters.

If only he was as concerned about the impact of future slime torrents
on the folks who live along the St. Lucie.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/03/05/2100212/lawmakers-help-muddy-the-waters.html#ixzz1FpnwoQYu
 
*************************

#5758 From: FINDJohnJ@...
Date: Sun Mar 6, 2011 7:18 pm
Subject: Everything Is Connected - John Jackson's Email
FINDJohnJ@...
Send Email Send Email
 
 EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED!
 
Report #1:     Poetry                       
Report #2:     Congregational Life
Report #3:     Every Day Is Earth Day
Report #3:     Here’s To Your Health
Report #4:     Floridians, How Do You Like Your Government Now?
Report #5:     Laughter Is The Best Medicine
 
* * * * * * * * *
AWAKE THE STATE ON MARCH 8
 
FCAN – Florida Consumer Action Network
813-410-1044
 
Rick Scott is ready to lay off 8681 workers.  Rick Scott is increasing taxes on the public workers by $1.3 billion.  Rick Scott is making the biggest cuts to education in state history.  And this is money that is coming out of YOUR pocket book.
 
Mad yet?  The Governor plans to slash our police, fire, mental health, veterans, homelessness, environmental protection, community development, health care and transportation budget by $4.6 billion and give billions in breaks to big corporations and important necessities like yachts and Orlando Magic Box Seats.
 
Mad yet?  How about the fact that he more than doubled his office budget by more than $340 million!  How many quality teachers could we hire with that?  How many of the 19,000 homeless children could we find a home for with that (instead of doing away with the entire homelessness budget like he plans to do)?
 
It is time to Awake the State on March 1.
 
The Awake the State website is: www.awakethestate.com
 
The Facebook page is: www.facebook.com/awakethestate
 
The Tampa Specific Facebook Event pate is: www.Facebook.com/event.php?eid=127661643974056
 
The Twitter account is @awakethestate, the hashtag is #awakeFL
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
It has been aptly said, “Beware of half truths because you may get the wrong half.”
 
* * * * * * * * * *
 
EVERYTHING WE DO
 
Everything we do is for our first loves
whom we have lost irrevocably
who have married insurance salesmen
and moved to Topeka
and never think of us at all.
 
We fly planes & design buildings and write poems
that all say Sally I love you
I‘ll never love anyone else.
Why didn‘t you know I was going to be a poet?
 
The walks to school, the kisses in the snow
gather as we dream backwards, sweetness with age:
our legs are young again, our voices
strong and happy, we’re not afraid.
We don’t know enough to be afraid.
 
And now
we hold (hidden, hopeless) the hope
that some day
she may fly in our plane
enter our building, read our poem
 
And that night, deep in her dream,
Sally, far in darkness, in Topeka,
with the salesman lying beside her,
will cry out
our unfamiliar name.
 
by Peter Meinke
from Liquid Paper: New and Selected Poems
 
 
* * * * * * * * * *
In these tenuous days of economic uncertainty, prudent people are diversifying their money.  They’re putting some in the mattress, some in the cookie jar, and burying some in the yard.
 
.* * * * * * * * *
 
HOW WOULD YOU LIVE THEN?
 
Voice 1:            What if a hundred rose-breasted grosbeaks
                                    flew in circles around your head?
 
Voice 2:            What if the mockingbird came into the house with you
                                    and became your advisor?
 
Voice 1:            What if the bees filled your walls with honey and all
                                    you needed to do was ask them and they would
                                    fill your bowl?
 
Voice 1:            What if the brook slid downhill just past your bedroom window
                                    so you could listen to its slow prayers as you fell asleep?
 
Voice 2:            What if the stars began to shout their names, or to run this way and that
                                    way above the clouds?
 
Voice 1:            What if you painted a picture of a tree, and the leaves began to rustle,
                                    and a bird cheerfully sang from its painted branches?
 
Voice 2:            What if you suddenly saw that the silver of water was brighter than the
                                    silver of money?
 
Voice 1:            What if you finally saw that the sunflowers, turning toward the sun all
day and every day – who knows how, but they do it – were
more precious, more meaningful than gold?
 
Voice 2:            How would you live then?
 
Mary Oliver
 
* * * * * * * * *
Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we posses. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victim.                    - Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
* * * * * * * * *
UNITED STATES POPULATION FACTS
 
Fast Facts About U.S. Population Growth
                Over four million babies are born each year in the United States.
                The U.S. population is growing by about 2.5 million people each year. Of that, immigration contributes over one million people to the U.S. population annually.
                The U.S. fertility rate is currently 2.0 births per woman, an increase from 1.8 in 1988.
                The United States has one of the highest natural growth rates (0.7%) of any industrialized country in the world. For comparison, the United Kingdom's natural increase is one quarter the rate of the U.S. at 0.2%, while Germany's natural increase is 0.
                Using the Census Bureau's medium projections, U.S. population will grow to 394 million by the year 2050.
                Eight states have population growth rates over 2.0%, which means their population will double in less than 35 years.
                Along our coasts, where nearly half the population lives, the U.S. is among the more densely populated countries in the world. The Northeast averages 767 people per square mile, while Haiti, for comparison, has 580.
                By 2010, when California's population reaches 50 million, population densities in coastal California will reach 1,050 people per square mile.
                46% of the U.S. population lives in coastal regions where ecosystems are the most fragile.
                California, Florida and Texas account for one-quarter of the U.S. population and were responsible for 38% of all U.S. population growth between 1940 and 1990.
                Florida's population has grown from 1.9 million in 1940 to 15 million today. That is over a 600% increase in just 50 years.
 
 
  • The United States, with 310 million people, is the THIRD LARGEST country in the world, and the fastest growing industrialized country.
 
  • Americans comprise 4.4% of the world’s people, but consume about 24% of the world’s resources.  Iv everyone (7 billion in 2011) consumed the way Americans do, we would need at least FOUR MORE planet Earths to support us.
 
  • U.S. Population is projected to grow to approximately 600 million during the lifetime of a child born today.
 
  • This growth amplifies every other social, economic, environmental and governmental problem that Americans face.
 
 
 
* * * * * * *
If we don't halt population growth with justice and compassion, it will be done for us by nature, brutally and without pity- and will leave a ravaged world.
-Nobel Laureate Dr. Henry W. Kendall
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
TAMING THE OVERACTIVE BLADDER
 
What should you drink or eat to minimize overactive bladder issues?
 
As many as 33 million Americans deal with the symptoms of OAB every day.  These symptoms include frequent urination – urinating more than eight times a day or more than once a night – and having a strong and sudden urge to urinate.
 
Help is available and you can get relief.  Talk to your doctor about medications that can keep OAB            in check.  Also, shift your diet to help reduce symptoms.  Check our OAB diet charts to see how what you eat and drink affects your bladder.
 
 
WHAT TO AVOID
 
Food or Drink
Examples
Effect on Incontinence
Caffeinated beverages and food
Coffee, tea, soda and chocolate
Stimulate the bladder
Act as diuretics, producing more urine
Alcoholic beverages
Liquor, wine and beer
Cause dehydration by increasing amount of urine.
Interfere with brain’s signals to the bladder about when to release urine.
Spicy foods
Curries and chilies
Irritate the bladder
Acidic foods and drinks
Citrus fruits, like oranges, grapefruits and lemons, and juices.
Tomato-based products, like sauces
Irritate the bladder
Carbonated drinks
Soda and beer
Irritate the bladder
Artificial sweeteners
Sugar substitutes or low-calorie sweeteners
Irritate the bladder
 
 
WHAT TO EAT AND DRINK
 
Food or Drink
Examples
Effect on Incontinence
Water
Tap water, bottled water
Drinking less than 6 glasses a day causes urine to be highly concentrated, which irritates the bladder
Non-citrus fruits
Apples, bananas, and berries
Unlike citrus fruits, will not irritate the bladder
Whole Grains
Whole-wheat bread or pasta, barley, buckwheat and oatmeal
Fiber-rich foods help to avoid constipation, which causes or exacerbates urinary incontinence
Legumes
Peas, beans, lentils, alfalfa and soy
Provide fiber
Vegetables
Spinach, lettuce and broccoli
Provide fiber
 
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect.           Steven Wright
 
* * * * * * * * * * *
 
NEVER SAY TO A COP
 
  1. I can’t reach my license unless you hold my beer.  (OK in Texas)
 
  1. Sorry, Officer, I didn’t realize my radar detector wasn’t plugged in.
 
  1. Aren’t you the guy from the Village People?
 
  1. Hey, you must’ve been doin’ about 125 mph to keep up with me.  Good job!
 
  1. Are you Andy or Barney?
 
  1. I thought you had to be in relatively good physical condition to be a police officer.
 
  1. You’re not gonna check the trunk, are you?
 
  1. I pay your salary!
 
  1. Gee, Officer!  That’s terrific.  The last officer only gave me a warning, too!
 
  1. Do you know why you pulled me over?  Okay, just so one of us does.
 
  1. I was trying to keep up with traffic.  Yes, I know there are no other cars around… That’s how far ahead of me they are.
 
  1. When the officer says “Gee, your eyes look red, have you been drinking?”  You probably shouldn’t respond with, “Gee, Officer, your eyes look glazed, have you been eating doughnuts?”

#5759 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:00 pm
Subject: Fw: Links to articles in today's press about environmental health
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

 
From: AboveTheFold AboveTheFold@...
Sent: Sat, March 12, 2011 9:25:30 AM
Subject: Links to articles in today's press about environmental health

Environmental Health News

Above the fold. News aggregated by www.EnvironmentalHealthNews.org


Don't miss the link to
today's good news

Read today's editorials

Daily links to top stories in the news about environmental health.

Explosion rocks Japan nuclear plant after quake. An explosion at a nuclear power plant in northern Japan on Saturday blew the roof off one building, brought down walls and caused a radiation leak of unspecified proportions, Japanese officials said, after Friday’s huge earthquake caused critical failures in the plant’s cooling system. New York Times [Registration Required]
http://nyti.ms/i8TD4k

Japan nuclear reactor may be in meltdown. Japanese authorities said Saturday afternoon that a nuclear reactor about 150 miles north of Tokyo may be experiencing a meltdown after Friday's massive earthquake damaged its cooling systems. The government is evacuating 20,000 people near troubled facilities, as vapor Is vented to ease pressure. Wall Street Journal [Subscription Required]
http://on.wsj.com/gkR3Pt

Sirens, evacuations on a frenzied Friday. Tsunami surges heavily damaged Crescent City Harbor and swept a man to his death at the mouth of the Klamath River on Friday. Though no damage was reported in downtown Crescent City, which was devastated by a tsunami in 1964, the harbor was battered and numerous fishing boats were damaged. Crescent City Daily Triplicate, California.
http://bit.ly/f6RU8S

Japan earthquake may push oil prices higher. The 8.9-magnitude temblor forced the shutdown of a number of Japan's oil refining facilities as well as some of its nuclear power plants. The loss of substantial refining capacity in the world's third-largest economy is likely to inject more volatility into gasoline prices — raising the risk of even higher pump prices for American motorists. Los Angeles Times, California. [Registration Required]
http://lat.ms/dFZgpI

Maryland Health Department investigating destruction of lead paint records. The state's health secretary said Friday that his department's laboratory has destroyed test results dating back to the 1980s documenting lead poisoning of Maryland children — potentially thousands of records that are crucial to lawsuits seeking damages on behalf of poisoned children. Baltimore Sun, Maryland.
http://bit.ly/hAVByb

Chemical review. Forty-five million different chemicals are commercially available around the world — and many of these chemicals go untested. Patricia Hunt from Washington State University has called for more stringent review of chemicals. Her letter to the journal Science was co-signed by scientific societies representing 40,000 researchers and clinicians. Living On Earth
http://bit.ly/hIOtlY

Powerful toxin found in dead sardines. Sardines that suffocated and died en masse this week in King Harbor have tested positive for a powerful neurotoxin that scientists believe  may have distressed 1 million or more fish off the Los Angeles coastline and caused them to swim chaotically into the Redondo Beach marina. Los Angeles Times, California. [Registration Required]
http://lat.ms/h0ekid

Secondhand smoke linked to diabetes. Cigarette smoke is tied to a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, both for smokers and the people around them, a new study shows. And the more secondhand smoke people are exposed to, the greater their risk of type 2 diabetes, according to the paper in Diabetes Care. Reuters
http://reut.rs/ebU4Ir

London gets extra time to clean up air. Europe has given Britain three more months to meet air quality standards in London or face huge fines, on the condition that the capital steps up measures to tackle pollution. The European Commission said it was giving the UK until June 11 to meet limits on the amount of airborne PM10 particles in the atmosphere or face legal action. Agence France-Presse
http://yhoo.it/i90jCx

EPA: Abandoned California mercury mine a toxic hazard. An abandoned mercury mine that for decades has sent polluted, orange waste into a creek that eventually feeds into San Francisco Bay is a threat to human health and should be added to a list of the nation's worst polluted places, federal environmental regulators say. Associated Press
http://yhoo.it/hcYohB

Passive smoking increases stillbirth risk, says study. Fathers-to-be should stop smoking to protect their unborn child from the risk of stillbirth or birth defects, scientists say. University of Nottingham researchers found that pregnant women exposed to smoke at work or home increased their risk of stillbirth by 23% and of having a baby with defects by 13%. BBC
http://bbc.in/hVe8yK

Betting on green. Vinod Khosla has a different plan to save the planet. He is investing over $1 billion of his clients’ money in “black swans”—ideas with the potential for sudden jumps in technology that promise huge environmental benefits, easy scalability and rapid payback. The catch? Mr Khosla expects nine out of ten of his investments to fail. Economist
http://econ.st/ftNV6j

Law on light bulb efficiency angers conservatives. American protests against the encroachment of government have been spurred by many causes — tea, of course, and guns, frequently. The latest catalyst: light bulbs. New York Times [Registration Required]
http://nyti.ms/gyBoF9

Democrats cry foul over GOP's attempts to tie fuel prices to EPA. House Republicans' move to join the two most politically volatile threads in the Washington, D.C., energy debate -- gas prices and U.S. EPA rules -- sparked Democratic charges of deception yesterday and silence so far from the Obama administration. Greenwire
http://nyti.ms/gPwgo3

'Text - don't call,' Government tells mobile users for first time. Mobile phone users have been advised by the Government for the first time to text or use hands free kits rather than make calls. The Department of Health said this would reduce the user's exposure to reduce radiation emitted by the devices. London Daily Mail, United Kingdom.
http://bit.ly/eAjiab

Water board to begin preparation of civil penalties for PG&E's expanding plume. The Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board this week asked staff to prepare appropriate civil penalties against Pacific Gas & Electric Co. for its failure to control the spread of the chromium 6 plume in Hinkley. San Bernardino County Sun, California.
http://bit.ly/hrmjjt

Inside story: How illuminating. Scientists have uncovered the biochemical mechanisms used by living organisms to produce light, known as bioluminescence. They are putting those tricks to a dazzling range of uses, including the detection of viruses and pollution. Economist
http://econ.st/dQwK5w

Urban homesteaders find ideal ground in Altadena. Neighbors swap produce, honey, eggs and much more in Altadena. This isn't just growing your own, a few clay pots on a condo balcony, say, or a tomato patch next to the rose bed. It's full-on urban homesteading. Los Angeles Times, California. [Registration Required]
http://lat.ms/exNuu5

More news from today
>130 more stories, including:
Finding lost frogs
Climate: Producing organic photovoltaics; Polar ice loss accelerating; Climate to devastate wildlife; Aviation's contribution to global warming; China to build 60 reactors over next decade; Europe's climate policy
Consumer product safety database goes online
Much more about Japanese earthquake
Stories from UK, Japan, China, India, Australia, Brazil, Canada
US stories from VT, RI, NY, NJ, PA, WV, NC, SC, FL, MN, IL, KY, LA, TX, MT, AZ, WA, OR, CA, AK
Editorials: Earthquake insurance, 400 dead kids; Gas prices and sane energy policy

Shortcuts to stories from today about The good news, Avian flu, Katrina, Climate, Children's health, Air pollution, Cancer, Reproductive disorders, Endocrine disruption, Birth defects, Learning and developmental disabilities, Immune disorders, Environmental justice, Superfund, Water treatment/sewage, Food safety, Integrity of science, Green chemistry.

You can also read last weekend's news.

Plus: If you were on vacation last week, don't miss last week's top stories...

Would you like to display the news stories from EnvironmentalHealthNews.org on your own web site? Check out our RSS feeds.

Compiled by Environmental Health Sciences
421 Park Street, Suite 4 Charlottesville, VA USA 22902
www.EnvironmentalHealthNews.org
feedback@...

Having problems viewing this e-mail? View the newsletter online.

To ensure delivery to your inbox, please add AboveTheFold@... to your address book.

If you received this email from a friend and would like to start receiving our newsletter yourself you may subscribe here.

This message was originally sent to hopeforcleanwater@.... You are receiving this e-mail because you have subscribed to receive AboveTheFold. To end your subscription unsubscribe here.


#5760 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:09 pm
Subject: BIOMESS: "Gainesville's Bridge to Nowhere"
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 

Is the Tree Burning BioMass Plant a "done deal," as the Gainesville Sun suggests?

No, not by a long shot.

Please review and pass along this important information.

Attached:


Gainesville's Bridge --  Ad Layout EDIT D.pdf

 

Gainesville’s "Bridge to Nowhere"

Is the Tree-burning BioMass Plant a "done deal,"

as the Gainesville Sun suggests?

Ten years is too long a time to be tying up a

huge amount of Rate Payer dollars in an

investment that GRU simply doesn't need.

Just ask any freshman business major.

No, not by a long shot.

What we are doing now is moving beyond the

tightly restricted legal challenges of 2010.

We need to bring this issue home to

the Gainesville City Commission.

It is Gainesville’s "Bridge to Nowhere."

The Secret Contract requires us to buy

all the power the plant produces,

no matter if we need it or not.

The price and supply of fuel is uncertain.

The City Commission’s plan is to sell

this expensive excess power elsewhere.

But who’s going to buy it?

There is excess power capacity all over Florida.

Projects are being cancelled or delayed

because electrical usage is down.

And GRU still doesn't have

a single sales contract, a single buyer.

The clock is ticking.

Every one of the administrative cases has been

hamstrung by the governing tribunal's caveat,

that the cost of financing the project, the

cost to the city's Rate Payers, was off-limits.

Time and again, these limited administrative appeals

ruled out evidence that this project

will bankrupt our city.

With all of these bureaucratic decisions from Florida’s

"Permit Approval" machinery out of the way, we can

at last turn back to the central driving issue:

The Sun reported that a biomass company spokesman

promised they will soon reveal the actual contents of

the Secret Contract for the Tree-burning Plant.

It's about time. Therein lie the answers.

The crucial issue on the BioMass Plant

has always been the huge Financial Risk,

a risk that will be borne by the Rate Payers.

Now is the time to extricate ourselves,

before real money goes down the rat-hole.

The potential cost of extrication from

the Contract may turn out to be lower

than the costs if we go forward

with this disastrous Contract

– a bankrupted city, high utility bills,

road damage, truck traffic, air pollution,

massive water withdrawals from the

aquifer, depleted forests, sickened citizens.

Will the exorbitant cost (over $2 Billion in local dollars)

of this unneeded plant be passed on to Gainesville’s

Rate Payers, regardless that the power is not needed,

not needed for at least 10 years after the plant is built?

Any business proceeding with that model is doomed.

You don't put all that money into something

that you won't need for ten years.

Yet GRU and the City Commissioners are doing just that,

throwing away our Rate Payer money.

It is time to bring the question home.

Out of the realm of the lofty and indifferent

administrative courts, down to our

lofty and indifferent City Commissioners.

They loudly proclaim their standard excuse, that

"these Projects take time, you gotta start early."

The Plant takes only 3 years to build.

How can we get out of this, and what's it going to cost?

Citizens Opposed to BioBurners PO Box 23709 Gainesville FL 32602 (352) 215-9099


 
*************************
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@...  "We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 







 

1 of 1 File(s)


#5761 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:19 pm
Subject: CARL HIAASEN---Lawmakers help muddy the waters around us - 03/05/2011 | MiamiHerald.com
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 
From: lloydb4 lloydb4@...

Subject: CARL HIAASEN---Lawmakers help muddy the waters around us - 03/05/2011 | MiamiHerald.com

Lawmakers help muddy the waters around us - 03/05/2011 | MiamiHerald.com

The Miami Herald Posted on Sat, Mar. 05, 2011

 Lawmakers help muddy the waters around us By CARL HIAASEN chiaasen@...

A few years ago, residents along the eastern St. Lucie River watched in disgust as the waterway turned green with a foul slime that wouldn’t go away. Health officials warned people to stay away from the river. Birds and fish got sick. Property values dived to new lows, while politicians holding jarfuls of crud grimaced for the TV cameras and vowed to take action.

The mystery ooze was caused by nutrients dumped into Lake Okeechobee from farms, groves and ranchlands, churned by hurricanes and then pumped out by state water managers at the rate of 26,000 gallons per second.

 It was a suffocating act of pollution that could easily happen again, because the polluters still steer water policy, and the politicians.

 U.S. Rep. Tom Rooney, a Republican from Tequesta, recently tacked a rider on the federal budget package that would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from enacting tighter restrictions on the amount of phosphorous and nitrogen that may be flushed into Florida’s public waters.

 The EPA rules, devised in conjunction with the state’s Department of Environmental Protection, have been the subject of several public hearings. Public comments were 10-to-1 in favor of the regulations. Critics say compliance would be too expensive for farms, small business and public utilities. State agriculture officials estimated a potential loss of 14,000 jobs, a sky-is-falling prediction that will never come to pass. Rooney’s lead role in trying to block the pollution guidelines is interesting because he supposedly represents all those folks along the St. Lucie who got slimed back in 2005. In a lame oped column defending his position, the congressman wrote that the new EPA rules “could cost our state’s economy about $2 billion, and would double the average family’s water bill.” It’s a preposterous statement, pure fiction, but the aim isn’t to inform people. The aim is to scare them. The script (and dire predictions) come from lobbyists for Big Agriculture, municipalities and corporate interests who freely use Florida’s lakes, bays and rivers as a latrine. Rooney doesn’t use the word “polluters.” He calls them “job creators.” In the coming days, Sen. Marco Rubio is expected to amend the Senate budget resolution with a similar rider that would bar the EPA from imposing the new water regulations in Florida. Whether the measure survives or not remains to be seen. The main objection to the rules is, naturally, that they’re too strict. The revised limits on phosphorus and nitrogen — which are found in sewage, fertilizer runoff and animal manure — were set after state and federal scientists took about 13,000 water samples at 2,200 locations. Rooney and others have been pressing for a third-party scientific review of the approved levels, but environmental groups say the data is clear and that the time for delay is over. Toxic algae blooms from nutrient pollution have endangered public beaches, waterways and drinking supplies. Last summer it was a 100-mile stretch of the St. Johns River that turned bright green, at an untold cost to the boating and sportfishing industries. In recent years, poisoned runoff has also been blamed for caustic red tide outbreaks that have killed thousands of fish and sent tourists packing (and coughing) along Florida’s southwest coast. It’s an absolute fact that some farms and ranches will have to spend serious money to clean up their act. It’s also an absolute fact that new pollution rules are essential for Florida’s economic future. In a state that relies so heavily on tourism and outdoor recreation, dirty water is major job killer. This was painfully evident throughout the Panhandle after the BP oil spill, but memories are very short in Washington. While some agricultural operations in Florida have taken important steps to reduce harmful runoff, others haven’t. More destructive algae blooms are a certainty. And nothing says “Welcome to Florida!” like aerial video of a scum-filled river or a beach plastered with rotting fish. Meanwhile, Rooney says he’s a friend of the environment and a big fan of clean water. He says he favors a “reasonable compromise” on nutrient pollution, which would be fine if the concept of “reasonable” was based on science and not big-money politics. Rooney doesn’t sound much like a serious compromiser when he blasts the EPA for acting “tyrannically and dictatorially.” For the record, the modern Clean Water Act has been on the books since he was in diapers. Before anything else happens, the congressman wants the feds to calculate the potential impact of new pollution rules on the polluters. If only he was as concerned about the impact of future slime torrents on the folks who live along the St. Lucie.
 
 
 
  http://www.miamiherald.com


- Sent using Google Toolbar

#5762 From: Joy Towles Ezell <hopeforcleanwater@...>
Date: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:15 pm
Subject: State, national Audubons distance themselves from group named in golf-in-state-park bill
hopeforclean...
Send Email Send Email
 
 

State, national Audubons distance themselves from group named in golf-in-state-park bill

 
The National Audubon Society (Audubon) was founded in 1905 for the purpose of conserving and restoring natural ecosystems, focusing on birds and other wildlife, and their habitats. Audubon is supported by over 400,000 members with state offices, programs, and 500 chapters across the country. #


******************************************* 
Joy Towles Ezell   hopeforcleanwater@... 
"We are the ones we've been waiting for."
850 584 7087 office & fax    850 843 1574 cell  
 

Messages 5733 - 5762 of 6161   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help