I looked at breviary.net, for the commemoration of the 22nd Sunday, and I could
not find the V/R used there...I found the Ant once, but not again when I was
looking for the V/R.  What is the rubric re: commemoration of the Sunday during
a feast?

Charles Smith

I see my mistake.  The Breviary.net is Roman, and using the 23 Sunday after
Pentecost, which would be the Anglican, 24th Sunday after Trinity..and there I
found the Ant for the Magnificat.  The V/R were the ones normally used at
Vespers on a Sunday!  They are on B31.

I apologize for the original question, I just got lost in the confluence of
Christ the King, All Saints, and the Trinity 22.

God's blessings on all of you.

Charles Smith

I have been using the Anglican Breviary in conjunction with BReviary.net bur the
V/R of the lessons in these nocturnes don't agree.  I found one of them in
Common 6 but couldn't  find them all.  Is the Roman breviary and Anglican
Breviary different with these V/R?
Charles Smith

Yes, Jim, and there seems to be a wider variety of lessons...the gospel is the
same, but, the homily is different on Thursday and Friday in the Roman Breviary
on breviary.net, as opposed to the AB.  I've been doing the assigned scripture
for the appropriate day in AB for Nocturn 1, but, following the breviary.net for
Nocturn 2 & 3.

Charles Smith
--- In divineoffice@yahoogroups.com, JamesEHicksVI@... wrote:
>
>
> I wish I knew the answer!!!!!!
>
> Jim Hicks
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anglicancharles <anglicancharles@...>
> To: divineoffice <divineoffice@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, Nov 5, 2010 7:59 pm
> Subject: [divineoffice] Matins 2 & 3 nocturne during Octave
>
>
>
>
> I have been using the Anglican Breviary in conjunction with BReviary.net bur
the V/R of the lessons in these nocturnes don't agree. I found one of them in
Common 6 but couldn't find them all. Is the Roman breviary and Anglican Breviary
different with these V/R?
> Charles Smith
>

Can anyone recommend a good commentary on the Psalms that uses for its text the
Coverdale translation?
At present I am using "The Psalms" by WE Barnes in the Westminster Commentaries
Series [pub 1931] which, though good, is irritating as it uses the text of the
Revised Version.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Had my copy of the Breviary covered professionally in top grain leather. Went
with the medieval style with modified ribs on the spine and a nice decoration to
go with the title.
Check out the photos section. Pat

Very nicely done.  Where did you have the work done?

Patrick <patrick_hanly@...> wrote:

>Had my copy of the Breviary covered professionally in top grain leather. Went
with the medieval style with modified ribs on the spine and a nice decoration to
go with the title.
>Check out the photos section. Pat
>

I got it done at Old Leather Books in Erving, Mass.

www.oldleather.com

Sandy is a one person shop and will take the time to speak with you in detail
before you go forward. The good news is that the sticking of the book is done
well so it did not need to be done over. Not cheap but I love the book that it
was worth it. Could be done a little cheaper with a basic leather cover (rather
than the medieval) but I couldn't resist.

Pat

--- In divineoffice@yahoogroups.com, "Sean W. Reed" <skreed1@...> wrote:
>
> Very nicely done.  Where did you have the work done?
>
> Patrick <patrick_hanly@...> wrote:
>
> >Had my copy of the Breviary covered professionally in top grain leather. Went
with the medieval style with modified ribs on the spine and a nice decoration to
go with the title.
> >Check out the photos section. Pat
> >
>

In the proper of the day, the rubrics call for a ferial Compline.

Am I correct that this is a gentle reminder that Martinmas is not of sufficient
nobility to take the antiphon and psalms of Sunday, and that therefore they are
taken from the occurrent day of the week?

The only other interpretation I could divine is that the rubrics are calling for
the dominical Preces even though the Hour is recited within an Office of Double
rite.  I am doubtful of this, however, since the rubrics of Compline
specifically state that the Preces are omitted on Doubles.

Yours,
Richard

Your first supposition is correct. It's because St Martin of Tours is a semi-excepted Feast. The Psalms at Matins, Lauds and II Vespers are of Sunday (or from the Common). This is a reminder that Compline is not of Sunday, but the weekday. You will find that it also gives you the same reminder about Prime and the Little Hours.

The Psalms at I Vespers would also be of Sunday, but the preceding Feast is of equal rank and therefore the Psalms belong to it.

Best wishes,

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: richardeasterling [mailto:easterling@...]
Sent: 11 November 2010 04:13
To: divineoffice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Martinmas Compline

In the proper of the day, the rubrics call for a ferial Compline. 

Am I correct that this is a gentle reminder that Martinmas is not of sufficient nobility to take the antiphon and psalms of Sunday, and that therefore they are taken from the occurrent day of the week?

The only other interpretation I could divine is that the rubrics are calling for the dominical Preces even though the Hour is recited within an Office of Double rite.  I am doubtful of this, however, since the rubrics of Compline specifically state that the Preces are omitted on Doubles.

Yours,

Richard

----- Original Message -----

From: Mark Forster

To: divineoffice@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:21 AM

Subject: [divineoffice] RE: Martinmas Compline

 

Your first supposition is correct. It's because St Martin of Tours is a semi-excepted Feast. The Psalms at Matins, Lauds and II Vespers are of Sunday (or from the Common). This is a reminder that Compline is not of Sunday, but the weekday. You will find that it also gives you the same reminder about Prime and the Little Hours.

The Psalms at I Vespers would also be of Sunday, but the preceding Feast is of equal rank and therefore the Psalms belong to it.

Best wishes,

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: richardeasterling [mailto:easterling@...]
Sent: 11 November 2010 04:13
To: divineoffice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Martinmas Compline

In the proper of the day, the rubrics call for a ferial Compline. 

Am I correct that this is a gentle reminder that Martinmas is not of sufficient nobility to take the antiphon and psalms of Sunday, and that therefore they are taken from the occurrent day of the week?

The only other interpretation I could divine is that the rubrics are calling for the dominical Preces even though the Hour is recited within an Office of Double rite.  I am doubtful of this, however, since the rubrics of Compline specifically state that the Preces are omitted on Doubles.

Yours,

Richard

----- Original Message -----

From: richardeasterling

To: divineoffice@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:13 AM

Subject: [divineoffice] Martinmas Compline

 

In the proper of the day, the rubrics call for a ferial Compline.

Am I correct that this is a gentle reminder that Martinmas is not of sufficient nobility to take the antiphon and psalms of Sunday, and that therefore they are taken from the occurrent day of the week?

The only other interpretation I could divine is that the rubrics are calling for the dominical Preces even though the Hour is recited within an Office of Double rite. I am doubtful of this, however, since the rubrics of Compline specifically state that the Preces are omitted on Doubles.

Yours,
Richard

I won't use Facebook because of their disregard for the users privacy.

Sent from my Android phone

On 2010-11-11 8:53 AM, <JamesEHicksVI@...> wrote:

 

Just wondering how many in this group visit the Anglican Breviary page on Facebook?

 

Jim Hicks

I ordered one from him this summer, and it took about two weeks to arrive.  He
never answered my e-mail either, but I did get the breviary!

--- In divineoffice@yahoogroups.com, Ian MacDonald <idmacdonaldns@...> wrote:
>
> I understood that Lancelot Andrewes Press had a few copies for sale. I don't
> know if they still do but it's worth a try. But be patient with Daniel. I
> haven't heard anyone complaining that he hadn't followed through -
> eventually
> Ian+
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Mike Bennett <mbennett1944@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I bought one through the web site a month ago.
> >
> > Mike Bennett
> >
> > On Oct 26, 2010, at 5:33 AM, "shawmt" <shawmt@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://www.anglicanbreviary.net/>http://www.anglicanbreviary.net/
> >
> > Anybody know if these are still available anywhere other than Amazon, which
> > has someone trying to sell a used copy for about $180.00?
> >
> > I presume new copies are not, as the webmaster of the site does not appear
> > to be answering his e-mails.
> >
> > Thanks!!
> >
> >
> >
>

Being of the Celtic-Orthodox bent, I observed today the feast day of the martyr
king St. Edmund, using Common 5.  Tomorrow is the Feast of the Presentation, so
St. Columbanus receives little attention (in addition to falling on a Sunday
this year!).Is it appropriate in normal years to move St. Columbanus to the next
day with a full observence?

Jim Hicks

Does the Feast of St Columbanus fall for you in any of the categories listed
under Heading 4 on p. xliv? If so as a Primary I Class Double it would take
precedence over the Presentation, which you would either ignore altogether
or commemorate as a Permanent Occurrence (i.e. simplify it and commemorate
it at I Vespers, Matins, and Lauds only).

If St Columbanus doesn't fall into any of those categories, then it would
not be correct under the rules to transfer it. It should be commemorated as
a Permanent Occurrence.

Best wishes,

Mark


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim [mailto:JamesEHicksVI@...]
Sent: 20 November 2010 12:38
To: divineoffice@yahoogroups.com
Subject: St. Columbanus Feast Day

Being of the Celtic-Orthodox bent, I observed today the feast day of the
martyr king St. Edmund, using Common 5.  Tomorrow is the Feast of the
Presentation, so St. Columbanus receives little attention (in addition to
falling on a Sunday this year!).Is it appropriate in normal years to move
St. Columbanus to the next day with a full observence?

Jim Hicks

Fr. Gregory Wasson is posting a weekly Ordo on his blog site:

TheAnglicanBreviary.wordpress.com

It is also posted at his Facebook page.

Jim Hicks

Thanks Jim. It is sometimes difficult to navigate. This will be a great asset.
Richard

On Sun Dec 5th, 2010 8:46 AM CST Jim wrote:

>Fr. Gregory Wasson is posting a weekly Ordo on his blog site:
>
>TheAnglicanBreviary.wordpress.com
>
>It is also posted at his Facebook page.
>
>Jim Hicks
>

I would strongly encourage all newer users of the Anglican Breviary, if they
have not done so, to take some quiet time and slowly read the rubrical
information from the editors found on the First Sunday in Advent.  Lots of good
info!


SWR

r morley <rimo1946@...> wrote:

>Thanks Jim. It is sometimes difficult to navigate. This will be a great asset.
Richard
>
>On Sun Dec 5th, 2010 8:46 AM CST Jim wrote:
>
>>Fr. Gregory Wasson is posting a weekly Ordo on his blog site:
>>
>>TheAnglicanBreviary.wordpress.com
>>
>>It is also posted at his Facebook page.
>>
>>Jim Hicks
>>
>
>
>
>