Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

handcousins · Hand Family Cousins

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

Advanced
Messages Help
Messages 7663 - 7692 of 8455   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Show Message Summaries Sort by Date ^  
#7663 From: "Carol Boyd" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Thu Nov 4, 2010 2:18 am
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Newspaper article May 3rd 1910. Gazette of the US Pennsylvania
Carol Boyd
Cape May, NJ

1 of 1 Photo(s)


#7664 From: "george" <gwh1247@...>
Date: Fri Nov 5, 2010 4:11 pm
Subject: William J & Daniel A Hand gravestone at Lawsville Ctr. Pa.
gwh1247
Send Email Send Email
 
I have posted a photo of my self taken along side the grave stone of my ggg
grandfather and Civil War Vetern Daniel A Hand, he is buried with his (I believe
3rd. wife) and his parents William J & Eliza(Force)Hand and some more infant
family members.

#7665 From: sesenn@...
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:24 pm
Subject: new (old) Handcousin
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
Sonny       Welcome to the Handcousins's website.   Ken Grace, Carol Boyd and I are moderators of this website  and we get to approve our new cousins for membership.  We do this only to keep the site from being used for a lot of spam and other subjects not related to family history.
 
Much to my surprise when I read your request to join the Handcousins yesterday I recognized your name and the fact you live in Nevada.  I have been doing family history for years and still have most of the early letters (before computers & e-mail) that I had received in my early correspondence with Hand family members.
 
I looked in my Hand file and did find the couple of letters we sent back and forth in 1993.  You had sent me a list of your descendants starting with Jonathan and Mary unknown.  
 
At the time of our correspondence you were working on a book about a cavalry regiment during the Civil War.  It's always a pleasant surprise to hear from other cousins I have corresponded with through the years.
 
Have you been able to find Jonathan's parents? Maybe someone now will have the connection.
 
Glad to hear from you and hope you enjoy the cousins's website. Do check out the files, database and pictures.
 
Shirley Milewski

#7666 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:17 pm
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Norris Hand
5/17/1919  Millville News

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#7667 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:22 pm
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Philadelphia Inquirer May 16th 1900

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#7668 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:24 pm
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Philadelphia  Inquirer 1/9/1901
John Hand

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#7669 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:28 pm
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
9/9/1836 Public Ledger
John Hand, Lawyer

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#7670 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:33 pm
Subject: Sent from Snipping Tool
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Haven't found the name of the paper. If anyone is interested. I will search for it.
Carol

1 of 1 Photo(s)

#7671 From: Sonny Hand <sonnyhand@...>
Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: Sent from Snipping Tool [1 Attachment]
sonnyhand
Send Email Send Email
 
Carol:

Yes, this Norris is my fathers' father. Norris died in May 1971 and that was when I joined their family construction business and worked with my father as I was just graduating high school.
 
Larner was Norris's brother and George was their father (George Brinton McClellan Hand).

Thank you!

Author of "ONE GOOD REGIMENT" ISBN 1-55212-460-6
The 1st Regimental History of the 13th PA Cavalry
The FLAG IS NOW AVAILABLE! Email me if interested!
Sonny Hand, 440 Foxridge Dr, Spring Crk, NV 89815
sonnyhand@...
www.spyyderwebs.com



From: Carol <grantstbeachbum@...>
To: Handcousins <handcousins@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, November 14, 2010 1:17:27 PM
Subject: [handcousins] Sent from Snipping Tool [1 Attachment]

 

Norris Hand
5/17/1919  Millville News


#7672 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:40 pm
Subject: Tindall
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Shirley do you still have that article on Richard Tindall? I can't seem to
locate it on the handcousins site and wonder if you could share it again. Hope
you are well. It was fun seeing you and Charlene at Founders Weekend.
Carol

#7673 From: sesenn@...
Date: Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:14 pm
Subject: Re: Tindall
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
Carol     At first I didn't remember what article you were referring to.  Did figure it out by going to Handcousins messages and searched for Richard Tindall.    Messages 7492, 7493 and 7494 refer to Tindall.   When I read the messages I found the article under my Thompson info.
 
I have the three pages in front of me. Don't remember if I sent it to the website or not. Do you want me to scan it and upload or just send it to you.
 
Had a great time in Cape May last Sept. Can't believe it's almost another year.
Shirley

#7674 From: "Carol" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:04 am
Subject: Re: Tindall
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Shirley
Thank  you for looking for the article,. I believe you scanned and sent it. It is a very interesting article and I am particularly interested in it because Richard Tindall's father N.;B Tindall was the minister at the church I attend. If you can scan it again I would appreciate it very much. We are making the plans for next years Founders' Days. A little different format but plenty of lectures to attend. Friday's opening event is shaping up to be a memorable one. I hope you are planning to attend again.
Thank you again and Merry Christmas!
Carol
----- Original Message -----
From: sesenn@...
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Tindall

 

Carol     At first I didn't remember what article you were referring to.  Did figure it out by going to Handcousins messages and searched for Richard Tindall.    Messages 7492, 7493 and 7494 refer to Tindall.   When I read the messages I found the article under my Thompson info.
 
I have the three pages in front of me. Don't remember if I sent it to the website or not. Do you want me to scan it and upload or just send it to you.
 
Had a great time in Cape May last Sept. Can't believe it's almost another year.
Shirley


#7675 From: "txhandcousin" <texaswriter@...>
Date: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:00 pm
Subject: The Greatest Gift of All
txhandcousin
Send Email Send Email
 
Just wanted to wish all my friends a very Merry Christmas.  It was here that I
first found distant cousins who were helpful in my search for information on my
Hand ancestors.  The family members I knew were all gone and I felt a need to
connect with people who are related to me.  The warm welcome from all of you;
even to those to which I was not related, was wonderful.

To fill you in on my progress, I am still finding Hand cousins.  Grandmother
Hand started a reunion for her family in 1905 and it has been held every year
since.  It is the 3rd longest running reunion in the United States.  We have
gone to Alabama to the Veazey family reunion for the past two years and have
plans to attend next year.  I have so many second cousins there.

No longer is there any reason to feel envy when my friends talk about being with
family for holidays and special events.  Thank you all for playing a part in
helping me get started in my genealogy search.  You helped me find the greatest
gift of all------ loving family members I did not know existed!

Thanks for the gift and Happy Holidays!!
Joan Hand Murphy

#7676 From: "txhandcousin" <texaswriter@...>
Date: Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:16 pm
Subject: Re: new member
txhandcousin
Send Email Send Email
 
Hi Yvonne,

I may be able to help if your family truly came from Henry County, Georgia.  I
do know that there was a "scandal" in the Hand family and that a man changed his
name from Hand to Hann because he was so upset with his father.

This would have been a descendant of Joseph (born 1755), and Kizziah Hand.  They
married in Pendleton District, South Carolina and moved to Henry County, Georgia
with their children.  Joseph Hand was given a land grant in GA because he was in
the Revolutionary War.  After Joseph's death, Kizziah and her grown children
moved to the Tallapoosa County, Alabama area.

I am offering this information to give you an area to search but am not certain
that this is a part of your family.  A warning…..During the Civil War, northern
soldiers burned all public buildings in that area of Georgia, destroying all
records.  I have a gap in two branches of my family because they lived in Henry
County prior to 1861.

Also, thisJoseph Hand is not connected to the Long Island Hand family.

Good luck,
Joan Hand Murphy


--- In handcousins@yahoogroups.com, "Carol Boyd" <grantstbeachbum@...> wrote:
>
> You probably have all of this information but here is what I have managed to
find so far.
> 1910 census
> Ellis Hann born 1882 and his wife Mary J. Hann (Mcgill) 1889
> Members of the house hold include Nancy Wilson who is the grandmother.
> Nancy says she is 85 born in 1824 in S.C.
> she states her father' s birth place as USA as well as her mothers. Nancy is a
Widow.I gather that she married a second time to a man who's last name was
Wilson.
> James C Hann born 1843  Georgia must be the son of Nancy Wilson says his
parents were born in S.C. he is widowed
> Carol Boyd
> Cape May, NJ
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Yvonne Cook
>   To: handcousins@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:52 PM
>   Subject: [handcousins] new member
>
>
>
>
>   Hi to all,
>
>   I have been researching my family genealogy for several years now and I am
still having trouble with the Hann (Hand) side.  My grandfather was Ellis Hann
,son of James Canaday Hann.  They lived in Hickman County Tennessee from the
1870's.  Supposedly James came from Henry County, Georgia maybe Walker Co. GA or
maybe Walton Co. GA.!  James fought in the civil war with the TN 26th company H
and enlisted in Knoxville Tn.  Family records state that his father was from
Pendleton, SC.  This is where I am having trouble.  Some family records state
that his father possibly was Lewis (Louis) Hand who was married to Nancy
Bagwell?  I really would like it if I could find this missing link!  Thank you
for allowing me to be a part of your group.
>
>   Sincerely,
>
>   Yvonne Hann Cook
>

#7677 From: "hisdude2004" <pvpreacherman@...>
Date: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:16 am
Subject: Re: The Greatest Gift of All
hisdude2004
Send Email Send Email
 
Joan, I'd like to join you in wishing a very Merry Christmas to all of the
Handcousins. I've not found a lot of connections here, but hope continues to
"spring eternal" and I have found a lot of very gracious folks here (the kind of
people you like to think of as "kin"), and I do enjoy reading about the progress
being made, as well as that being sought. You are certainly one of those
gracious folks, dear heart, and I appreciate you so very much. May G-d bless you
and yours, and may He richly bless all of my extended family here, not just at
this time of the year, but in the year and years to come.Sincerely,Robert Lee
Hand(a middle Tennessee cousin)-------------------------------------- In
handcousins@yahoogroups.com, "txhandcousin" <texaswriter@...> wrote:>> Just
wanted to wish all my friends a very Merry Christmas.  It was here that I first
found distant cousins who were helpful in my search for information on my Hand
ancestors.  The family members I knew were all gone and I felt a need to connect
with people who are related to me.  The warm welcome from all of you; even to
those to which I was not related, was wonderful.> > To fill you in on my
progress, I am still finding Hand cousins.  Grandmother Hand started a reunion
for her family in 1905 and it has been held every year since.  It is the 3rd
longest running reunion in the United States.  We have gone to Alabama to the
Veazey family reunion for the past two years and have plans to attend next year.
I have so many second cousins there.> > No longer is there any reason to feel
envy when my friends talk about being with family for holidays and special
events.  Thank you all for playing a part in helping me get started in my
genealogy search.  You helped me find the greatest gift of all------ loving
family members I did not know existed!> > Thanks for the gift and Happy
Holidays!!> Joan Hand Murphy>

#7678 From: "Bob" <carver@...>
Date: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:34 am
Subject: email trackers.
tobob20002000
Send Email Send Email
 
E-Mail Tracker Programs --
very interesting and a must read!!!
 
I suspect everyone is familiar with snopes.comand/or truthorfiction.com for determining whether information received via email is just that:  true/false or fact/fiction.  Both are excellent sites.
 
Advice from snopes.com   VERY IMPORTANT!!
 
1) Any time you see an email that says "forward this on to '10' (or however many) of your friends", "sign this petition", or "you'll get bad luck" or "you'll get good luck" or "you'll see something funny on your screen after you send it" or whatever --- it almost always has an email tracker program attached that tracks the cookies and emails of those folks you forward to.  The host sender is getting a copy each time it gets forwarded and then is able to get lists of 'active' email addresses to use in SPAM emails or sell to other spammers.  Even when you get emails that demand you send the email on if you're not ashamed of God/Jesus --- that is email tracking, and they are playing on our conscience.  These people don't care how they get your email addresses - just as long as they get them.  Also, emails that talk about a missing child or a child with an incurable disease "how would you feel if that was your child" --- email tracking.  Ignore them and don't participate!

 2) Almost all emails that ask you to add your name and forward on to others are similar to that mass letter years ago that asked people to send business cards to the little kid in Florida who wanted to break the Guinness Book of Records for the most cards.  All it was, and all any of this type of email is, is a way to get names and 'cookie' tracking information for telemarketers and spammers -- to validate active email accounts for their own profitable purposes.
 
You can do your Friends and Family members a GREAT favor by sending this information to them.  You will be providing a service to your friends.  And you will be rewarded by not getting thousands of spam emails in the future!

 Do yourself a favor and STOP adding your name(s) to those types of listing regardless how inviting they might sound! Or make you feel guilty if you don't! It's all about getting email addresses and nothing more.
 
You may think you are supporting a GREAT cause, but you are NOT!
 
Instead, you will be getting tons of junk mail later and very possibly a virus attached
ALSO:  Email petitions are NOT acceptable to Congress of any other organization - i.e. social security, etc.  To be acceptable, petitions must have a "signed signature" and full address of the person signing the petition, so this is a waste of time and you are just helping the email trackers.

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

#7679 From: "arva46" <luvy46@...>
Date: Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:00 am
Subject: Hello
arva46
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello to all from the new "kid" in the group. I'm trying to find any information
anyone might have on Isaac Clinton Hand b-6/16/1884 d-6/2/1955 Damascus,
Washington Co., Va.  He was married to Sally Virginia Barlow and Ada Snyder. 
Any information would be greatly appreciated.

#7680 From: sesenn@...
Date: Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:03 pm
Subject: Hand Coat of Arms
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
Does anyone have any further info on this?  Shirley
 
There was a lot of discussion about the Hand Family Coat Of Arms  at one time?  There was a woman named Alyce Hand that was going to have someone check with the Arms Registry in London to see if a Coat Of Arms had been registered for the Hand Family.  Do you know what happened to that project? 

#7681 From: "Margarette G. Ogle" <mogle11312@...>
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 am
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
mogle29631
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Shirley
I was the one who started it because at the home of the Colonial Dames 17th Century there are a lot of families whose Coats of Arms are hanging.  The Hand family coat is not there.  There was some lady who disagreed that the one which we are using is not the true one.  I just don't argue about something when someone who seems to know more than I do, I drop the subject.  I have the Hand family registered, but have not done anything else.  In order to get another  family approved for the coat in CDXVIIC it has to have been proven through the Society Heraldry chairman.  I still am interested in having it painted as it is and hung at the Society.  I heard from several people who were interested in getting this done.  It costs around $100 for painting, framing and hanging.  I just couldn't afford it by myself. Handcousins arms are the arms of John Hand.  Each coat must go through a bloodline to the person who was awarded the COA.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A NEW YEAR FILLED WITH MUCH HAPPINESS
 
Margarette
----- Original Message -----
From: sesenn@...
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Does anyone have any further info on this?  Shirley
 
There was a lot of discussion about the Hand Family Coat Of Arms  at one time?  There was a woman named Alyce Hand that was going to have someone check with the Arms Registry in London to see if a Coat Of Arms had been registered for the Hand Family.  Do you know what happened to that project? 


#7682 From: "Carol Boyd" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 3:20 am
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Margarette,
I will be happy to contribute my share to have the Hand coat of arms approval. If all of us contribute it won't cost anyone of us much at all. It should be a lot easier to have it researched now that we have Steven Hand,s will and can prove it as far back as him.
Carol Boyd
Cape May, NJ
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Dear Shirley
I was the one who started it because at the home of the Colonial Dames 17th Century there are a lot of families whose Coats of Arms are hanging.  The Hand family coat is not there.  There was some lady who disagreed that the one which we are using is not the true one.  I just don't argue about something when someone who seems to know more than I do, I drop the subject.  I have the Hand family registered, but have not done anything else.  In order to get another  family approved for the coat in CDXVIIC it has to have been proven through the Society Heraldry chairman.  I still am interested in having it painted as it is and hung at the Society.  I heard from several people who were interested in getting this done.  It costs around $100 for painting, framing and hanging.  I just couldn't afford it by myself. Handcousins arms are the arms of John Hand.  Each coat must go through a bloodline to the person who was awarded the COA.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A NEW YEAR FILLED WITH MUCH HAPPINESS
 
Margarette
----- Original Message -----
From: sesenn@...
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Does anyone have any further info on this?  Shirley
 
There was a lot of discussion about the Hand Family Coat Of Arms  at one time?  There was a woman named Alyce Hand that was going to have someone check with the Arms Registry in London to see if a Coat Of Arms had been registered for the Hand Family.  Do you know what happened to that project? 


#7683 From: "Margarette G. Ogle" <mogle11312@...>
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:05 am
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
mogle29631
Send Email Send Email
 
I have my line proved and signed, but never did get it painted and framed.  It is back to John so I could get it because I have all the papers, Just not the money at the time.  I think it would be wonderful if we got it and had it hung.  I forgot which room they are in.  Had the Ogle one painted and framed, but didn't pay to get another one for headquarters to have.  Of, course I would contribute if we could get the money I think it would be a nice thing to do.'
Margarette
----- Original Message -----
From: Carol Boyd
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Margarette,
I will be happy to contribute my share to have the Hand coat of arms approval. If all of us contribute it won't cost anyone of us much at all. It should be a lot easier to have it researched now that we have Steven Hand,s will and can prove it as far back as him.
Carol Boyd
Cape May, NJ
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Dear Shirley
I was the one who started it because at the home of the Colonial Dames 17th Century there are a lot of families whose Coats of Arms are hanging.  The Hand family coat is not there.  There was some lady who disagreed that the one which we are using is not the true one.  I just don't argue about something when someone who seems to know more than I do, I drop the subject.  I have the Hand family registered, but have not done anything else.  In order to get another  family approved for the coat in CDXVIIC it has to have been proven through the Society Heraldry chairman.  I still am interested in having it painted as it is and hung at the Society.  I heard from several people who were interested in getting this done.  It costs around $100 for painting, framing and hanging.  I just couldn't afford it by myself. Handcousins arms are the arms of John Hand.  Each coat must go through a bloodline to the person who was awarded the COA.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A NEW YEAR FILLED WITH MUCH HAPPINESS
 
Margarette
----- Original Message -----
From: sesenn@...
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Does anyone have any further info on this?  Shirley
 
There was a lot of discussion about the Hand Family Coat Of Arms  at one time?  There was a woman named Alyce Hand that was going to have someone check with the Arms Registry in London to see if a Coat Of Arms had been registered for the Hand Family.  Do you know what happened to that project? 


#7684 From: Paul Thorn <p_aculeius@...>
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:22 pm
Subject: RE: Hand Coat of Arms
p_aculeius
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Cousins,

The real problem with researching coats of arms is that a great many unrelated people share the same names.  During the early 17th Century, when our Hand family appears in Kent, pretty much the only people who were entitled to bear arms were the nobility; that is, the descendants of the feudal lords who held most of the land in England.  This was a tiny minority of the entire population.  Even the feudal knights and their descendants tended to be quite wealthy compared with the typical Englishman.

Later on, as economic forces became as important as ancient bloodlines, the very wealthy began to obtain arms through patents, and during this period coats of arms became more widespread, although they still didn't represent more than a small minority of all Englishmen.  The chief difference is that a great many more names became associated with arms.

But the most important thing is that unless Steven Hand was himself an armiger, there can be no coat of arms associated with our Hand family without a new grant being made retroactively to him or his son, John, which is extremely unlikely after nearly four hundred years.  If there were an incorporated Hand family association in Britain, of which we were a part, perhaps that could petition for a coat of arms (rather expensive), but they would have no historical authenticity, and of course the design would be up to the College of Arms, although the association could make suggestions.  Of course, we're not an incorporated society in Britain, and if we tried to become one (an extremely complex and expensive prospect), the odds are high that within a few years the society would disincorporate, and any right to its arms would lapse.

Steven Hand was, by all accounts, a glover; a craftsman who probably lived in town and didn't own any land to speak of.  There's no reason to believe he was descended from knights or lords, and no evidence that he was even related to someone named Hand who was an armiger.  We don't know when any arms associated with the name were granted, but unless they were granted to somebody living in Kent in the centuries before Steven Hand would have been born, the odds are very high that they have nothing whatever to do with us.  It would be wonderful if it turned out that he were descended from knights or lords, but there's no shame in admitting that he was probably just a commoner, an artisan who worked at his trade in order to support his family, and had no pretence of nobility.

Paul


To: handcousins@yahoogroups.com
From: grantstbeachbum@...
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:20:25 -0500
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Margarette,
I will be happy to contribute my share to have the Hand coat of arms approval. If all of us contribute it won't cost anyone of us much at all. It should be a lot easier to have it researched now that we have Steven Hand,s will and can prove it as far back as him.
Carol Boyd
Cape May, NJ
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Dear Shirley
I was the one who started it because at the home of the Colonial Dames 17th Century there are a lot of families whose Coats of Arms are hanging.  The Hand family coat is not there.  There was some lady who disagreed that the one which we are using is not the true one.  I just don't argue about something when someone who seems to know more than I do, I drop the subject.  I have the Hand family registered, but have not done anything else.  In order to get another  family approved for the coat in CDXVIIC it has to have been proven through the Society Heraldry chairman.  I still am interested in having it painted as it is and hung at the Society.  I heard from several people who were interested in getting this done.  It costs around $100 for painting, framing and hanging.  I just couldn't afford it by myself. Handcousins arms are the arms of John Hand.  Each coat must go through a bloodline to the person who was awarded the COA.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A NEW YEAR FILLED WITH MUCH HAPPINESS
 
Margarette
----- Original Message -----
From: sesenn@...
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:03 PM
Subject: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Does anyone have any further info on this?  Shirley
 
There was a lot of discussion about the Hand Family Coat Of Arms  at one time?  There was a woman named Alyce Hand that was going to have someone check with the Arms Registry in London to see if a Coat Of Arms had been registered for the Hand Family.  Do you know what happened to that project? 




#7685 From: sesenn@...
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:41 pm
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
This page came from "Complete American Armoury and Blue Book" by John Matthews. It's in the ADD section in the back of the book
 
You can search the book on line.

#7686 From: sesenn@...
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 6:54 pm
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
Found this under Crozer's General Armory p 66
 
 

#7687 From: sesenn@...
Date: Wed Dec 22, 2010 8:53 pm
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
 
 
 
Found this under Crozer's General Armory
 
 

#7688 From: sesenn@...
Date: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:09 am
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
shirl336
Send Email Send Email
 
Margarette  I don't know anything about the Home of Colonial Dames 17th Century and having paintings of Coat of Arms on the walls. What did you have to do to be registered?
 
Could you explain this a little for me and any other cousins who aren't familiar with it.
 We can discuss this further after the holidays. It was good to hear from you.
 
Merry Christmas and A Happy New Year
Shirley
 

#7689 From: Paul Thorn <p_aculeius@...>
Date: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:11 am
Subject: RE: Hand Coat of Arms
p_aculeius
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Cousins,

"Crozier's General Armory" is not a valid source of authority for anyone to bear arms.  There are several reasons for this.

First, the authority for these arms would be the College of Arms, in England, whose authority derives from the Sovereign.  In order for a coat of arms to be valid, they would either have to be conferred or confirmed by the College of Arms.  There would be a grant and a record of that grant.  In all countries, the authority for arms comes from the state.  The United States, however, has no governing heraldic authority; only self-appointed heraldic societies.  Americans may petition the College of Arms for a new grant of arms if they can prove descent from a British subject, which we clearly can.  But there would still have to be a grant of arms.  Here there isn't any evidence of one.

Second, Crozier doesn't provide any source, other than a blanket assurance in the introduction to the entire volume that "actual examination of the necessary records has shown the family to be entitled to the distinction."  However, on the preceding pages, Crozier provides various rationalizations for accepting arms without any authority whatsoever, claiming that the reason why so few families in America could prove the right to arms is because their records had been lost due to time and wars.

He then rationalizes the inclusion of arms on the grounds that the Garter King of Arms in 1688 explained the criteria he was then applying for approving arms not previously granted or recorded on the grounds of ancient usage.  He said that if arms had been in continuous use for over a century or at least three generations, he would approve them.  Crozier misrepresents this as the current state of Heraldic law, which it is not.  Applying his logic, any American family could claim the right to bear arms simply by claiming them continuously for three generations.  That doesn't necessarily mean that the arms were borne for a long time; a father, son, and grandson could satisfy this requirement in one day.

The entry under "Hand" cites John Hand as the source of the arms, even though there is no evidence that he ever received a grant of arms.  From the way that the entry is written, it looks to me as though some member of the Hand family submitted a coat of arms found elsewhere, asserting that they had belonged to John Hand two hundred years earlier, since he was obviously a member of the Hand family and those were the Hand family arms.  This satisfied Crozier's criteria for inclusion in the book.  If there had been any actual proof of entitlement, it could have been included in the book, but it wasn't.

I'm afraid that "Crozier's General Armory" falls under the heading of "bad genealogy."  It's essentially an unsourced compendium of materials that must be used by hundreds of families to justify bearing arms that have nothing to do with them.  It was printed because families all over the country wanted to believe that they were descended from noble English families, not commoners; and it has no more validity than any of the modern web sites that purport to sell people various documents about their family history and arms.

Right now we have no evidence tying these arms to anybody living in Kent at or before the time of John Hand or Steven Hand.  There's no reason to believe that either of them belonged to the nobility or had enough money to petition for a grant of arms, which then as now was an expensive prospect.  One of the main reasons why coats of arms had to be registered is because they could be taxed; they were something that, for the most part, only the very wealthy possessed.  Not, for the most part, craftsmen earning their living by a trade in a rural village.

Perhaps the best way to clear up this confusion would be to ask the College of Arms whose arms those really are, to whom they were granted, and when.  Whether they'll reply to such a request is another matter.  But there should be a record, and that ought to settle the issue.

Paul


To: handcousins@yahoogroups.com
From: sesenn@...
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:53:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 
 
 
Found this under Crozer's General Armory
 
 

#7690 From: "Carol Boyd" <grantstbeachbum@...>
Date: Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:45 pm
Subject: Re: Hand Coat of Arms
carolboyd08204
Send Email Send Email
 
Paul,
Thank you for your information concerning this matter. We definitely prefer our genealogy and anything connected with it to be genuine. We have worked to many years to make our genealogy a true picture of what was not what we wish it to be. After the first of the year I will look into contacting the College of Arms about this matter. We know from Steven's will had owned land however, it doesn't look as though it was a huge amount. I am wondering about the Gransden line. He was a large land owner and considering the will he left he was a man of considerable means. Our cousins might want to check out that line. A number of years ago I found an interesting site concerning him, however, I don't know where it was anymore. Thank you again. I know your profession has given you a great insight into these matters.
Carol Boyd
Cape May, NJ
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Thorn
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:11 PM
Subject: RE: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 

Dear Cousins,


"Crozier's General Armory" is not a valid source of authority for anyone to bear arms.  There are several reasons for this.

First, the authority for these arms would be the College of Arms, in England, whose authority derives from the Sovereign.  In order for a coat of arms to be valid, they would either have to be conferred or confirmed by the College of Arms.  There would be a grant and a record of that grant.  In all countries, the authority for arms comes from the state.  The United States, however, has no governing heraldic authority; only self-appointed heraldic societies.  Americans may petition the College of Arms for a new grant of arms if they can prove descent from a British subject, which we clearly can.  But there would still have to be a grant of arms.  Here there isn't any evidence of one.

Second, Crozier doesn't provide any source, other than a blanket assurance in the introduction to the entire volume that "actual examination of the necessary records has shown the family to be entitled to the distinction."  However, on the preceding pages, Crozier provides various rationalizations for accepting arms without any authority whatsoever, claiming that the reason why so few families in America could prove the right to arms is because their records had been lost due to time and wars.

He then rationalizes the inclusion of arms on the grounds that the Garter King of Arms in 1688 explained the criteria he was then applying for approving arms not previously granted or recorded on the grounds of ancient usage.  He said that if arms had been in continuous use for over a century or at least three generations, he would approve them.  Crozier misrepresents this as the current state of Heraldic law, which it is not.  Applying his logic, any American family could claim the right to bear arms simply by claiming them continuously for three generations.  That doesn't necessarily mean that the arms were borne for a long time; a father, son, and grandson could satisfy this requirement in one day.

The entry under "Hand" cites John Hand as the source of the arms, even though there is no evidence that he ever received a grant of arms.  From the way that the entry is written, it looks to me as though some member of the Hand family submitted a coat of arms found elsewhere, asserting that they had belonged to John Hand two hundred years earlier, since he was obviously a member of the Hand family and those were the Hand family arms.  This satisfied Crozier's criteria for inclusion in the book.  If there had been any actual proof of entitlement, it could have been included in the book, but it wasn't.

I'm afraid that "Crozier's General Armory" falls under the heading of "bad genealogy."  It's essentially an unsourced compendium of materials that must be used by hundreds of families to justify bearing arms that have nothing to do with them.  It was printed because families all over the country wanted to believe that they were descended from noble English families, not commoners; and it has no more validity than any of the modern web sites that purport to sell people various documents about their family history and arms.

Right now we have no evidence tying these arms to anybody living in Kent at or before the time of John Hand or Steven Hand.  There's no reason to believe that either of them belonged to the nobility or had enough money to petition for a grant of arms, which then as now was an expensive prospect.  One of the main reasons why coats of arms had to be registered is because they could be taxed; they were something that, for the most part, only the very wealthy possessed.  Not, for the most part, craftsmen earning their living by a trade in a rural village.

Perhaps the best way to clear up this confusion would be to ask the College of Arms whose arms those really are, to whom they were granted, and when.  Whether they'll reply to such a request is another matter.  But there should be a record, and that ought to settle the issue.

Paul


To: handcousins@yahoogroups.com
From: sesenn@...
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:53:40 -0500
Subject: Re: [handcousins] Hand Coat of Arms

 
 
 
Found this under Crozer's General Armory
 
 


#7691 From: "rlhand1" <rlhand1@...>
Date: Sat Jan 1, 2011 11:28 pm
Subject: Hands in Northern Michigan
rlhand1
Send Email Send Email
 
Looking for family link to midwestern Hand (IL and possibly IN).  My father is
Millard Logan Hand and grandfather is Millard Robert Hand however went by
Robert.
Grandfather was born in IL and moved to MI.  Any help would be greatly
appreciated!

#7692 From: "jaymthomp" <jaydarlene@...>
Date: Mon Jan 3, 2011 5:43 am
Subject: Re: Hands in Northern Michigan
jaymthomp
Send Email Send Email
 
--- In handcousins@yahoogroups.com, "rlhand1" <rlhand1@...> wrote:
>
> Looking for family link to midwestern Hand (IL and possibly IN).  My father is
Millard Logan Hand and grandfather is Millard Robert Hand however went by
Robert.
> Grandfather was born in IL and moved to MI.  Any help would be greatly
appreciated!
>
I am an Indiana Hand. Or my mother was. After a couple of day's checking I think
I have your line back to John "the immigrant" pretty well established. If you
contact me off list I can send you what I have.
Jay Thompson

Messages 7663 - 7692 of 8455   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines NEW - Help