Consequences of Nuking Mecca

By: Vernon Richards, author of `Islam Undressed`

Because a war of attrition heavily favors their ultimate
goals, Islamist terrorists have so far not been deterred by large
numbers of their young men being killed. Life is cheap to them, even
their own, and so they remain unmoved by their losses and still lust
for power through murder. Their grass-roots support base, hundreds of
millions world-wide, can still be counted on to largely support their
efforts, even if only passively. If sufficiently humbled, then at some
point the majority of Muslims might yet choose to abandon violence and
stop their sons, or at least temporarily withdraw their jihadist
forces to established realms of influence (just as the Turkish hordes
did after being soundly defeated by the Polish cavalry). But any
decision to withdraw will not come by either negotiation or
accommodation, but only through abject humiliation and defeat. What
form of defeat will suffice to convince Islam to put the Jihad genie
back in the bottle is a subject of widespread debate. Pacifists
blithely claim more therapy, understanding, and multiculturalism is
the way, and will likely continue to spout such nonsense right up
until the Halal knife slices their throat. They congratulate
themselves for being so open-minded, oblivious that their brains have
fallen out. Happily self-blinded by excessive relativism, they can no
longer distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, or dark from light.

Those more personally touched by Islamic methods, and with
the ability to realize you cannot create sweets from bile, often
prefer methods of `total war'. Our enemies remain free to plan and
perpetrate never-ending acts of total war designed to destroy the very
fabric of our society. Failure to respond with even greater
destructiveness can only serve to prolong this struggle. In any
contest, the first rule of victory is to fight on your own terms and
not your opponents. In any violent struggle, victory goes to the most
ferocious and skilled. As Patton said, let the other poor bastard die
for his country, our objective is to fight and win. We must fight with
more energy, more cunning, more intelligence, and more ferocity than
the cunning animals seeking our demise. It is simply suicidal to
refuse to fight a people and culture who are motivated, mobilized, and
pledged to destroy you. The true terrorists, the men and nations
brainwashing, supplying, and ordering terrorist attacks, would prefer
they remain unmolested. In this contest stacked against us, they are
quite happy to let us use our police, military, and intelligence to
play cat-and-mouse with their endless supply of terrorist
foot-soldiers. In this war, victory will go to the party most
effective in convincing the opposing party that surrender is
preferable to a continuation of hostilities, and so victory will
remain out of reach to us as long as the enablers and handlers remain
safe. Muslim survivalists will only force the end to the terrorist
activities springing up from amongst them when made to pay a terrible
price. One `terrible price' currently under debate is an nuclear
attack on Mecca should any 9/11 scale attack (or larger) occur on US
soil. I am in favor of such planning in the event of a catastrophic
strike against America, because I believe the burden of loss needs to
be shifted decidedly to fundamental Muslims themselves (and what they
value most) if there is to be any hope of ending all this madness. To
yield to Islamists demands and take the option off the table would be
strategically stupid. Unfortunately, the only thing insanity respects
is greater insanity.

But as has been pointed out by Robert Spencer, Nuking
Mecca could be seen by Islamists as a weak action and could serve to
unify Muslims and increase Jihad. But this is only true if not done
properly and the city is left salvageable within a few years. Once
devoted Muslims carry out their next major strike on America, the
Mecca plan should be carried out without hesitation or warning. No
Hiroshima class atomic wimp-weapon will do, only the 1,000 times more
powerful hydrogen fusion device will work for this important job. To
be done correctly, a grid of 9 of our most powerful Hydrogen bombs
(3x3, every 12 miles, the black stone at the center) are set off at
the surface to be as dirty as possible, rendering the entire region
uninhabitable for the next few decades. The strike is then repeated
every 5 years or so if any kind of clean-up is attempted. Medina needs
one too, to prevent Arabs from declaring the transference of the holy
site to the secondary location, but Mecca needs to be thoroughly
`glassified'.

Muslims will thereby learn by force-feeding that their
hateful God (Allah) cannot protect them and is a figment of their
collective imagination, and millions will leave the failed cult.
Nothing harms an Arab more than humiliation and defeat. They sincerely
believe that their most-powerful Allah has promised to protect and
preserve Mecca, and so their false faith in the Pagan deity will
crumble with the meteorite in the intense heat and pressure of a
fusion fireball. Can a billion Moslems worldwide face radioactive
glass 5 times a day and still take it seriously, I don't think so, or
at least not over the long term. Cut off the head and the snake will
still squirm wildly for a while, but it will soon stop. In addition,
by preventing Muslims from -ever- performing one of the pillars
(requirements) of Islam, we block their way to paradise, but thereby
actually save them from real hell (Islam is hell-on-earth is this
life, and brings only sorrow and torment in the next). When the time
comes, by all means, Nuke Mecca, …but do it right. By this act, and
this act alone, many intelligent Arabs, Persians, Egyptians, and
Asians will stop their foolish ideas of superiority, and so curb their
sanctimonious rationales to commit hateful acts of murder, rape,
slavery, and violence. Domestic Muslims will need to be controlled for
a while, with heavy doses of education and trauma therapy applied. If
they can commit to opposing Muhammad and his methods, then in a
generation or two Islamic nonsense will not be worshiped by their
children. If they can make no such binding commitment, then
deportation is in order. As Hiroshima saved more lives than it took 60
years ago, so will thoroughly nuking Islamic sites save more lives
than will be taken otherwise, including possibly yours, mine, and your
children and my children.

While we all hope such measures are unnecessary, to fail
to plan for that eventuality is to plan to fail. If we were to Nuke
major cities in Iran and Syria, the root of Islam in Mecca would
remain and worldwide faith in Muhammad and his vile methods would be
strengthened instead of weakened. Such a weak act would embolden the
movement and the gains in destroying America would be perceived as
well worth the cost. In the mean time, while we all await for the
rumored catastrophe, a concerted effort to supply Persians with the
means and weapons to overthrow the Mullahs is urgently needed in Iran.
Our Persian allies in this effort need to understand that should they
fail, they will likely die with the Mullahs in the inevitable nuclear
storm which will otherwise follow. The Kurds of northern Syria are
also salvageable, but there is hardly anything else worth preserving
in Syria. As I have been informed by Arabs in Jordan and Lebanon,
Syrians are not to be trusted, and for reason.