--- In ontheoriginofspecies@y..., tarh7777 <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> ---
> I understand that the evidence is that the universe is expanding but
> the point I was trying to make was that it did have a starting point
> which I understand was about 35 billion years ago. At that time the
> universe started as a single point and of infinite temperature and
> mass in the middle of nothing. It has been expanding ever since.
> What existed prior to BB, who knows, but nothing crossed the line (or
> point) separating the time before and the time after BB. It is thus
> the beginning of everything with our universe and as far as we are
> concerned nothing existed prior to it. I think we are agreeing quite
> abit here.
According to the Big Bang Theory, as well as Relativity, time is a
dimension like the other spatial dimensions, such that the singularity
that expanded into our universe was originally dimensionless with
regard to time. If time has no dimension, it is unmeasurable;
therefore, there can be no "before" the Big Bang, because before is a
relative measure of time and implies dimensionality to something that
is dimensionless.
... I understand that the evidence is that the universe is expanding but the point I was trying to make was that it did have a starting point which I...
... According to the Big Bang Theory, as well as Relativity, time is a dimension like the other spatial dimensions, such that the singularity that expanded...
... that ... came ... existed " ... this ... of ... How do you mean "re-consideration of the 2nd law"? If you are concerned with there continuing to be order...
... I have pored over my thermodynamics texts and can't find any of the above mentioned equations with regard to Entropy or the 2nd Law. For that matter, I...
... infinity ... randomness ... the ... = ... power ... any ... the ... For ... that ... order ... getting ... numbers; ... order. ... produce ... it ... of ...
... I think it's important to distinguish the time arrow and entropy from our perceptions about disorder. For Hawking's one broken coffee cup, I could give...
... universe ... and ... a ... universe ... is ... reference. ... as ... from ... cup, I ... humans ... fusion. ... dense ... of ... into a ... sodium ... ...
... So, in other words, the time arrow is along ever increasing complexity in the universe. This, I think, matches with the examples I've given, that while...
... used ... complexity ... given, ... complex. ... implying ... as "energy ... being ... The caveat is of course very true ,I'd guess, so long as there is ...
... I'd say you're mostly correct, with the exception that it would be more accurate to say that the input energy is greater than the AVAILABLE output, since...
... the ... in ... produced ... THAT ... more ... it's ... that ... than ... reverse ... 0. ... and ... = "entropy". ... heat by ... agent." ... cycle, ... it ...
... in ... This is due to the fact that no machine works at 1oo% efficiency! When Sysi pushes the rock, he well undoubtedly waste energy in tripping over a...
... universe ... and ... a ... universe ... is ... reference. ... as ... from ... cup, I ... humans ... fusion. ... dense ... of ... into a ... sodium ... ...
... infinity ... randomness ... the ... = ... power ... any ... the ... For ... that ... Of course not! Randomness is not a rigorous concept! But if you ...
... The point I was trying to make was that Entropy and randomness are NOT the same thing. Entropy is a state function defined by dS = dQ/T, it is not some...
... infinity ... randomness ... the ... = ... power ... any ... the ... For ... that ... order ... getting ... numbers; ... order. ... produce ... I am not...
Sorry, I got my wires crossed. It was that guy chafihar. <br><br>But I disagree:<br><br>"If it is being carried out by beings - alien or otherwise - that exist...