Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ontheoriginofspecies · On the Origin of Species - DARWINIAN EVOLUTION, PALEONTOLOGY, ARCHEOLOGY
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: [On the Origin of Species] A potential best seller.   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1169 of 7040 |
Re: [On the Origin of Species] A potential best seller.


Plate tectonics could never change the structure of the planet. It
requires such tremendous force that something else must be the cause
for such large exchanges. (which of course a meteor could be a great
possiblity ,,but not necessarily true).

Plate Tectonics may change the surface area of the same locality but
not anymore,, or else we'll have such great earthquakes that'll
probably lasting a few hours continuingly rather than seconds. And so
plate tectonics only quiver the structure but never sail it along
like a ship. A quiver of a pudding could never change it's mass into
a cake.

Selflogy.








--- In ontheoriginofspecies@y..., "Jack Kilmon" <jkilmon@h...> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "selflogy" <selflogy@y...>
> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@y...>
> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:28 AM
> Subject: [On the Origin of Species] A potential best seller.
>
>
> > In the beginning of time, the planet was of a different form. In
that
> > form,,the dinos were in favourable conditions. Then the form
changed.
> > It was then that they perished.
> > I am looking for a publisher if not a producer for this block
buster
> > to give to the world what form this planet was in before the time
of
> > the dinos.
>
> In the "beginning of time" this planet was not here. It was not
formed for
> some 11 billion years AFTER the "beginning of time" (Big Bang) and
the
> dinosaurs did not come along until the earth had already existed
for over
> 4.3 billion years. Although plate tectonics has changed the
surface of the
> earth, the form of the earth has not changed. Good luck on finding
a
> publisher.
>
>
> Jack




Tue Apr 2, 2002 2:43 am

selflogy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1169 of 7040 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Jack, No need to go back so far. The formation of the planet at that "phase" were conducive to the development of the dinos and their tremendous growth. The...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2002
1:35 am

Plate tectonics could never change the structure of the planet. It requires such tremendous force that something else must be the cause for such large...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2002
2:43 am

... cause ... great ... but ... Partially true! The duration of a simple vibrating system is independent of the initial amplitude! So your statement is not...
chafihar
Offline
Apr 3, 2002
4:26 am

... It ... true, ... thing ... wrong! ... I think there is some confusion here. I did not say that duration is but will have to be. Gary. ... it ... not ... ...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
4:56 am

Charles, Maybe you have misconstrued certain parts of the topic. Let me give you the summary. Jack was indicating plate tectonics changed the surface of the...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
5:17 am

Cont... Of course plate tectonics are supposed to be slow movements of the land mass taking millions/billions of years for the continental drifts. However, I...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
5:27 am

cont... So if we come back to the main subject, we are discussing about the "form" of the planet prior to the emergence and demise of the dinos. Whether you...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
5:31 am

... Earth. ... of ... or ... Yes, I understand! My analysis considered that the Earth's surface remained solid a reasonable distance from the point of impact!...
chafihar
Offline
Apr 7, 2002
9:53 pm

Not true. The largest animal that has ever lived is alive today. Jack ... From: "selflogy" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> ...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2002
6:41 am

I'm talking about land based creatures. Jack Kilmon <jkilmon@...> wrote: Not true. The largest animal that has ever lived is alive today. Jack ... ...
selflogy gary
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2002
7:08 am

Gary, this is starting to sound like twilight zone stuff so as not to rush to judgement on your hypothesis, perhaps you should give us a more detailed ...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 2, 2002
2:51 pm

No, this is not twilight zone stuff but an important "finding". But why waste it on a trivial post when one could write a book about it and perhaps win a Nobel...
selflogy gary
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
2:07 am

uh huh J. ... From: "selflogy gary" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [On the...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
5:31 pm

... From: "selflogy" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:27 PM Subject: Re: [On the Origin of...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
6:27 pm

... From: "selflogy" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:31 PM Subject: Re: [On the Origin of...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 3, 2002
6:30 pm

Yeah, but Jack, I'm talking about precambrian. Timespan during such ages takes "ages" to form but the sudden change is not a "form". Selflogy. ... Million...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2002
2:31 am

... From: "selflogy" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [On the Origin of...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2002
4:50 am

... change ... trying to say ... The planet during that "time" was not exactly how we comprehend it currently. Its makeup and configuration is totally...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2002
5:01 am

... From: "selflogy" <selflogy@...> To: <ontheoriginofspecies@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [On the Origin of...
Jack Kilmon
jkilmon_2000
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2002
5:21 am

... today? ... eighths of the ... (4B to ... It has to be even prior to 4.6 billion. But that's not the point. The "form" completes itself until the sudden...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 4, 2002
5:44 am

... I don't mean to step on Jack's toes here, but I think we've all been following along with the, er, discussion. There are no dinosaurian fossils in strata...
this_science_guy
this_science...
Offline
Apr 4, 2002
3:21 pm

... caused ... be ... been ... event ... I don't think you read me right. I said that the formation of the "form" took place much earlier than 4.6 but an event...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 5, 2002
2:33 am

The Cretaceous extinction was when the "collapse" of the "form" took place. The change in the overall climatic conditions lasted till present time. So we have...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 5, 2002
9:08 am

... took ... before ... did ... much ... This is highly unlikely, in my opinion, for the following reasons! A collision of two bodies has to conserve the...
chafihar
Offline
Apr 7, 2002
11:50 pm

... Alright, so if the "collapse" of the "form" didn't occur until 65 Ma, then what caused the much greater P/T extinction around 250 Ma? Also a side note: You...
this_science_guy
this_science...
Offline
Apr 5, 2002
3:43 pm

Europa seemed to be icey?? Inconclusive proof they are ice and therefore water?? Try to define things nearer to home and what at hand rather than presumption...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2002
6:18 am

And also do not confused the issues. The final "collapse" complately wiped them out. Maybe I'll go skathink instead. ... <no_reply@y...> ... Permian- ... ...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2002
6:30 am

You're right, the surface of the earth is approximately 70% water. However, you said that plate tectonics wasn't that important because it only changed the...
tigerceratops
Offline Send Email
Apr 6, 2002
5:16 pm

Of course it is necesary to begin at the atmospheric level of the planet. Perhaps one might even begin to bacteriarise the oxygenial levels. The difference...
selflogy
Offline Send Email
Apr 7, 2002
12:39 am

... So is all of this just a reiteration of the "Snowball Earth" theory? http://archive.newscientist.com/archive.jsp?id=22115000 If so, I think you've already...
this_science_guy
this_science...
Offline
Apr 6, 2002
6:47 pm
 First  |  |  Last 
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help