9) Why do you keep posting articles -----, when you have been told time & again that it was NOT the scientists who perpetrated these hoaxes? MIT professor...
... it, ... too ... any ... the ... are ... leave ... factual ... deeper ... Steve: Yeah, it seems We might be, depending on how well what You call evolution...
... Tin: Robert do you only cut and paste crap written by others or can you actually address real scientific issues ? Here's one. Question for Robert...
... From: Iam_sweet <iam_sweet@...> Sent: Oct 30, 2005 6:28 PM To: theevolutiondeceit@yahoogroups.com Subject: The Evolution Deceit Re: The Intelligent...
... told time & again that it was NOT the scientists who perpetrated these hoaxes? ... NewScientist.com news service Eugenie Samuel Reich, Boston ... ...
... for ... power ... the ... the ... planet ... presence, ... be ... source, ... admit ... =============================================================== ...
... an ... of ... much ... of ... that ... science, ... much ... great ... this ... alone ... God, ... in ... gut ... But ... the ... it ... as ... finite ... ...
... There ... got it ... tuning ... water, ... deity ... in ... for ... power ... the ... the ... reason" ... provisions ... micromanages ... planet ... Why ...
... by ... is ... observation, ... theories ... of ... embodiment ... ever ... of ... and ... to ... upon ... ontological ... too ... that, ... is ... or ... ...
... ===================================================== What does the fossil record actually show? The Bulletin of Chicago's Field Museum of Natural History...
... Tin: Your first error is to confuse the amount of information with the identification of design. whould be ... source, ... Tin: SETI has articulated a...
... behavior ... there ... existence ... in ... contemplation ... and ... how ... any ... occur ... is ... finite ... extent ... too ... but ... that ... the ...
... Tin: So once again Robert has shown that he is incompetent to address the question asked and instead has chose to hide behind junk articles written by...
... Actually, there are criteria for judging whethere something is the product of design, irreducible complexity being one of them. Why people contunually...
... to ... and ... but ... flesh ... by ... or ... there ... gaze ... science. ... as ... the ... pantheistic, ... right ... world's ... detailed ... organic ...
... Why is "irreducible complexity" a criterion for intelligent design? I mean a balancing rock is "irreducibly complex" in that the tiniest push will throw...
... declaration, "gee, ... Tin: Scientists have already worked out plausible evolutionary pathways for all IC systems, making them utterly worthless as an ...
Steve Wilson wrote: Steve: We participate in what some want to call evolution and others call creation in all that We are. What ever is happening gathers Us ...
... A balanced rock has no use. Funtionality is the key. Why do you obfuscate? ... Yes, the fragility of system is no sign it appeared all at once, but, ...
... No, they have not; however, they HAVE managed to create some halfway interesting fictional pathways based upon the firm premise: "Hey, guys, it just sorta...
... so irreducible complexity *by itself* is not a criteria for intelligent design. *Functionality* must also be present? ... no, its simplicity makes it...
... others ... that ... profoundly ... the ... a ... Steven: Yes, I agree it may be, but it is not beyond the ontological considerations We need to take into...
... actually all they have to do is see if some protein has a similar function to some other protein. They can do that. Creationists don't do that kind of...
Hi Silk here: Lets take a moment to reflect upon "Causa Sui" ............... As to what might Not happen after death.. well.. I once had surgery on my back &...
Silk
silkvain@...
Nov 28, 2005 12:28 pm
8010
Your red blood cells are manufactured in your bone marrow. Once a new cell enters your bloodstream, it may circulate through your heart and body more than...
