From: President, USA Exile Govt. [mailto:prez@...
Sent: 15 April 2003 15:40
To: President, USA Exile Govt.
Subject: URGENT: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
+ Free Americans Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses +
April 15, 2003
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
What follows is an especially valuable
compendium of 9-11 information. It probably
has more long-term value than anything else
I've ever mailed you.
I totally agree with the statement below that
"the break-through point is to inform Americans
that 9-11 is a big lie."
It seems to me that if we can't convince a
majority of Americans that 9-11 was a Bush-Junta
conspiracy, we then stand almost no chance of
dealing successfully with the Fourth Reich's
current dreadful momentum.
The strategy suggested below---joining
discussions groups, etc.---is a wise one.
I encourage you to donate as much time
as you can to this matter.
Yours for all species,
Keith Lampe, Ponderosa Pine
From: "World-Action" <michael@...
Date: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:21:48 AM Asia/Bangkok
To: "[A] WORLD-ACTION" <michael@...
Subject: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
A NOTE FROM WORLD-ACTION:
If you really want to start saving life on Earth,
join more INTERNET GROUPS and disperse
information on THE TRUTH OF 9-11 to people
who don't know. If the truth had come out on
9-11, there would be no gross interferences
with civil liberties in the USA and UK; and NO
invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
If you really want to save life on Earth --
IT IS TIME TO GET DOWN TO SOME WORK:
INFORM OTHER PEOPLE REGARDING 9-11.
YAHOO has MILLIONS of discussion/news
groups to join: http://groups.yahoo.com
As it is bandied about that most Americans
supported the attack on Iraq, the break-through
point is to inform Americans that 9-11 is a big lie.
So that we stop world conquest and domination
in its tracks. If people really want to save their
world, they should join more and more 'discussion
groups' on the Internet - on ANY subject
(bee-keeping, car maintenance, etc.) and get
the members REAL information on 9-11.
YAHOO has MILLIONS of discussion/news
groups to join: http://groups.yahoo.com
This is the simple way to get millions
more Americans thinking.
The truth about Sept 11
The following links are collected by an earth
citizen, Gerard Holmgren, who wants the truth
to come out on September 11 events. He doesn't
have a web site and posts his link on forums,
to mailing lists. I saved his message in html
and give it here.
List of links to documented evidence of high
level US complicity in the attacks of Sept 11 2001.
(The Web pages below have been backed up.
If any links are dead, the backed up page can
be mailed on request.)
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Section 1: Airforce stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the
media that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept
the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as
the following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story --
Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,
Research & documentation
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11, they just
" arrived late "
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,
12 Dec 2001
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray
aircraft is a routine procedure. It happened 67
times in the 10 months between September 2000
and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.
Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another
9/11 Aug 14 2002
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual
air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets
scrambled, and why has a cover up story been
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through
incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is
the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into car crashes at race tracks.
Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media
that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary
School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where
he was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his
movements that morning. See how many times
he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
by Steve Grey.
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.
A strange press conference. By Jared israel
and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems
than it Solves -- by Jared Israel and Francisco
Gil-White [7 October 2002]
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's
Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.
Bush is lying about where he was, what he was
doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
Why did the President - after being told "America
is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren
reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known
that at least one more hijacked plane was on the
loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
at the top level.
Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there
no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?
If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
" innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
3:1 Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2 AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3 UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic
aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board
using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate?), why
did the FBI claim that they were traced through the
use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names?
3:5 If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched
before boarding, as claimed in this article
why is there no airport security footage of them?
How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,
guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while
being searched, but avoiding security cameras
and not being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when
they were searched, and if they were not using
aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers
are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:11 According to this article
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to
subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas
they would have been affected themselves -
unless they had masks. The story gets better all
the time. They somehow got on board with masks,
gas, guns, knives and electronic guidance systems,
in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the
airport security cameras, and were not on the
passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic
in rented cars outside the airport (last minute
brushing up on the way there, about how to fly
the things!) and then crashed the planes in
breath taking displays of skilled piloting.
Just to make sure we knew who they were,
their passports were conveniently found in
spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the
planes and occupants. So they got on board
with false IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the
planes and airport security systems failed due
to incompetence (not once but 19 times! ), where
is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into racehorse doping scandals.
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking of
AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American
Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined By David L. Graham
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York
the night before the attacks?
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects
official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas
von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse
spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody
had ever concieved of planes being used in this
manner, their statements in this article,
4:5 Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,
quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades.
And there are other examples of this possibility
having been widely recognized prior to sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any
threat had been overwhelmingly perceived as
being overseas. The statement she made is in
this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor
Dr. Condoleezza Rice -- The James S. Brady
Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S.
by Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington
Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
4:9 What did happen to Flight 93? by Richrad Wallace.
The Daily Mirror sept 13, 2002
Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type
allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible ?
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel
confident enough of it's case against Bin laden
to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably
because new video technology makes it impossible
to distinguish between a real video confession
and a fake.
5:1 When seeing and hearing isn't believing.
by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:2 Last word in High Tech trickery. by David
Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned
agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
by Steve Grey.
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden
has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
5:3 Bin laden denies terror attacks and points
finger at jews. Annanova news.
5:4 Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks
holy war. ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
5:5 Bin Laden denies being behind attacks.
JS ONline Milwaukee Jornal Sentinal Sept 16 2001
5:6 Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in
USA were committed by some American terrorist
group. Pravda Sept 12 2001
5:7 Bin laden Denies US attack says paper.
Middle East News
5:8 Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks
CNN sept 17 2001
5:9 Bin Laden denies role in attacks.
newsday.com Sept 17 2001
5:10 Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in
attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was
reported that investigators were already looking
into huge volumes of insider trading on airline
stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared?
Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that
more than a year later, they still do not know
who was responsible? Should not alarm bells
have been ringing BEFORE the attacks with
these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously
managed the firm which handled much of the trade,
are we seriously expected to believe that he
doesn't know who was responsible?
6:1 Suppresed Details of Criminal Insider
Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest
Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard
Managed Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL,
by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
6:2 Mystery of terror `insider dealers',
by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
6:3 Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11,
by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert,
6 Dec 2001
Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger
inquiries into local government contract scandals.
Section 7: The pentagon frame up
It is alleged that that American Airlines 77
(a hijacked Boeing 757) crashed into the Pentagon.
A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan
of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make
an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a
35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building
- and not leave any wreckage outside?
7:1 This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon
was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon
attack to have been a self - inflicted frame up.
7:2 For a quick overview of the impossibility of the
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
7:3 Physical and mathematical analysis of
Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002
Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate
eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts
examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002
7:5 The Pentaogn crash hoax
Sectrion 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a
retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been
planned months before ?
8:1 BBC News report by George Arney.
8:2 U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida.
White house given strategy two days before
Sept 11. NBC news. May 16 2002
8:3 US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September
11 By David Rennie in Washington
Why were we originally told that the attack on
Afghanistan was not planned prior to sept 11,
and was purely a retaliation to a "surprise"
attack, and the story then changed after proof
of the preplanned attack came to light ?
Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate
behind the scenes.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin
Laden so much that they wanted to get him first.
So why didn't they arrest him when they had
the chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment
at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by
Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of
Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
9:4 Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked
away by Michael C. Ruppert
And why was the Bush family still in business
with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?
Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business
Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate
Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control
--Colombian Opium Production Will Soar;
The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the
U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its
Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top
Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne, 5 Mar 2001
The George W. Bush Money Tree
9:9 Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's
oil companies funded by Bin Laden family and
wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden,
by Rick Wiles,Sep 2001
Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group,
Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman,
10 Jan 2002
9:11 Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden
Story by Jared Israel
9:12 BushLaden by Jared Israel
9:13 Addition to the above article
9:14 Judicial Watch:Bush/Bin Laden connection
"has now turned into a scandal" Statement from
Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two!
by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had
business ties with Osama's Brother in Law
by Michel Chossudovsky 27 december 2002
And why did the US turn down an offer to
extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming
him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
Section 10: The suspicious collapse
of the World trade centre Towers.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious
inquiry? Why was the debris rushed away for
recycling before any examination could be held?
10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics
by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics.
part 2 by J.McMichael
"Burning Questions...Need Answers":
Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for
Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse,
4 Jan 2002
10:6 A firefighter says "we think there
were bombs set in the building"
10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants
on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty
and Jared Israel
10:8 Documentary footage from the scene
of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness accounts
from firefighters at the scene reveal serious
flaws in the official accounts.
For a series of engineering articles and
informative videos on the WTC collapse, see
10:10 Evidence of explosives in South
WTC Tower collapse
10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition
10:12 Capter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)
10:13 Capter 2 (with comment)
Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosine)
burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected
to believe that burning kerosine towards the top
of the building (heat travels upwards) somehow
caused both towers to neatly implode in a
manner identical to that of a controlled demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into suburban housefires. Why is discussion
of the possibility of a controlled implosion
completely taboo? Why do authorities keep
inventing ridiculous stories about burning
jet fuel melting steel?
Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !
Why were the FBI told to not investigate
the Bin Laden family links in the US?
Has someone been sitting on the FBI?
Transcript of a BBC Newsnight Report on
"the questionable links of the bin Laden
Family," 6 Nov 2001
(added comments by Jared Israel)
Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin
Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
US efforts to make peace summed up by
`oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror
Links Say They Were Told, Let Sleeping Dogs Lie
By Brian Ross and Vic Walker.
ABC News Dec 19 2002
After capuring one of the six most wanted
Taliban leaders, the US then let him go.
"By mistake " of course, because of "flawed
11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake'
Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
11:8 US accidentally set wanted taliban
Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.
11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright say FBI
assigned to intelligence operations continue
to protect terrorists from criminal investigations
and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002.
Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a
CIA plan to commit terrorist acts against the
US and frame Cuba.
Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted
Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke
War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion
in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war.
Comments by Jared Israel.
Scanned images of the actual document.
12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
If such tactics were considered normal and
acceptable practice by the Government in
1962, what evidence is there that things have
Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy
as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW
STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE? Zbigniew
Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In
a 1997 Book - It Is "A Blueprint for World
Dictatorship," Says a Former German Defense
and NATO Official Who Warned of Global
Domination in 1984, in an Exclusive Interview
With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network?
A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror --
The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet ·
Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of
mainstream media articles. Compiled by
The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
"Articles documenting US creation of taliban
and Bin Laden's terrorist network" Series of
links to different articles
"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel
"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad
schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel
U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo,
by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda?
Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President
Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
[Posted 6 October 2001]
Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits:
Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington
Section 15: Why have the President and Vice
President resisted moves for an inquiry into Sept 11?
Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes
CNN Jan 29 2002.
Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry.
CNN May 17 2002
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept.
11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation
By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel.
CBS News. May 23 2002.
15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush.
White House retreats on independent probe.
Dana Priest and Dana Milbank.
Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01
ABOVE WEBPAGE AT :
PLEASE FORWARD -- PLEASE FORWARD