----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell <supremelawfirm@...
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 9:27 PM
Subject: IRS is now admitting that "The Federal Zone" is correct, on a dramatically significant point!
This only took them 20 YEARSto admit, however:
that book was first published in March 1992: how time flies!
Very VERY interesting: here, the IRS is almost admitting, officially,
that "The Federal Zone"is correct on this dramatically significant point!
subtle indicator of one's status is the perjury oath which is found on IRS
forms. Under Title 28 of the U.S. Code,
Section 1746, there are two different perjury oaths to which penalties
attach: one withinthe United States**, and one withoutthe United States** (see Appendix Rfor the precise wording of 28 U.S.C. 1746).
If an oath is executed withoutthe United States**, it reads as follows:
I declare ... under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing
is true and correct.
If an oath is executed within the United States**, it reads as follows:
I declare ...
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Thus, your signature under the latter oath can be
presumed to mean that you are already subject to the jurisdiction of the United States**. This latter oath is the one found on IRS Form 1040.
The following text is slightly in error (see section 1746(1) above,
for the correct text):
To Establish Proof of Identity and Right to AccessPresenting a sworn statement as to your identity, under penalty of
(You may include in your FOIA request
"I declare under penalty
of perjury of the laws of the United States of America [sic]
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on [date]. I am [your name] and I
See also the Answer to Question #16 in our 31Q&A:
"The Federal Zone" electronic 11th edition is here:
BTW: we are no longer selling hard copies without the author's autograph
and private embossing seal:
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Joseph wrote:
That text came off the IRS website so I suspect it is misleading.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]