dmgan you missed a step. First they denied there was any warming trend. Next, the admitted it is warming but that there was no evidence it was antropogenic,Message 1 of 3962 , Apr 1, 2000View Sourcedmgan you missed a step. First they denied there
was any warming trend. Next, the admitted it is
warming but that there was no evidence it was
antropogenic, Now they are onto what we might call plan C,that
is, stating that warming will be benificial. And I
guess when the warming becomes obviously disaterous
then plan D will be to say that there was no way of
knowing this would happen. Of course some are still on
plan A. But then again some people still think the
Earth is 6,000 years old and that we never actually
landed people on the moon. It ws done with trick
This group started in 1999 and got its first posting on volcanos in 2001. BUT you got nothing nada on the underwater volcano that erupted or formed off OregonMessage 3962 of 3962 , Mar 5, 2008View SourceThis group started in 1999 and got its first posting on volcanos in
2001. BUT you got nothing nada on the underwater volcano that
erupted or formed off Oregon Coast.
Let me check if you got anything on NOAA.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, shotsky1 wrote:
> This is an interesting article which describes
> the difficulty encountered in recreating a
> temperature profile over the last century. Of course the
> temperature profile is how we determine whether, and how
> much, the global climate is changing. Very interesting
br><br>Summary:<br>The records of annual global surface temperature
> anomalies and their regional distribution are not
> explicable by a theory of steady almost uniform global
> temperature increase, such as the supposed effects of
> increases in greenhouse gases. The surface temperature
> behaviour is much more readily explained by local effects,
> particularly heating, which can take place in both urban and
> rural sites, and is most likely in cold locations.
> <br><br>The MSU satellite temperature records of the lower
> troposphere detect important climate effects also evident in
> the surface record, such as those of volcanos, ocean
> circulation (El Niño, and ocean cooling) and the sun. They do
> not detect, however the regional hotspots which are
> largely responsible for the rise in surface temperature.
> The differences between the surface temperature
> record since 1978 and that recorded by the MSU
> satellites in the lower troposphere must therefore be
> largely due to local heating which is highly regional,
> and is particularly evident in cold climates.