------ Forwarded Message
From: Ian Henshall <info@...
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 13:05:56 +0100
Subject: Newsflash: Houla massacre victims "were supporters of Syrian
2 June 2012
BBC's Newsnight last night interviewed a London based Syrian
businessman who stated that the families murdered by terrorists in
Houla were supporters of the Syrian government, not the opposition.
If correct this would make it highly unlikely that the narrative
pushed by the mainstream media is true, and suggests the opposite is
the case: the atrocity was committed not by the Assad regime but by
the insurgents, supported by NATO, Al Qaeda and the gulf arab
dictators, and reported to be covertly armed by Turkey's Muslim
Brotherhood linked government.
The official story of the Houla massacre has changed substantially
since it first broke, with unconfirmed reports from insurgents
(routinely described on the BBC as activists). Version one,
corroborated by at least one BBC corespondent, had it that the
victims were killed by heavy weapons of the Syrian army. Version two
was that villagers had been randomly killed by militias sponsored by
the Assad government. Version three, the current version, concedes
that most of the victims came from a few extended families.
It should not be difficult to establish who the families were loyal
to: the insurgents or the Syrian government. The Syrian businessman
on Newsnight stated they were related to an MP elected in recent
elections which the insurgents have boycotted.
It was not clear whether the information from the Syrian businessman
was expected in this live TV show. The potential bombshell was
ignored by hawkish presenter Gavin Essler and high profile warmonger
Paul Wolfovitz, who demanded a military attack on Syria. A UN
spokesman refused Essler's invitation to confirm that the Houla
victims were killed by Syrian government forces.
If we now hear less and less about the massacre with no further
details, many will conclude that the prima facie suspects for the
atrocity are the insurgents, backed by NATO and the Gulf arab
dictators, aided and abetted by the mainstream media, including the
BBC. This would be a classic false flag terrorist atrocity.
Ironically the Egyptian branch of the Muslim Bortherhood has
denounced the 9/11 attacks as a false flag atrocity organised by
Israel or the CIA.
In one way this would be good news: there are no logistical reasons
why these people cannot be arrested, prosecuted and tried. It is
established in international law that propaganda on behalf of war
criminals is in itself a war crime. The fact that no-one would expect
this to happen is testimony to the tacit acceptance that NATO
governments and media have no real interest in human rights.
01273 326862 daytime
We will support any new investigation of the 9/11 attacks so long as
*it is run by uncompromised people with a range of opinion including
those inclined to disbelieve the official 9/11 story,
*it follows the evidence wherever it leads
if it takes place in the US to be credible it will need
*full legal authority to demand immediate access to any evidence and
any witness it chooses
*the resources it requires to carry out its investigation
Reinvestigate 911 is supported by Coffee Plant (www.coffee.uk.com)
suppliers of organic and Fairtrade coffees to caterers and retail
customers. Phone 0208 453 1144
------ End of Forwarded Message