islamic terrorists hide behind the symbol of islam like the national front hide behind the british flag, it gives them the protection they need to create chaosMessage 1 of 19 , Aug 17, 2002View Sourceislamic terrorists hide behind the symbol of islam like the national front
hide behind the british flag, it gives them the protection they need to
create chaos in the name of "morality".
living in a christian influenced country means i have no right to blame
islam for terrorism considering wat christianity has done, that goes for
america as well.
if you can be bothered to do your research and not listen to right-wing
tabloids or media then you would know that osama bin laden officialy hated
america because it betrayed him and the taliban, america set up the taliban
then screwed it over by abandoning them when the soviets attacked
afghanistan, thats why bin laden hates america the fact that he's a muslim
just makes it more complicated because he can base his hatred on fundamental
and unfortunately when it comes to the taliban u cant blame him because
america did betray the taliban, and all americans share the guilt of the
attacks through their obvious political apathy. american foreign policy has
so much bloodshed on it, ordinary american people should hav expected the
consequences sooner than later.
yet again im completely off the point sorry.
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Salutations, Allow me to place a drop of reason in a pool of so much confusion. TOLERATE: …the passengers on board the planes which were apparently hijackedMessage 1 of 19 , Aug 17, 2002View SourceSalutations,
Allow me to place a drop of reason in a pool of so much confusion.
the passengers on board the planes which were apparently hijacked
were no more innocent than me or you. If the plane that was hijacked
in Pennsylvania was a lone incident and it was a prison full of
convicted killers then would there be so much outrage at it? nobody
is innocent and it would show your dedication to your beliefs if you
acknowledged that so you had a terrorist attack big deal so has
To imply that the passengers on September 11th deserved to be
murdered, then immediately compare those passengers to convicted
criminals, and then trivialize the entire tragic event is both a
groundless and perverted insult to the lives and memories of those
murdered and their loved ones. If you, even through your
INTOLERANT, anti-American bias, cannot see this, it's not America's
problem, it's yours.
You are right when saying there is no physical evidence in
afterlife. Afterlife, God etc. is a kind of faith It is useless for
you to discuss about this because you don't have faith in God.
A casual stroll through a lunatic asylum shows that faith does not
prove anything. The reason why an afterlife and god require faith
is because there is no reason to believe in such absurd notions;
they are simply centuries-old, man-made myths. Further, since you
take this myth literally (i.e. believe in god), you cannot talk
about anything regarding intelligence.
Two things. You put faith in the media telling us that those were
Islamic fundamentalists blowing up planes and you put faith that the
plane was `loaded with innocent passengers' how come you know it was
Islamic fundamentalists and how come you know there were `innocent
passengers' (maybe there was a serial killer in it)..
The evidence is clear. They were Islamic. Their identities are
known. If they were not fundamentalists, they would not have done
it. These facts are not in dispute. The only points of dispute are
about those who inspired the hijackers, not who they were.
What evidence are you talking about Charlie? The evidence made public by the Americans, right? The names, the photos and every single detail.. right? And youMessage 1 of 19 , Aug 18, 2002View SourceWhat evidence are you talking about Charlie? The
evidence made public by the Americans, right? The
names, the photos and every single detail.. right? And
you put your faith in it. On what basis, just because
it makes "logic"?.. right?
Then on what basis do you reject Quran? When 1400
years back it said how an embryo is developed in a
womb, or how universe was created, or that every
living thing is made up of water... doesnt it all make
one absolute beginners logic, that by saying all
this.. 1400 years back (with no American technology
and all).. the writer must be beyond "Human
Intelligence".. and that He may only be "God?"
Now you dont put your faith in that. Americans hand
you out the photos and names of Arabs, calling them
terrorists and you put your faith in that. Then again,
what about Quran? Why not Quran? Why not faith in
Name one thing in Quran which is proven false (even by
America!) Not one thing contradicts.. While the Sept
11 theories take U-turns every single news bulletin.
Yet you put your faith in it, that the terrorists were
Arabs. What makes you so absolute sure?
This is not a political debate, tolerate. Its about
accepting theres a God. And believing in Faith.
Charlie seems to contradict himself in every email he
writes. He puts faith in National Sciences and in
American Theory of Sept 11, yet he does not put faith
in Quran (miracles of which are proven time &
again)... and compares faith which ostrich's head in
we believe in what we want to believe in. Not in
righteousness or falsehood. Not that which makes
sense, but can be turned around to make sense. That is
why charlie ends up believing in National Sciences and
not in Quran, yet agreeable by all.. Quran is absolute
Tolerate.. you an atheist? Do you believe in Quran?
When one put a faith in something, theres no room for
conditions. Charlie, puts his faith in Americans fact
that OBL is the mastermind behind Sept 11. Bravo, in
his last email mentioned that there is no plane debris
at pentagon even..(proven).. so lets just wait and let
the time do all the talking...
And before I end, dont forget.. 1400 years and yet
time has laid not one single black dot on Quran.
�'ve said it time and again.. but this time its for
tolerate... If you change one word from Quran, the
entire text will change... for it is bounded with a
mathematical lock. Again, 1400 years back...
Yet there are people, knowing this and shown on their
faces... refuse to accept Islam.
> Two things. You put faith in the media telling us
> that those were
> Islamic fundamentalists blowing up planes and you
> put faith that the
> plane was `loaded with innocent passengers'�how come
> you know it was
> Islamic fundamentalists and how come you know there
> were `innocent
> passengers'�(maybe there was a serial killer in
> The evidence is clear. They were Islamic. Their
> identities are
> known. If they were not fundamentalists, they would
> not have done
> it. These facts are not in dispute. The only
> points of dispute are
> about those who inspired the hijackers, not who they
Do You Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs